本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

speckit-plan

Execute the implementation planning workflow using the plan template to generate design artifacts.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md8.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

User Input

$ARGUMENTS

You MUST consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).

Pre-Execution Checks

Check for extension hooks (before planning):

  • Check if .specify/extensions.yml exists in the project root.
  • If it exists, read it and look for entries under the hooks.before_plan key
  • If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, skip hook checking silently and continue normally
  • Filter out hooks where enabled is explicitly false. Treat hooks without an enabled field as enabled by default.
  • For each remaining hook, do not attempt to interpret or evaluate hook condition expressions:
    • If the hook has no condition field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
    • If the hook defines a non-empty condition, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
  • When constructing slash commands from hook command names, replace dots (.) with hyphens (-). For example, speckit.git.commit → /speckit-git-commit.
  • For each executable hook, output the following based on its optional flag:
    • Optional hook (optional: true):
      ## Extension Hooks
      
      **Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension}
      Command: `/{command}`
      Description: {description}
      
      Prompt: {prompt}
      To execute: `/{command}`
      
    • Mandatory hook (optional: false):
      ## Extension Hooks
      
      **Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension}
      Executing: `/{command}`
      EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
      
      Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Outline.
      
      After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal {command} id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as /skill:speckit-... or $speckit-...). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
  • If no hooks are registered or .specify/extensions.yml does not exist, skip silently

Outline

  1. Setup: Run .specify/scripts/bash/setup-plan.sh --json from repo root and parse JSON for FEATURE_SPEC, IMPL_PLAN, SPECS_DIR, BRANCH. For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").

  2. Load context: Read FEATURE_SPEC and .specify/memory/constitution.md. Load IMPL_PLAN template (already copied).

  3. Execute plan workflow: Follow the structure in IMPL_PLAN template to:

    • Fill Technical Context (mark unknowns as "NEEDS CLARIFICATION")
    • Fill Constitution Check section from constitution
    • Evaluate gates (ERROR if violations unjustified)
    • Phase 0: Generate research.md (resolve all NEEDS CLARIFICATION)
    • Phase 1: Generate data-model.md, contracts/, quickstart.md
    • Phase 1: Update agent context by running the agent script
    • Re-evaluate Constitution Check post-design

Mandatory Post-Execution Hooks

You MUST complete this section before reporting completion to the user.

Check if .specify/extensions.yml exists in the project root.

  • If it does not exist, or no hooks are registered under hooks.after_plan, skip to the Completion Report.
  • If it exists, read it and look for entries under the hooks.after_plan key.
  • If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, skip hook checking silently and continue to the Completion Report.
  • Filter out hooks where enabled is explicitly false. Treat hooks without an enabled field as enabled by default.
  • For each remaining hook, do not attempt to interpret or evaluate hook condition expressions:
    • If the hook has no condition field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
    • If the hook defines a non-empty condition, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
  • When constructing slash commands from hook command names, replace dots (.) with hyphens (-). For example, speckit.git.commit → /speckit-git-commit.
  • For each executable hook, output the following based on its optional flag:
    • Mandatory hook (optional: false) — You MUST emit EXECUTE_COMMAND: for each mandatory hook:
      ## Extension Hooks
      
      **Automatic Hook**: {extension}
      Executing: `/{command}`
      EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
      
      After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal {command} id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as /skill:speckit-... or $speckit-...). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
    • Optional hook (optional: true):
      ## Extension Hooks
      
      **Optional Hook**: {extension}
      Command: `/{command}`
      Description: {description}
      
      Prompt: {prompt}
      To execute: `/{command}`
      

Completion Report

Command ends after Phase 2 planning. Report branch, IMPL_PLAN path, and generated artifacts.

Phases

Phase 0: Outline & Research

  1. Extract unknowns from Technical Context above:

    • For each NEEDS CLARIFICATION → research task
    • For each dependency → best practices task
    • For each integration → patterns task
  2. Generate and dispatch research agents:

    For each unknown in Technical Context:
      Task: "Research {unknown} for {feature context}"
    For each technology choice:
      Task: "Find best practices for {tech} in {domain}"
    
  3. Consolidate findings in research.md using format:

    • Decision: [what was chosen]
    • Rationale: [why chosen]
    • Alternatives considered: [what else evaluated]

