OpenClaw Design Audit

Separate mechanical violations from judgment. Report suggestions as suggestions unless a documented rule makes them violations.

Workflow

1. Read rubric.md and run every applicable category.
2. Read the consumer's installed Carapace version and current commit SHA.
3. Read the version-matched token contract and consumer adapters from the installed product guidance skill: openclaw-carapace for new installs or the openclaw-design-system compatibility alias for an upgraded lock.
4. Read the brand or marketing references when those categories apply.
5. Run deterministic source checks before judgment-based review.
6. Inspect representative rendered routes at desktop and mobile sizes.
7. Check light and dark themes where supported.
8. Emit the JSON and Markdown defined in report-format.md.
9. When asked to fix findings, apply only narrow changes allowed by fix-policy.md.
10. For scheduled ClawHub delivery, follow github-pr-delivery.md.

Evidence

Each finding must include:

• file and line
• category and severity
• stable rule ID
• concise remediation
• Carapace reference
• whether the finding is mechanical or judgment-based

Curation

• Include every error.
• Rank warnings before informational findings, then by affected-file count.
• Surface at most five non-error findings in the concise report.
• Summarize remaining non-error findings by count.
• Treat zero errors, zero warnings, and five or fewer informational findings as no significant drift.
• Never invent source locations or visual evidence.