本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

email-testing

End-to-end testing of email-dependent flows — signup confirmation, password reset, magic-link login, OTP/MFA codes, and notification emails. Covers the capture-inbox decision tree (Mailpit, Mailosaur, MailSlurp, Ethereal), Playwright polling without fixed sleeps, regex extraction of links/OTPs from the email body, deterministic per-test addresses (plus-addressing, per-inbox), subject/from/header/link assertions, and SPF/DKIM/DMARC deliverability checks as a separate suite. Use when: "test the signup confirmation email," "password reset email test," "magic-link login test," "capture OTP from email," "Mailpit," "Mailosaur," "MailSlurp," "email arrives flaky in CI," "assert email subject/from/links." Not for: Sending transactional email from your app code, or API-only contract tests of an email provider — those are api-testing / app concerns. Email HTML rendering across clients (Outlook/Gmail dark mode) is out of scope (note it as a gap; use visual-testing or Litmus). Related: playwright-automation, api-testing, test-data-management, qa-project-context.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(4)

  • SKILL.md17.8 KB
  • references/deliverability.md3.4 KB
  • references/hosted-inboxes.md5.4 KB
  • references/mailpit-playwright.md6.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

<objective> Email-dependent flows fail silently: a test that "signs up and clicks confirm" by calling the confirm endpoint directly never proves the email was generated, addressed, templated, and linkable. This skill captures the real email, waits for it without a fixed sleep, extracts the OTP or link from the body with an anchored regex, and completes the flow — so a broken template, an unsigned token, or a wrong-recipient bug actually fails the test. It also keeps deliverability (SPF/DKIM/DMARC) in a separate non-blocking suite so a DNS problem never reds your functional gate. </objective>

Quick Route

SituationGo to
Pick a capture tool"Capture-inbox decision tree" below
Poll an inbox without a sleepreferences/mailpit-playwright.md (polling helper)
Pull an OTP / link out of the bodyreferences/mailpit-playwright.md (extraction)
Full password-reset / signup / magic-link E2Ereferences/mailpit-playwright.md
Real addresses on stagingreferences/hosted-inboxes.md (Mailosaur)
Per-test throwaway inboxreferences/hosted-inboxes.md (MailSlurp)
Just preview a template locallyreferences/hosted-inboxes.md (Ethereal)
Flag SPF/DKIM/DMARC problemsreferences/deliverability.md
Tests pass locally, "no email yet" in CI"Flaky email in CI" below

Discovery Questions

Check .agents/qa-project-context.md first — if it exists, use it and skip anything answered there.

  • Where does the email need to be received? Local capture (Mailpit) covers most functional flows for free. A real, externally-deliverable address (staging, a third- party ESP, real DNS) means a hosted inbox (Mailosaur / MailSlurp). This is the single biggest tool-selection driver.
  • How parallel is the suite? High parallelism makes "the latest email" ambiguous — you need per-test unique addresses or per-test inboxes, not a shared mailbox.
  • Which flows? Signup confirmation, password reset, magic-link login, OTP/MFA, notification emails — they share one shape (capture, extract, complete) but differ in what you extract (link vs 6-digit code).
  • Is deliverability in scope? "Lands in inbox / passes SPF, DKIM, DMARC" is a separate non-blocking suite, not part of the functional OTP test. Decide upfront.
  • Local-only preview, or CI assertions? Previewing a template during dev is Ethereal; asserting in CI is Mailpit/Mailosaur/MailSlurp. Don't confuse the two.

Core Principles

  1. Capture the real email; never shortcut past it. Calling the reset endpoint directly or hardcoding a token skips the exact integration the test exists to cover — templating, recipient resolution, link generation, token signing. Submit on the UI, read the inbox.

  2. Poll, never sleep. Email arrival is asynchronous. A fixed waitForTimeout is either too short (flake) or too slow (wasted minutes) and is the #1 cause of flaky email tests. Use expect.poll / .toPass against /api/v1/messages, or a built-in waiter (messages.get, waitForLatestEmail) that already polls for you.

  3. One unique recipient per test. Two parallel tests both reading "the latest signup email" grab each other's mail. Make every test's address unique (plus-addressing or a per-test inbox) and filter by recipient when reading. Clearing the inbox between tests does NOT survive parallelism.

