1Password CLIの導入と認証を確認し、保存したパスワードやAPIキーをコマンドや設定へ渡します。デスクトップ連携やサービスアカウントにも対応します。
- 1Password CLIを導入したいとき
- APIキーをコマンドに渡したいとき
- CIでサービスアカウント認証を使う
OpenClawのベータ版・安定版・長期保守版の準備、公開、復旧、検証を進めるスキル。承認済み修正の移植や検証記録、公開後の確認まで扱います。
原文Prepare, publish, recover, or verify OpenClaw beta, stable, and extended-stable releases, including approved backports.
インストール方法を見るOpenClawのベータ版、安定版、長期保守版のリリースを、準備から公開、復旧、検証まで進めます。承認済み修正を保守用ブランチへ移す作業にも対応します。検証対象のコード、成果物、公開範囲、承認内容を記録し、テスト失敗の分類や中断した公開の復旧、公開後の確認と作業の整理を扱います。
リリースを担当する保守担当者が、必要な検証と公開手順を追跡したいときに向いています。失敗した工程を復旧する場合や、長期保守版へ修正を取り込む場合にも使えます。完了した検証記録と次の作業を一つの引き継ぎ記録にまとめます。
最新の方針はdocs/reference/RELEASING.mdで確認します。工程に応じて関連スキルや認証環境が必要で、認証情報の操作には$one-passwordを使います。バージョン変更と取り消せない公開には明示的な承認が必要です。準備だけの依頼は公開を含まず、ベータ版の承認も安定版への昇格を含みません。必要な検証は省略できず、公開済みバージョンと最終タグは変更できません。告知投稿には別途明示的な許可が必要です。
この紹介文は、公開されている SKILL.md をもとに AI(Claude Haiku)が作成しました。正確な仕様は下の原文を確認してください。
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Use for a release operation, not ordinary development or advisory mutation.
Read docs/reference/RELEASING.md for current policy. Load $release-private
when available before resolving private credential locators or host topology;
credential operations use $one-password.
Read only the references needed for the selected phase:
.33+ Gateway publication: extended-stable publication. Use the shared publisher with extended-stable inputs; its non-Latest GitHub Release carries evidence without native-app or ClawHub publication.$release-openclaw-ci for workflow execution and immutable manifests.$release-openclaw-mac for macOS operations.$openclaw-changelog-update, including its separate approved post-release docs-mirror route. Initial release generation keeps its existing format; docs publication does not run automatically during release. Requested announcements: $release-openclaw-announcement for Discord, $release-tweets for X. Announcements never gate publication and require explicit posting authorization.$verify-release. GHSA operations: $openclaw-ghsa-maintainer only with explicit security-workflow authorization.Every selected validation lane must succeed: Windows and macOS Node and other
normal CI jobs, install smoke, survivor
lanes, update-first-hop-compat*, pack/npm qualification, package integrity,
and Linux/Windows/macOS Gateway checks, including Windows packaged
install/upgrade checks in Release Checks. A cancelled run still blocks. Preserve
first failures and classify each one as below before recovery. Stable
publication requires stable/full evidence, soak, and blocking performance.
Beta-profile evidence cannot authorize stable publication. No lane or soak
waiver can bypass these requirements. All nine Gateway install/upgrade
combinations across Linux, Windows, and macOS are required for all-group
qualification. Preserve identity, provenance, complete evidence, and existing
publication approvals.
Every failed test gets an explicit lead decision, real release blocker or
flake, recorded in the handoff with its evidence: the same SHA passing
elsewhere or on rerun, no relation to the release delta, a runner or infra
signature, a history of the same case flaking, or a pre-existing product bug
that is not a regression (for example the 2026.9.6 "Assign to…" bug). A real
blocker is a regression in shipped bytes or behavior, or an update/install/
publish defect; fix it on the release branch. Rerun a flake on
the same Release SHA with at most two recorded reruns by default, and file a
fix-in-parallel issue or PR on main with the evidence. Never re-cut, change
tooling, or start a new FRV for a flake. A flake that remains red blocks publication. Main-only failures and infrastructure
failures (runner outages, GitHub ghost jobs, hosted-runner offload) count as
flakes for the release.
Dependency advisories never delay a release. A newly published advisory is
never a reason to re-cut, change tooling, or rerun validation. Record it in the
release evidence and handoff, then file or queue the dependency bump on main
as a normal follow-up after publication. Only a known-malware finding stops
publication. Release dependency evidence and release-dispatched CI enforce this.
Main's CI health never gates a release. Validation and publication run from the
release branch plus pinned tooling, so a red main is not a reason to wait,
re-cut, or pause. When the release needs a release-tooling fix on main
(tooling SHAs must be trusted main commits), main failures the fix does not
cause must not hold that landing: prove on a clean main checkout that the
failure already exists there, record it in the PR body, and merge. During an
active release, an admin merge is allowed for a release-tooling PR in exactly
that situation. Red main still gets fixed, in parallel by a separate lane,
never on the release's critical path.
The operating objectives are approximately 20 minutes to seal validation and
publication within an hour, not measured guarantees. Source-only children start
alongside artifact producers; candidate consumers start as soon as the candidate
is ready. Independently sealed green children can be reused for the same exact
target and inputs even when their parent failed, was cancelled, or remains active;
verify their original admitted qualification identity (or historical trusted-main
workflow SHA) and current attempt. The sealed
manifest supplies the SDK evidence digest and npm publication decisions; it
never acknowledges SDK API changes, so supply
plugin_sdk_api_acknowledgement whenever the SDK report contains changes. The
publisher cannot accept waived validation evidence. Explicit
publisher inputs select publication scope; the candidate helper still validates its explicit
SDK acknowledgement when needed.
