本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

capture-environment

Snapshot the computational environment for a replication package — detects the analysis stack (R / Stata / Python) and emits the right lockfiles (renv.lock + sessionInfo.txt, requirements.txt / environment.yml / uv.lock, Stata version + ado package list), records seeds and RNG kind, optionally writes a pinning Dockerfile, and produces a paste-ready "Computational requirements" block. Use when user says "capture the environment", "snapshot my dependencies", "pin the versions", "make a renv.lock / requirements.txt", "make this byte-reproducible", or before releasing a replication package to openICPSR / the AEA Data Editor.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md11.0 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

/capture-environment — snapshot the computational environment

A replication package that runs on the author's laptop in 2026 and nowhere else in 2029 is not reproducible. This skill captures the exact computational environment — language versions, package versions, seeds, RNG kind, and (optionally) the OS layer — so a referee, the AEA Data Editor, or future-you can reconstruct it. It detects which stack the project uses and emits the artifacts that stack's ecosystem expects, then verifies the lockfile installs clean.

Core principle: Pin everything a result depends on. Display rounding aside, a re-run on a pinned environment should reproduce the paper to the replication-protocol.md tolerances — byte-identical when the optional Dockerfile is used.

When to use

  • Before releasing a replication package to openICPSR, Zenodo, Dataverse, or a journal archive — the AEA Data Editor / DCAS standard expects a documented, version-pinned environment.
  • Before submission, alongside /audit-reproducibility — that skill checks the numbers; this one captures the environment those numbers were produced in (its sessionInfo.txt requirement is satisfied by this skill).
  • After adding or upgrading a package mid-project — re-snapshot so the lockfile doesn't drift from what the code actually loads.
  • When handing a project to a co-author or RA who needs to reconstruct your stack.

Inputs

  • $0 — project directory. Defaults to the repo root. The skill looks under scripts/R/, scripts/stata/, scripts/python/.
  • --docker — also emit a Dockerfile pinning OS + language version + system libraries for byte-identical reproduction.
  • --no-verify — skip Phase 3 (the best-effort clean-install check). Useful in CI or when the toolchain isn't installed locally.

Workflow

Phase 0: Detect the stack

Glob for stack signals and decide which capture paths to run (a project may be multi-language — DiD in R, an IV robustness check in Stata):

SignalStackCapture path
scripts/R/*.R, DESCRIPTION, renv/, *.RprojRrenv + sessionInfo
scripts/python/*.py, *.ipynb, pyproject.toml, requirements.txt, environment.yml, uv.lockPythonpip / conda / uv
scripts/stata/*.doStataversion + ado list

If no signal is found, report and stop — there is no environment to capture.

Phase 1: Capture per language

R — emit two artifacts:

  • renv.lock via renv::snapshot() (run renv::init(bare = TRUE) first if the project isn't renv-managed; snapshot records every package + version + source/remote and the R version). Honors the seed conventions in r-code-conventions.md.
  • sessionInfo.txt via Rscript -e "writeLines(capture.output(sessionInfo()), 'output/sessionInfo.txt')" — the human-readable companion /audit-reproducibility looks for.

Python — emit whichever matches the project's existing tooling (do not invent a new one):

  • uv.lock (preferred when pyproject.toml + uv present — fully-resolved, hashed, cross-platform): uv lock / uv export --format requirements-txt > requirements.txt.
  • requirements.txt via pip freeze (or python -m pip freeze) for a venv/pip project — pin == exactly.
  • environment.yml via conda env export --no-builds for a conda project. Always also record the interpreter version (python --version) in the report.

Stata — Stata has no lockfile, so capture the closest equivalents (mirrors stata-code-conventions.md §3):

  • The pinned version line each .do file declares (e.g. version 18) — grep scripts/stata/*.do and report the version actually pinned.
  • An ado/plus package inventory: a small .do that runs which on the user-installed commands the pipeline uses (reghdfe, ivreg2, estout/esttab, rdrobust, csdid, …) plus ado dir and about, logged to output/sessionInfo_stata.txt.
  • A note that Stata version pinning is semantic (version 18 fixes command behavior), not a binary pin — the Dockerfile (Phase 2) cannot help here because Stata is licensed and not redistributable; record the exact Stata version + flavor (SE/MP/IC) + update level in the report so a replicator can match it.

Phase 1b: Record seeds and RNG

Grep the analysis scripts for the master seed and RNG kind so the "Computational requirements" block can state them:

  • R: set.seed(YYYYMMDD), and RNGkind() — flag "L'Ecuyer-CMRG" if parallel/Monte Carlo work is present (see simulation-conventions.md).
  • Stata: set seed and set sortseed.
  • Python: numpy.random.default_rng(seed) / random.seed() / framework seeds.

If the pipeline does randomized work (bootstrap, MC, RCT re-randomization, permutation inference) and no seed is found, surface it as a WARNING — an unseeded random result is not reproducible.

Phase 2: Dockerfile (only with --docker)

Emit a Dockerfile that pins the OS + language version + system libraries for byte-identical reproduction:

  • R → FROM rocker/r-ver:<X.Y.Z> (Rocker pins the R version), COPY renv.lock, RUN R -e "renv::restore()", plus apt-get install for system libs the packages need (e.g. libcurl4-openssl-dev, libgdal-dev for spatial work).
  • Python → FROM python:<X.Y.Z>-slim, COPY requirements.txt / uv.lock, RUN pip install -r requirements.txt (or uv sync --frozen).
  • Stata → cannot pin the licensed binary; emit a Dockerfile stub that documents the expected Stata version + flavor and leaves the stata install/license step to the replicator (with a comment pointing at the AEA's guidance on Stata images).

