本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

speckit-opsmill-auto

Run the full speckit workflow end-to-end — specify, plan, critique, tasks, implement, review — making all decisions autonomously. Stops before extract; run that manually.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md4.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

User Input

$ARGUMENTS

You MUST consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).

Outline

You are running the full speckit pipeline end-to-end. The user's input (above) is the feature description that will seed the specification phase.

This skill is a thin orchestrator over two sibling skills:

  • speckit-opsmill-prep — Specify → Plan → Critique → Tasks (+ spec/ask alignment check)
  • speckit-opsmill-implement — Implement → Review → Final report

Run them back-to-back, making all decisions autonomously. Do not stop to ask the user for input between phases — if a sub-phase requires choices (clarification questions in specify, research decisions in plan, drift remediation in alignment), use your best judgment and proceed. The user expects a hands-off, one-shot execution. Extraction (speckit-opsmill-extract) is not run by this command — the user invokes it manually after reviewing the implementation report.

Each phase below is executed by invoking the named skill (e.g. via the agent's Skill tool). Skills are agent-agnostic, so this workflow runs identically across any harness that supports skill discovery — not only those exposing speckit slash commands.

Phase A — Preparation (delegated to speckit-opsmill-prep)

Invoke the speckit-opsmill-prep skill with the user's feature description ($ARGUMENTS) verbatim.

  • This covers Specify → Plan → Critique → Tasks and the trailing spec/ask alignment check.
  • The sub-skill commits its own artifacts after each phase via speckit-checkpoint-commit.
  • If the alignment check inside prep loops (re-running plan/critique/tasks to fix spec drift), let it run to completion. Do not interfere.

Read prep's status line. speckit-opsmill-prep ends its output with a literal final line:

STATUS: <READY|BLOCKED> | SPEC_DIR: <absolute spec-dir path> | REASON: <...>

Parse that line — do not infer success from the prose summary:

  • Take SPEC_DIR from this line as the spec directory to pass to Phase B. This is the deterministic hand-off; do not scrape the path out of free text.
  • If STATUS: BLOCKED (e.g., alignment never converged within its retry budget, or a phase could not complete), surface the reason to the user and stop. Do not proceed to implementation on a misaligned or incomplete spec.
  • Only proceed to Phase B when STATUS: READY.

Phase B — Implementation tail (delegated to speckit-opsmill-implement)

Invoke the speckit-opsmill-implement skill with the SPEC_DIR path from Phase A as its argument. Because you pass an explicit spec-dir path, the sub-skill runs in autonomous-parent mode: its Phase 0 stop-conditions abort with a STATUS: BLOCKED line instead of pausing for a user.

  • This covers Phase 0 (Preflight) → Phase 5 (Implement loop in clean-context subagents) → Phase 6 (Review) → Phase 7 (Final report).
  • The sub-skill writes <spec-dir>/opsmill-implement-report.md and commits it.

Read implement's status line. speckit-opsmill-implement ends its output with a literal final line:

STATUS: <DONE|INCOMPLETE|BLOCKED> | SPEC_DIR: <...> | REASON: <...>

  • STATUS: BLOCKED — a Phase 0 stop-condition aborted before any implementation (no report written). Surface the reason in the final summary; do not retry from this orchestrator.
  • STATUS: INCOMPLETE — blocked tasks or missing local-pass evidence; capture that for the final summary. The user decides whether to re-run.
  • STATUS: DONE — all chunks completed with evidence.

In every case, do not retry from this orchestrator.

Completion

After both phases are complete, provide a brief summary:

  • Feature name and spec directory
  • Whether the alignment check inside auto-prep required retries (and how many)
  • Number of tasks completed (from the auto-implement report)
  • Any review findings that were fixed inline vs. deferred
  • Any notable decisions you or the sub-skills made autonomously

Do not open a PR, push, run extraction, or start a new feature. The user takes it from there — extraction (/speckit.opsmill.extract) is intentionally left as a manual follow-up so the user can review the implementation report first.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Analyzes recent CI failures on pull requests to identify flaky tests, using retry outcomes (failed attempt → green re-run) and cross-PR recurrence as evidence, and maintains a local longitudinal ledger so flakiness can be tracked over time. TRIGGER when: the user wants to find flaky tests, correlate recent CI failures, check which tests fail across PRs or recover on retry, or refresh the flakiness trend report. DO NOT TRIGGER when: babysitting a single PR's CI until green → monitoring-pull-requests; diagnosing or fixing one specific failing test → the bug-analysis skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

opsmill/infrahub5342026年10月11日 更新

Audits internal (dev/) and external (docs/) documentation completeness for a feature, subject, or set of existing docs, maps changes indicated by the user, across Infrahub's documentation layers, reports gaps, and optionally applies the fixes. TRIGGER when: the user wants to audit or check documentation coverage, find doc gaps after a feature branch, or verify docs are still current for a subject or specific files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: authoring new documentation from scratch → use the add-docs flow; only linting/formatting Markdown → run `uv run invoke docs.lint`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

opsmill/infrahub5342026年10月11日 更新

commit

無料

Stages and commits the current changes onto a safe working branch, enforcing branch discipline and optionally pushing upstream. TRIGGER when: the user wants to commit, save, or check in the current changes. DO NOT TRIGGER when: opening a pull request → pr.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

opsmill/infrahub5342026年10月11日 更新

Use when you've fixed a bug, added a feature, or made any user-facing change in a project that uses Towncrier and need to record it for the changelog — before committing or opening a PR, or whenever asked to add a changelog entry, towncrier fragment, or news fragment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

opsmill/infrahub5342026年10月11日 更新

Turns a single feature idea, improvement, or bug into ONE well-structured GitHub issue. TRIGGER when: the user wants to file/open/create an issue, turn a feature idea or improvement into a ticket, or capture something missing or broken as a ticket. DO NOT TRIGGER when: breaking work into multiple issues or planning a body of work → a planning skill; writing a full Product Requirements Document → creating-prd; the idea is still fuzzy and unhardened → grilling-ideas first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

opsmill/infrahub5342026年10月11日 更新

Synthesises the current conversation context into a Product Requirements Document and publishes it to GitHub (as a comment on a referenced issue, or a new issue). Synthesises from context; does not interview. TRIGGER when: the conversation has produced enough understanding of a feature and the user wants it captured as a PRD. DO NOT TRIGGER when: a single small issue is enough → creating-issues; the idea has not been stress-tested yet → grilling-ideas first; bug reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

opsmill/infrahub5342026年10月11日 更新

opsmill のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する