Explicit approval is required for version changes and irreversible publication. A request to cut, publish, or complete a named release carries through its validated publication and verification; do not ask again unless identity, channel, scope, or material risk changes. Ship authority for ordinary code is not release authority.
An operator's explicit approval to do whatever is needed to prepare a named release is standing authority for the necessary preparation decisions and repairs. Carry it through candidate and tooling fixes, upgrade/migration design, reviewed test or security-inventory alignments, isolated proof, commits, pushes, and validation recovery. Record the decision, its evidence, and the selected support contract; do not ask again merely because an already-approved class of work reaches an implementation or verification step. Continue independent work while resolving a blocker. This authority does not permit hiding defects, lowering a gate to manufacture success, destructive changes to operator state, unrelated work, or publication. A prepare-only request still requires a separate publication instruction before releasing artifacts or a bridge version.
Keep one compact state record using the handoff template: effective goal, version/tag/branch, cut/Code/Release SHAs, C/Q/P identities, active parent run and attempt, successful child artifacts, approved changes, phase and next action. Latest operator steering replaces superseded scope. Completed evidence stays complete until a named change invalidates it.
For regular releases, prepare complete notes before freezing Code SHA when
possible. If those notes are final, Code SHA and Release SHA are the same
commit: one successful fresh full qualification can supply both roles and
their exact publication bytes. Do not create another commit or run solely to
separate the labels. If notes change after qualification, a descendant whose
complete delta includes CHANGELOG/<version>.md (exact beta version or stable
base) and only that entry, its
matching record, and root index may use split-changelog-release-v1
to reuse product proof while qualifying new publication bytes. Any other
source delta, rename, or deletion returns to the Code SHA loop. Historical
root-only receipts retain changelog-only-release-v1.
New qualification freezes Q=C: the entire qualification workflow closure
belongs to the candidate. Keep independently trusted P (admission, verifier,
and publisher) separate. A Q harness repair requires a new C/Q and newly bound
evidence; P-only or infrastructure repairs can preserve the candidate. Missing
qualification contracts need a deliberate backport, never future-main fallback.
Once a candidate is cut, its base is the operator's decision. Never re-cut
(re-base the candidate on newer main) unless Peter explicitly asks for it in
that release. Without asking, cherry-pick already-merged main commits onto
the release branch only to fix a confirmed release blocker: a required lane
failing deterministically on the frozen candidate, or an update/install/
publish-bytes defect. Name each cherry-pick in the handoff record. Not allowed:
opportunistic backports, feature reverts, or a new base taken to "pick up" a
fix that cherry-picks cleanly enough with a small conflict resolution.
Release process improvements made during a release land on both branches.
Workflow, release-script, release-test, RELEASING.md, and release-skill changes
merge to main first, then get cherry-picked (-x) onto release/YYYY.M.PATCH
for the next candidate or patch. A qualification repair needed for this release
must land before freezing a new C/Q; never silently swap the harness for an
already qualified candidate. Where main-only CI infrastructure is missing on the branch,
keep the branch's expression form and port only the logic. Product code on the
release branch stays blocker-only per the rule above.
A release is not done while anything opened for it is still open. Before the
final report, list every PR created during the release (gh pr list --author @me --state open plus any PR bound to the session) and land or explicitly close
each one with a reason; confirm its fix is on main and, when it is release
tooling, on the release branch. Also remove the release's temporary worktrees,
abandoned local cut branches, and stale scripts/pr worktrees.
Published versions and final tags are immutable. Reuse successful exact-source artifacts; do not rebuild or republish as an implicit retry. The active release is the work queue: no opportunistic moving-main fixes or backports. Classify failures, repair their owner, retry the affected surface, then reassess rather than repeating the full release.
Required publication proofs and enforced environment approvals remain required. A passing sibling cannot replace missing required evidence. npm + ClawHub is the priority path. macOS, Windows, Linux, and Android native publication runs in parallel and never gates npm/ClawHub, GitHub release finalization, or main closeout. Selected Windows Node, Linux/Windows/macOS Gateway, and native-app CI failures block release validation. Platform publishers retain their own artifact and updater contracts; report pending platforms and proof gaps accurately.
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
1Password CLIの導入と認証を確認し、保存したパスワードやAPIキーをコマンドや設定へ渡します。デスクトップ連携やサービスアカウントにも対応します。
OpenClawへの自然な言葉の依頼をClaude Codeなどの外部コーディングエージェントへ振り分け、作業の開始や継続、スレッド内の会話をつなぐスキルです。
Add and live-prove a model provider with non-interactive config one-liners, without exposing credentials.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Requested GitHub PR/issue agent transcripts: redact, trim, preview, and insert safely.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
macOSのApple Notesをエージェントから作成・検索・編集・削除し、フォルダ間の移動やHTML・Markdownへの書き出しを行うスキル。
Apple Remindersの予定付きToDoをMacから確認・追加・編集するスキル。リストの管理や完了・削除にも対応し、iPhoneやiPadで見るタスクを整理できます。