本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

template-updater

Research-backed template refresh workflow for updating existing templates with placeholder verification and rendering validation.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md3.2 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Template Updater

Overview

Use this skill to refresh an existing template safely: research current best practices, compare against current implementation, verify placeholder completeness, apply updates, and validate rendering.

When to Use

  • Template produces outdated or incorrect output when rendered
  • New framework conventions make template content stale
  • Reflection flags template quality issues
  • User asks to audit/refresh an existing template

The Iron Law

Never update a template blindly. Every refresh must be evidence-backed, TDD-gated, and integration-validated.

Workflow

Step 0: Evaluate Current State

  1. Read the template file and understand its purpose
  2. Identify all {{PLACEHOLDER}} tokens and their expected values
  3. Check which creators/skills use this template
  4. Identify issues: missing placeholders, outdated content, wrong structure

Step 1: Research Best Practices

  1. Read .claude/templates/CLAUDE.md for template conventions
  2. Review similar templates for patterns
  3. Check the template-renderer skill for rendering expectations
  4. Use Skill({ skill: 'research-synthesis' }) if external research needed

Step 2: Generate Patch Backlog

  1. List specific changes needed
  2. Prioritize: structural fixes > content updates > formatting improvements
  3. Ensure all placeholders are documented

Step 3: Apply Updates

  1. Write or update rendering tests first (RED phase)
  2. Apply template changes (GREEN phase)
  3. Refactor for clarity (REFACTOR phase)
  4. Use Edit tool — never rewrite the entire file

Step 4: Verify Integration

  1. Verify all {{PLACEHOLDER}} tokens are documented in the template header
  2. Test rendering with Skill({ skill: 'template-renderer' })
  3. Verify output matches expected structure for the artifact type
  4. Run pnpm lint:fix && pnpm format

Step 5: Record

  1. Log changes via MemoryRecord if significant
  2. Update CHANGELOG.md entry

Domain-Specific Validation

  • All {{PLACEHOLDER}} tokens MUST be documented with description and example
  • Template MUST render without errors when all placeholders are provided
  • Template output MUST match the target artifact's expected structure
  • Conditional sections MUST handle missing optional placeholders gracefully

Anti-Patterns

  • Adding placeholders without documenting them
  • Hardcoding values that should be placeholders
  • Breaking the template's rendering by changing placeholder names
  • Removing sections that creators depend on

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

Use when you want to improve response quality through meta-cognitive reasoning. Applies 15+ reasoning methods to reconsider and refine initial outputs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

N-round opposing-stance debates for trade-off analysis. Assigns pro/con roles to agents, runs structured debate rounds with quality scoring, and produces a moderator synthesis with confidence-rated recommendation. Generalizable to architecture, technology, security, and design decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

Force adversarial code review stance that eliminates confirmation bias — reviewer must find issues or re-analyze

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

Creates specialized AI agents on-demand when no existing agent matches a request. Use when the Router cannot find a suitable agent for a task. Enables self-evolution by generating persistent agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

LLM-as-judge evaluation framework with 5-dimension rubric (accuracy, groundedness, coherence, completeness, helpfulness) for scoring AI-generated content quality with weighted composite scores and evidence citations

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

oimiragieo のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する