Output: research.md with all NEEDS CLARIFICATION resolved

Phase 1: Design & Contracts

Prerequisites: research.md complete

  1. Extract entities from feature spec → data-model.md:

    • Entity name, fields, relationships
    • Validation rules from requirements
    • State transitions if applicable
  2. Define interface contracts (if project has external interfaces) → /contracts/:

    • Identify what interfaces the project exposes to users or other systems
    • Document the contract format appropriate for the project type
    • Examples: public APIs for libraries, command schemas for CLI tools, endpoints for web services, grammars for parsers, UI contracts for applications
    • Skip if project is purely internal (build scripts, one-off tools, etc.)
  3. Create quickstart validation guide → quickstart.md:

    • Document runnable validation scenarios that prove the feature works end-to-end
    • Include prerequisites, setup commands, test/run commands, and expected outcomes
    • Use links or references to contracts and data model details instead of duplicating them
    • Do not include full implementation code, model/service/controller bodies, migrations, or complete test suites
    • Keep this artifact as a validation/run guide; implementation details belong in tasks.md and the implementation phase
  4. Agent context update:

    • Update the plan reference between the <!-- SPECKIT START --> and <!-- SPECKIT END --> markers in CLAUDE.md to point to the plan file created in step 1 (the IMPL_PLAN path)

Output: data-model.md, /contracts/*, quickstart.md, updated agent context file

Key rules

  • Use absolute paths for filesystem operations; use project-relative paths for references in documentation and agent context files
  • ERROR on gate failures or unresolved clarifications
  • When research.md/plan.md names a specific code location, cite the module and symbol (e.g. some/module.py::SomeClass), never a line number — implementation shifts lines before the plan merges. See dev/guidelines/documentation.md

Done When

  • Plan workflow executed and design artifacts generated
  • Extension hooks dispatched or skipped according to the rules in Mandatory Post-Execution Hooks above
  • Completion reported to user with branch, plan path, and generated artifacts

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Analyzes recent CI failures on pull requests to identify flaky tests, using retry outcomes (failed attempt → green re-run) and cross-PR recurrence as evidence, and maintains a local longitudinal ledger so flakiness can be tracked over time. TRIGGER when: the user wants to find flaky tests, correlate recent CI failures, check which tests fail across PRs or recover on retry, or refresh the flakiness trend report. DO NOT TRIGGER when: babysitting a single PR's CI until green → monitoring-pull-requests; diagnosing or fixing one specific failing test → the bug-analysis skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

opsmill/infrahub5342026年10月11日 更新

Audits internal (dev/) and external (docs/) documentation completeness for a feature, subject, or set of existing docs, maps changes indicated by the user, across Infrahub's documentation layers, reports gaps, and optionally applies the fixes. TRIGGER when: the user wants to audit or check documentation coverage, find doc gaps after a feature branch, or verify docs are still current for a subject or specific files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: authoring new documentation from scratch → use the add-docs flow; only linting/formatting Markdown → run `uv run invoke docs.lint`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

opsmill/infrahub5342026年10月11日 更新

commit

無料

Stages and commits the current changes onto a safe working branch, enforcing branch discipline and optionally pushing upstream. TRIGGER when: the user wants to commit, save, or check in the current changes. DO NOT TRIGGER when: opening a pull request → pr.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

opsmill/infrahub5342026年10月11日 更新

Use when you've fixed a bug, added a feature, or made any user-facing change in a project that uses Towncrier and need to record it for the changelog — before committing or opening a PR, or whenever asked to add a changelog entry, towncrier fragment, or news fragment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

opsmill/infrahub5342026年10月11日 更新

Turns a single feature idea, improvement, or bug into ONE well-structured GitHub issue. TRIGGER when: the user wants to file/open/create an issue, turn a feature idea or improvement into a ticket, or capture something missing or broken as a ticket. DO NOT TRIGGER when: breaking work into multiple issues or planning a body of work → a planning skill; writing a full Product Requirements Document → creating-prd; the idea is still fuzzy and unhardened → grilling-ideas first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

opsmill/infrahub5342026年10月11日 更新

Synthesises the current conversation context into a Product Requirements Document and publishes it to GitHub (as a comment on a referenced issue, or a new issue). Synthesises from context; does not interview. TRIGGER when: the conversation has produced enough understanding of a feature and the user wants it captured as a PRD. DO NOT TRIGGER when: a single small issue is enough → creating-issues; the idea has not been stress-tested yet → grilling-ideas first; bug reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

opsmill/infrahub5342026年10月11日 更新

opsmill のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する