本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

boundaries

Analyze Phoenix context boundaries and module coupling via mix xref. Use when checking cross-context calls, validating dependencies, before splitting modules, or reviewing architecture.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(3)

  • SKILL.md4.5 KB
  • references/context-design.md4.4 KB
  • references/refactoring-boundaries.md4.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Phoenix Context Boundary Validation

Analyze module dependencies to ensure clean context separation and proper architectural boundaries.

Usage

/phx:boundaries              # Check for violations
/phx:boundaries --assess     # Score context health (0-100)
/phx:boundaries --fix        # Suggest fixes for violations

--assess Mode: Context Health Score

Evaluate overall boundary health with a quantified score.

Metrics Calculated

MetricHealthy RangeRed FlagWeight
Modules per context3-15>20 or <220%
Public API surface5-30 funcs>40 funcs15%
Fan-out (contexts called)1-4>620%
Fan-in (called by contexts)1-6>1015%
Circular dependencies0>015%
Boundary violations0>015%

Commands for Assessment

Use Glob to count .ex files per context directory under lib/my_app/*/. Use Grep to count public function definitions per context file under lib/my_app/*.ex. Run mix xref graph --format stats for dependency analysis. Run mix xref graph --format cycles --label compile for compile-time circular dependencies.

Output Format

## Context Health Assessment

### Overall Score: 82/100 (Good)

| Context | Modules | API | Fan-Out | Fan-In | Score |
|---------|---------|-----|---------|--------|-------|
| Accounts | 5 | 12 | 2 | 4 | 95 |
| Orders | 18 | 45 | 8 | 3 | 62 |
| Shared | 2 | 8 | 0 | 12 | 78 |

### Issues Found

1. **Orders** - Too large (18 modules, 45 funcs)
   - Consider: Extract Fulfillment, Invoicing sub-contexts

2. **Orders** - High fan-out (8 contexts)
   - Consider: Review if all dependencies necessary

### Recommendations

- Split Orders into Orders + Fulfillment
- Review Accounts ← Billing dependency

Iron Laws - Never Violate These

  1. Controllers call only contexts - No direct Repo access from web layer
  2. Schemas are pure data - No side effects, no Repo calls in schema modules
  3. Contexts own their schemas - Don't import schemas from other contexts
  4. Explicit dependencies only - Cross-context calls must be intentional
  5. DO NOT refactor context boundaries without running mix xref first — Refactoring without dependency data creates new violations; always map the dependency graph before moving modules

Dependency Rules

LayerCan CallCannot Call
ControllersContexts, Plug, ConnRepo, Schemas directly
LiveViewsContexts, Components, PubSubRepo, Schemas directly
ContextsOwn schemas, Repo, other contextsWeb layer modules
SchemasEcto types, validationsContexts, Repo

Analysis Commands

Check Compile Dependencies

Run mix xref graph --label compile-connected.

Find What Depends on a Context

Run mix xref graph --sink MyApp.Accounts --label compile.

Find What a Module Calls

Run mix xref callers MyApp.Accounts.get_user!/1.

Check for Circular Dependencies

Run mix xref graph --format cycles --label compile.

Red Flags to Detect

IssueDetection CommandFix
Repo in web layergrep -r "Repo\." lib/my_app_web/Move to context
Schema with queriesgrep -r "import Ecto.Query" lib/my_app/**/schemas/Move queries to context
Cross-context schema importgrep -r "alias MyApp.Other.Schema" lib/my_app/ctx/Call context API
Business logic in LiveViewgrep -r "Repo\.|Ecto\.Multi" lib/my_app_web/live/Extract to context

Boundary Verification Process

  1. Run mix xref graph --label compile-connected for overview
  2. Check for context cross-contamination
  3. Verify no direct Repo calls from web layer
  4. Ensure schemas have no side effects
  5. Validate explicit cross-context dependencies

Next Steps

Always end with actionable follow-up — findings without a plan get lost:

- `/phx:plan` — Create a plan to fix violations (recommended for 3+ issues)
- `/phx:quick` — Fix a single boundary violation directly
- `/phx:review` — Review specific modules for deeper issues

References

For detailed patterns, see:

  • ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/context-design.md - Context design principles
  • ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/refactoring-boundaries.md - Fixing boundary violations

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Ash Framework — resources, actions, policies, aggregates; Use when generating resources via mix ash.codegen, editing…

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix5652026年10月6日 更新

Ash Framework — resources, actions, policies, aggregates, calculations, AshPhoenix.Form, LiveView, migrations. Use when generating resources via mix ash.codegen, editing changes, checks, types, validations, or domain code interfaces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix5652026年10月6日 更新

assigns

無料

Compatibility alias for the Elixir/Phoenix plugin's LiveView assigns audit. Invoke explicitly with /lv:assigns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix5652026年10月6日 更新

Inspect LiveView socket assigns for memory bloat — missing temporary_assigns, unused assigns, unbounded lists needing streams, memory estimates. Use when LiveView memory grows or you need to add temporary_assigns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix5652026年10月6日 更新

audit

無料

Project health audit and health check — architecture, performance, tests, dependencies, code quality. Use when assessing overall project health, before releases, or after refactors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix5652026年10月6日 更新

Brainstorm Elixir/Phoenix features — explore ideas, compare approaches, gather requirements. Use when vague idea, not sure how to approach, or want to discuss before plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix5652026年10月6日 更新

oliver-kriska のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する