Pin a digest where possible (FROM image@sha256:…) so the base image can't drift.

Phase 3: Verify the lockfile installs clean (best-effort; skip with --no-verify)

Attempt a clean restore in a throwaway location and report PASS / FAIL — never overwrite the working environment:

  • R: renv::restore() into a temp library, or Rscript -e "renv::status()" for a dry check.
  • Python: uv sync --frozen / pip install --dry-run -r requirements.txt into a fresh venv.
  • Docker (if --docker): docker build the image.

A FAIL here means the lockfile references a package version that can't be resolved (yanked release, private remote, platform-specific wheel). Report it; do not auto-edit the lockfile.

Phase 4: Report

Print a paste-ready block and write it to output/computational_requirements.md:

## Computational requirements

**Software:** R 4.4.1 (or: Stata 18.0 SE, update 2026-01-15; Python 3.12.3)
**OS used:** macOS 15.5 (arm64) — Dockerfile pins Ubuntu 24.04 for portability
**Key packages:** fixest 0.12.1, did 2.1.2 (full list in renv.lock)
**Random seeds:** set.seed(20260609); RNGkind("L'Ecuyer-CMRG") for the bootstrap
**Approx. runtime:** [author confirms — e.g. ~12 min, 8 cores]
**Lockfiles in package:** renv.lock, output/sessionInfo.txt[, Dockerfile]

Pre-fill software/package/seed lines from the captured artifacts; leave runtime for the author to confirm.

Output / artifacts

StackFiles written
Rrenv.lock, output/sessionInfo.txt
Pythonrequirements.txt or environment.yml or uv.lock (matching project tooling)
Stataoutput/sessionInfo_stata.txt (version + ado list; named so it does not overwrite R's in a mixed project)
Any (--docker)Dockerfile
Alwaysoutput/computational_requirements.md (the paste-ready block)

Exit behavior

  • All captures succeeded, verify PASS (or --no-verify): exit 0, requirements block printed.
  • A missing-seed WARNING on a randomized pipeline: exit 0 with the warning surfaced — reproducibility is compromised but the snapshot still wrote.
  • Verify FAIL (lockfile won't resolve): exit 1, so the skill can gate a pre-release /commit. Report the unresolvable package; do not silently "fix" the lockfile.
  • No stack detected in Phase 0: exit 1 with the directories searched.

Cross-references

What this skill does NOT do

  • Re-run your analysis or check your numbers. It captures the environment; /audit-reproducibility verifies the manuscript's numeric claims against the outputs.
  • Package or de-identify data. Lockfiles describe software, not data. Disclosure avoidance, de-identification, and data-availability statements are out of scope — see confidential-data.md.
  • Upgrade or "fix" your dependencies. It records what the code currently uses. If a verify FAIL surfaces a yanked version, you decide whether to pin an alternative.
  • Pin a Stata binary. Stata is licensed and not redistributable; the skill records the exact version/flavor/update so a replicator can match it, but cannot containerize it.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Turn an incoming set of findings — from an AI reviewer, a referee report, a code review, a linter, or a second model — into verified fixes, without letting a confident misread damage correct work. Every finding is a CANDIDATE until checked against the actual source. Use whenever you receive review comments, audit findings, or a critique you did not write yourself, especially when the reviewer is a model or when the volume is too large to check by feel.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow1,6592026年9月28日 更新

Enforce the replication-protocol.md rule by cross-checking numeric claims in a manuscript against the actual R / Stata / Python outputs. Report PASS/FAIL per claim against tolerance thresholds. Use before submission and before releasing a replication package.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow1,6592026年9月28日 更新

Before and after changing anything shared — a function's return value, a signature, a schema, a label set, a config default, a constant, a file format — find every consumer and actually run them. Catches the change that looks purely additive but silently breaks a contract in a file you never opened. Use when editing shared code, adding a field/column/return element, renaming, changing units or defaults, or touching a pipeline that produces reported numbers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow1,6592026年9月28日 更新

challenge

無料

Stress-test a finding against the choices you did not make. Enumerates the discrete forks a competent analyst could have taken (measure definition, sample filter, control set, clustering level, weighting, functional form), runs the specification grid, and reports the distribution rather than a point estimate — then attacks the identifying assumption with named, computable sensitivity statistics. Use when the user says "is this robust", "challenge this result", "specification curve", "multiverse", "how sensitive is this", "what if I'd used a different measure", "stress-test my estimate", or before a result becomes a headline claim. NOT a reviewer of prose or code — it challenges the CLAIM.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow1,6592026年9月28日 更新

Save a structured state snapshot before stopping or handing off. Captures the active plan, recent decisions, file pointers (with line numbers), open questions, and the next 1–3 actions into a checkpoint file under `quality_reports/checkpoints/`. Optionally proposes `[LEARN]` entries to add to MEMORY.md. Use when user says "checkpoint", "save state", "snapshot before I stop", "where am I", "wrap up the session for handoff", or before a long break / model switch / collaborator handoff. Companion to (NOT replacement for) the narrative session-log workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow1,6592026年9月28日 更新

Generate a co-author / collaborator handoff brief for a multi-author, multi-machine project — summarizing what changed since the last brief (git delta), the current state of each artifact (manuscript, analysis, slides), open questions, how to reproduce locally, and any restricted-data access steps. Use when user says "coauthor brief", "handoff brief", "bring my coauthor up to speed", "what changed since last week", "onboard a collaborator", "write a handoff for [name]", or before sending a co-author the repo. NOT a commit or a checkpoint — it is the cross-machine, cross-person summary `meta-governance.md` only partially covers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow1,6592026年9月28日 更新

pedrohcgs のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する