  4. Extract from the body with an anchored regex, guarded. Pull the OTP / link from the email body (message.Text / message.HTML), not the live page. Use \d{6} / .match( and assert the match is not null — a missing code must fail loudly, not become undefined.

  5. Assert content, not existence. "An email arrived" is a weak assertion. Check the subject, the from address, and that links point to the right domain. Wrong-template and wrong-link bugs only surface if you assert on content.

  6. Deliverability is a separate, non-blocking suite. SPF/DKIM/DMARC come from a real receiving server's authentication, never from the body text — and they must not block the functional flow tests.


Capture-inbox decision tree

Pick the cheapest tool that can actually receive your mail. Default to Mailpit for local + CI functional tests; reach for a hosted inbox only when you need real addresses or high-parallelism isolation.

ToolHosting / costAddress typeUse when
MailpitSelf-host, single binary or docker, free / open sourceAny local SMTP recipientDefault. Local + GitHub Actions functional tests, tight budget. REST API at :8025 (/api/v1/messages).
MailosaurHosted (API key), paidReal *.mailosaur.net addressesStaging/prod-like flows needing a real deliverable address; auto-waiting messages.get(serverId, { sentTo }); structured links/codes; real SPF/DKIM/DMARC.
MailSlurpHosted (API key), paidReal, per-inboxPer-test throwaway inboxes via createInbox() + waitForLatestEmail; strong parallel isolation.
EtherealHosted throwaway, freeCaptures, delivers nothingLocal-dev template preview only (createTestAccount + getTestMessageUrl). NOT for CI assertions.

For the budget signup-flow case (local + GitHub Actions, self-host fine): use Mailpit — a single binary / docker image with a free, open-source REST API at :8025. If you later need a real deliverable address, graduate that suite to Mailosaur or MailSlurp (hosted inboxes with real addresses). Do not "just check the database instead of the email" — that proves the row was written, not that the email was sent, addressed, and linkable.

Avoid: MailHog — archived/unmaintained since 2020; Mailpit is its drop-in replacement (same ports, compatible API), verified mid-2026. Also skip smtp4dev / Papercut for new suites — Mailpit's API and full-text search are better for automated assertions.

See references/mailpit-playwright.md for the docker-compose, the polling helper, and the extraction utilities; references/hosted-inboxes.md for Mailosaur / MailSlurp / Ethereal.


Polling an inbox (Mailpit)

Read the list endpoint with Playwright's request fixture, find the message addressed to this test's recipient, then fetch the full body by ID. Use expect.poll with a timeout and intervals — it retries until a match appears, so fast inboxes resolve instantly and slow ones still pass.

// `request` is the Playwright APIRequestContext fixture; plain fetch() works too.
await expect.poll(async () => {
  const res = await request.get(`http://localhost:8025/api/v1/messages?query=to:${encodeURIComponent(to)}`);
  const { messages } = await res.json();
  return messages.find((m) => m.To.some((t) => t.Address === to))?.ID ?? null;
}, { timeout: 30_000, intervals: [500, 1_000, 2_000] }).not.toBeNull();
// then: request.get(`http://localhost:8025/api/v1/message/${id}`) → { Text, HTML, Subject, From, To }

The query=to: filter plus the .find on the recipient is what makes parallel tests deterministic. Never take messages[0] / messages.at(-1) (newest overall) with no recipient filter. Full helper in references/mailpit-playwright.md.


Extracting OTPs and links

Match against the email body, anchored, with a null guard:

const otp = body.match(/\b(\d{6})\b/)?.[1];
expect(otp, 'no OTP in email body').toBeTruthy();   // throw / fail if null

const link = body.match(/https?:\/\/\S*(?:verify|confirm|reset|token=)\S*/i)?.[0];
if (!link) throw new Error('no verification link in email body');

Do NOT slice by index (body.split(' ')[3], substring(0, 6), indexOf('code')) — those break the moment the template changes a word. Do NOT read innerText of the live page when you mean the email body. If a 6-digit code could collide with other numbers, anchor on the label: body.match(/code[:\s]+(\d{6})/i). Hosted services expose structured message.html.links / message.html.codes — prefer those when available. See references/mailpit-playwright.md.


