本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

keep-why-continuous-capture

Use when a non-trivial change lands or is abandoned and its decision, rejected alternatives, and reason must be captured. Not for trivial or corrective changes: those belong in CHANGELOG.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md6.5 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml202 B

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Keep why continuous capture

Contract

FieldBound contract
TriggerUser implements or reviews a non-trivial change involving a design decision, rejected alternative, workaround, incident fix, operational constraint, or changed assumption, including a change started and then abandoned after discovering why it must not be touched (no diff results). Proportionality gate: obvious/self-evident choices get a sentence, not an entry; corrections of stale values/bugs are CHANGELOG material, not decisions.
AuthorityReversible local: writes only one named topic file and one index line in the configured context directory; rollback is undo. No remote, VCS-history, credential, paid, published, or deployed mutation.
Side effectWrites or updates one topic file and one index line in the configured context directory and keeps the context index lean; records Decision + rejected alternative(s) + Reason, Type (decision
DoneEntry exists with all weight-bearing fields, zero invented rationale (gaps become focused questions or explicit unknown), conflicting sources recorded with conflict flagged open rather than resolved, confirmation gate honored, existing topic file updated instead of duplicated.

Inputs

  • Topic name (required): the decision or topic this entry belongs to. Supplied by the change context (e.g., the name of the file, feature, or concern being modified).
  • Decision text (required): what was decided or what constraint is in force.
  • Rejection(s) (required): what was rejected, abandoned, or considered and why. If nothing was rejected, state 'none' explicitly.
  • Reason (required): the cause or constraint that justifies this outcome. Must not be invented; if unknown, state 'unknown: <what would confirm it>'.
  • Type (required): one of decision, workaround, incident, constraint. If ambiguous, list all that apply.
  • Status (required): one of active, superseded, open, needs-review.
  • Evidence (required): confirmed, inferred, or unknown.
  • Source/Verification (optional): URL, commit, issue, PR, or post-mortem link. Per source-reference setting (always | never | filtered:<criteria>). 'no reference exists' is a complete answer.
  • Context directory (required at invocation time): the configured local directory where topic files live.
  • Confirmation gate: present the completed entry to the user before writing; proceed only on explicit confirmation.

Procedure

  1. Detect trigger. Recognize a non-trivial change involving a design decision, rejected alternative, workaround, incident fix, operational constraint, or changed assumption. This includes any change that was started and then abandoned after discovering why it must not be touched (zero diff). Apply the proportionality gate: obvious or self-evident choices require a sentence, not a full entry; corrections of stale values or bugs belong in CHANGELOG, not here. Done when: the trigger is confirmed or the skill exits silently for a trivial/corrective change.

  2. Bound scope. Identify the single decision or topic at the center of the change. Do not widen scope to related decisions, history, or speculative futures. Stop if the change is trivial, purely corrective, or does not involve a decision worth recording. Done when: one decision or topic is identified and scope is bounded.

  3. Collect entry fields. Gather the required fields: decision text, rejected alternatives and why each was rejected, reason for the outcome, type, status, evidence quality, and source/verification if available. If the reason is unknown, state 'unknown, <what would confirm it>'. Never invent rationale or resolve conflicts unilaterally. Done when: all required fields are gathered or marked unknown.

  4. Record conflicts open. If two or more sources give conflicting reasons, record each reason and its source, flag the conflict as open, and set the status to needs-review. Do not resolve the conflict. Done when: every conflict is recorded with both sides and flagged open.

  5. Confirm with user. Present the completed entry to the user for confirmation before writing. If the user declines or revises, incorporate feedback and reconfirm. Done when: the user explicitly confirms the entry.

  6. Write or update the topic file. Locate or create the topic file in the context directory. If the topic already has an entry with the same decision, update the existing entry instead of creating a duplicate. Write the entry with all collected fields. Keep the context index lean: do not add a new index entry if one already exists for this topic. Done when: the topic file is written or updated with the entry and the index is lean.

  7. Stop on confirmation gate refusal. If the user does not confirm, stop without writing. Return the collected (but uncommitted) fields as the result. Done when: the skill stops and returns the uncommitted fields.

Failure and recovery

  • No context directory configured: stop and report that the context directory is required. Do not choose a default location.
  • Topic file write fails (permission, disk full): stop, report the exact failure, and do not attempt rollback; the file is unchanged.
  • User declines confirmation: stop without writing. The entry is not persisted. Return the uncommitted fields.
  • Invented rationale detected: stop before writing. Flag the field as unknown and reconfirm rather than fabricating evidence.
  • No non-trivial decision found: exit silently without writing; do not manufacture an entry for a trivial or purely corrective change.
  • Conflicting sources: record each source as conflicting, set status to needs-review, do not resolve unilaterally.

Output

A new or updated entry in the topic file (Decision, Rejected alternative(s) with reason, Reason, Type, Status, Evidence, Source/Verification, and conflict flags where applicable), or the uncommitted fields if confirmation was refused or the trigger did not fire.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Use when explaining System V AMD64, ARM AAPCS, RISC-V psABI, stack frames, variadic calls, or FFI register rules. Not for the Rust FFI binding layer: use rust-ffi.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OutlineDriven/odin-claude-plugin372026年9月29日 更新

Use when configuring ADC sampling time, DMA-driven ADC, calibration, or DAC channel setup on bare-metal MCUs. Not for the DMA stream itself: use dma-baremetal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OutlineDriven/odin-claude-plugin372026年9月29日 更新

af-xdp

無料

Use when creating AF_XDP sockets, configuring UMEM and XSK rings, writing an XDP redirect program, or choosing copy versus zero-copy mode. Not for full kernel bypass: use dpdk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OutlineDriven/odin-claude-plugin372026年9月29日 更新

Use when a completed session needs an agent-environment retrospective. Not for an engineering retrospective from telemetry: use engineering-retrospective.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OutlineDriven/odin-claude-plugin372026年9月29日 更新

Use when a redacted, trimmed agent transcript must be appended to a GitHub PR or issue body, with human approval and preview. Not for automated or model-initiated insertion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OutlineDriven/odin-claude-plugin372026年9月29日 更新

agents-md

無料

Use when a repo needs agent setup, AGENTS.md added or made lean, CLAUDE.md audited, or agent instructions scored or pruned. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OutlineDriven/odin-claude-plugin372026年9月29日 更新

OutlineDriven のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する