Deterministic addresses (parallel isolation)

The parallel-flake bug: two tests sign up at once and both poll for "the latest signup email," so they swap messages. Fixes, in order of preference:

  • Per-test unique address — plus-addressing / sub-addressing: user+${randomUUID()}@example.com, or signup.${Date.now()}@.... Most providers route user+anything@ to user@, so one real mailbox yields infinite unique recipients.
  • Filter every read by recipient — sentTo (Mailosaur) or a query=to: + .find match (Mailpit). Never take the newest message overall.
  • Per-test dedicated inbox — MailSlurp createInbox() gives each test its own inbox; Mailosaur gives each test a unique address on your server domain.

Clearing the inbox between tests is not sufficient under parallelism — two tests running at the same instant still collide. Unique address + recipient filter is the real fix. See references/hosted-inboxes.md.


Asserting subject / from / headers / links

After capture, assert on content:

  • expect(message.subject).toBe('Welcome to Example') — catches wrong-template bugs.
  • expect(message.from?.[0].email).toBe('hello@example.com') — catches misconfigured sender / reply-to.
  • Headers (List-Unsubscribe, custom X- headers) when your product sets them.
  • Links point to the right domain: expect(links.every((l) => new URL(l.href).hostname.endsWith('staging.example.com'))).toBe(true).

Mailosaur example asserting subject, from, and link domain is in references/hosted-inboxes.md.


Deliverability: SPF / DKIM / DMARC

Keep this in its own non-blocking suite, separate from functional flow tests. SPF, DKIM, and DMARC pass/fail + alignment come from a real receiving server authenticating your sending domain — they are not strings in the body, so never body.includes('spf') or body.match(/dkim/). And Mailpit does not validate SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment — it only does basic SpamAssassin content scoring, because nothing was sent over real DNS. Real alignment needs a hosted send-and-receive (Mailosaur deliverability report, or mail-tester.com for a one-off). Tag the suite @deliverability, run it as a non-required CI job (continue-on-error), and never assert deliverability inside the OTP / reset flow test. See references/deliverability.md.


Flaky email in CI

Tests pass locally but the email "hasn't arrived yet" when CI asserts. The four root causes — diagnose all of them, do not just bump the sleep:

  1. A fixed sleep instead of polling. waitForTimeout / arbitrary delay races the email. Replace with expect.poll / .toPass / a built-in waitFor.
  2. Timeout too short. CI mail delivery is slower than local. Once polling, increase the poll timeout (e.g. 30–60s) rather than adding a longer blind sleep.
  3. No recipient filter. Reading the newest message overall picks up another test's mail under parallelism. Filter by sentTo / to: and use a unique address per test.
  4. Stale messages from a previous run. An old matching email satisfies the assertion before the new one arrives. Clear the inbox in global setup and/or make the address unique per run so prior-run mail can't match.

Retrying the whole job, quarantining the test, or raising a global sleep to 30s treats the symptom and leaves the race in place.


Anti-Patterns

1. Fixed sleep before reading the inbox

page.waitForTimeout(5000) / setTimeout / sleep() then read. Too short flakes, too long wastes minutes. Poll with expect.poll against /api/v1/messages (or a built-in waiter).

2. Recommending a dead capture tool

MailHog is archived (2020). Papercut / smtp4dev are weaker for automation. Use Mailpit.

3. Checking the database instead of the email

A DB row proves the write happened, not that the email was sent, addressed, and linkable. Read the actual captured message.

4. Shortcutting past the email

Calling the reset endpoint directly or hardcoding a token skips templating, link generation, and token signing. Capture the email, extract the link, page.goto it.

5. Brittle index-based extraction

body.split(' ')[3], substring(0, 6), indexOf('code'). Use an anchored \d{6} regex with a null guard. And extract from the email body, not the live page's innerText.

6. Newest-message-overall with no recipient filter

messages[0] / messages.at(-1) collide under parallelism. Filter by recipient and use a unique per-test address; "delete all messages between tests" alone does not fix it.

7. Asserting only that an email exists

No subject / from / link checks misses wrong-template and wrong-link bugs. Assert content.

8. Regexing SPF/DKIM/DMARC out of the body, or trusting Mailpit for it

Auth results come from a real receiving server, not body text; Mailpit only does spam scoring. Use Mailosaur's deliverability report, in a separate non-blocking suite.

9. IMAP libraries against a real mailbox

imap-simple / node-imap / imapflow reinvent polling and lose isolation. Use MailSlurp createInbox + waitForLatestEmail, one inbox per test.

10. Ethereal in CI, or a paid service for a local preview

Ethereal delivers nothing — it's preview-only (createTestAccount + getTestMessageUrl). Don't assert on it in CI; equally, don't spin up a paid hosted service just to eyeball a template locally.


Verification

Prove the suite actually captures and asserts, smallest check first:

  • Capture is wired: curl -s localhost:8025/api/v1/messages | jq '.total' returns a number (Mailpit up, API reachable). For a hosted inbox, a one-line messages.get / createInbox smoke script returns without auth error.
  • No blind sleeps: grep -rE 'waitForTimeout|sleep\(|setTimeout' tests/ over the email specs prints nothing.
  • The flow is green and real: run the signup/reset spec and confirm it fails when you temporarily break the template subject — if it still passes, you are not asserting content.
  • Determinism holds: run the email specs with --workers=4 --repeat-each=3; a passing run proves the per-recipient filter survives parallelism.
  • Deliverability is isolated: --grep @deliverability selects only the auth suite, and that CI job is continue-on-error / non-required.

Done When

  • The capture tool is chosen against the decision tree and recorded in .agents/qa-project-context.md (Mailpit for local/CI, a hosted inbox only where a real address is needed).
  • No email test contains waitForTimeout / sleep / setTimeout before reading the inbox — grep -rE 'waitForTimeout|sleep\(|setTimeout' tests/ over the email specs is clean; arrival is awaited via expect.poll / .toPass / a built-in waiter.
  • Each email test uses a unique recipient (plus-address or per-test inbox) and filters reads by that recipient — no messages[0] / messages.at(-1) without a filter.
  • OTP/link extraction uses an anchored regex (\d{6}, https?://...) with a null guard that fails the test on no match.
  • At least the signup-confirmation (or reset / magic-link) flow has a green E2E test that captures the real email and completes the flow through page.goto(link).
  • Content assertions on subject, from, and link domain exist — not just existence.
  • Deliverability (SPF/DKIM/DMARC) tests, if in scope, live in a separate @deliverability suite that is non-blocking in CI.

Related Skills

  • playwright-automation — the browser-driving half of every email flow: forms, navigation, fixtures, and the poll helpers. This skill adds the inbox side.
  • api-testing — go there to test the email provider's API directly or to test that your app sends mail; this skill is about receiving and asserting in an E2E flow.
  • test-data-management — generating unique per-test addresses, factories, and seeded users that feed the recipient strategy here.
  • qa-project-context — records the chosen capture tool, SMTP target, and credentials so every email test shares one configuration.

Reference Files (in references/)

  • mailpit-playwright.md — docker-compose, the expect.poll Mailpit helper, OTP/link extraction utilities, and full password-reset / signup / OTP / magic-link E2E tests.
  • hosted-inboxes.md — Mailosaur (messages.get auto-wait, real addresses, structured links/codes), MailSlurp (createInbox + waitForLatestEmail, per-test inbox), and Ethereal (local preview via createTestAccount + getTestMessageUrl).
  • deliverability.md — SPF/DKIM/DMARC as a separate non-blocking suite, why body-regex and Mailpit don't validate auth, and the Mailosaur deliverability assertion.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Test for WCAG 2.2 AA compliance with axe-core + Playwright, keyboard navigation audits, screen reader testing, ARIA pattern validation, and legal compliance mapping (ADA, EAA, Section 508). Automated tools catch 30-40% of issues — this skill covers automated and manual testing together. Use when: "accessibility," "a11y," "WCAG," "screen reader," "axe," "keyboard navigation," "ARIA," "ADA compliance." Not for: cookie-consent/GDPR compliance — use compliance-testing; pixel-diff visual regression — use visual-testing. Related: playwright-automation, compliance-testing, visual-testing, ci-cd-integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

petrkindlmann/qa-skills1742026年6月11日 更新

Goal-driven E2E testing where a browser agent (Playwright MCP / computer-use) reads a natural-language goal and explores the app via the accessibility tree to assert outcomes — no pre-written script. Covers when intent-driven beats scripted, making agent runs deterministic (pinned model, temperature 0, seeded data, bounded steps, explicit success assertion, snapshot-not-pixel), cost/latency control, the accessibility-tree-first interaction model, CI gating, and graduating a stable run into a scripted Playwright test. Use when: "agentic browser test," "goal-driven browser test," "let an agent explore the app," "natural-language E2E," "browser agent smoke test," "Playwright MCP test." Not for: Writing/maintaining deterministic scripted Playwright tests — that is playwright-automation. Testing your product's OWN LLM features — that is ai-system-testing. Related: playwright-automation, ai-system-testing, exploratory-testing, test-reliability, qa-project-context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

petrkindlmann/qa-skills1742026年6月11日 更新

Hybrid fingerprint + LLM pipeline for bug classification, deduplication, and ticket generation. Normalizes CI logs, creates stable fingerprints, clusters near-duplicates, then uses LLM for severity classification and ticket writing. Includes bug reporting templates and severity/priority matrix. Use when: "bug triage," "classify bugs," "failure analysis," "auto-classify," "CI failures," "bug report," "defect template." Not for: runtime self-healing of one flaky locator — use test-reliability. Not for: designing new tests from production telemetry — use observability-driven-testing. Related: qa-metrics, qa-dashboard, ci-cd-integration, qa-project-context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

petrkindlmann/qa-skills1742026年6月11日 更新

Review EXISTING test code for quality, smells, and testability issues. Detects test smells across six dimensions — readability, reliability, diagnostic value, design, AI-generated, and coverage — analyzes testability of application code, and backs the qualitative smells with mutation testing. Use when: "review my tests," "test quality audit," "test smells," "testability analysis," "are these tests any good." Not for: generating new tests — use `ai-test-generation`. Not for: testing AI features in your product — use `ai-system-testing`. Related: unit-testing, shift-left-testing, coverage-analysis, ai-test-generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

petrkindlmann/qa-skills1742026年6月11日 更新

Test AI/LLM features that ship in your product. Covers prompt regression testing, response quality evaluation, tool-call validation, hallucination and RAG grounding checks, nondeterministic-output strategies, red-team/safety scans, eval frameworks, and agent-as-target injection (indirect injection via tool output / RAG / scan reports, self-propagating payloads, data exfiltration via an agent) plus a bundled detector for untrusted content. Use when: "test our LLM feature," "prompt regression test," "eval framework," "hallucination test," "RAG grounding," "nondeterministic output," "AI feature testing," "red-team our chatbot," "indirect prompt injection," "agent reading untrusted tool output," "production AI quality." Not for: using AI to generate your own test code — use ai-test-generation. Not for: classifying CI failures with AI — use ai-bug-triage. Not for: EU AI Act / GDPR conformity of an AI feature — use compliance-testing. Not for: canary/flag rollout of an AI feature — use testing-in-production. Related: ai-test-generation, ai-qa-review, api-testing, compliance-testing, security-testing, risk-based-testing, test-data-management.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

petrkindlmann/qa-skills1742026年6月11日 更新

Use AI to write NEW test code from specs, PRDs, user stories, code diffs, bug reports, or OpenAPI specs. Staged pipeline: requirements extraction → risk analysis → coverage matrix → scenario generation → oracle design → test code → human review, with guardrails against hallucinated APIs and weak assertions. Use when: "generate tests from spec," "tests from PRD," "tests from user story," "auto-generate test cases," "AI write tests for me." Not for: testing AI/LLM features in your product — use ai-system-testing. Not for: auditing a pre-existing test suite you did not just generate — use ai-qa-review (Step 7 here only reviews tests THIS pipeline produced). Related: playwright-automation, unit-testing, api-testing, qa-project-context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

petrkindlmann/qa-skills1742026年6月11日 更新

petrkindlmann のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する