Audit and improve web accessibility following WCAG 2.1 guidelines. Use when asked to "improve accessibility", "a11y audit", "WCAG compliance", "screen reader support", "keyboard navigation", or "make accessible".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Axis-by-axis interview methodology for establishing engineering performance budgets during architecture PRD compilation. Use when conducting the Step 10.5 performance budget interview in /create-prd-compile.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
This skill owns the interview methodology for establishing concrete, enforceable performance thresholds across all applicable surfaces.
/create-prd-compile Step 10.5 — the performance budget interviewENGINEERING-STANDARDS.md for an existing projectPerformance budgets are written as you go — each axis is discussed, decided, and immediately written to the corresponding subsection of .memory/wiki/specs/ENGINEERING-STANDARDS.md. Do not batch them.
Surface conditioning: Only present axes that apply to the confirmed tech stack surfaces. A CLI-only project skips Web Vitals and bundle-size axes. A web-only project skips Desktop and CLI axes. Always present API and DB axes.
Before any threshold is chosen, anchor all budgets to an explicit operating context. Require named choices — no vague defaults.
| Decision | Options (examples) |
|---|---|
| Target device tier | Low-end Android (Moto G Power), Mid-range (Pixel 7a), High-end (iPhone 15) |
| Target network condition | Slow 3G (400 Kbps, 400 ms RTT), Fast 3G (1.6 Mbps, 150 ms RTT), 4G (9 Mbps, 50 ms RTT), Wi-Fi |
Ask: "What is the lowest-spec device and slowest network your users will realistically use? All budgets will be validated against this baseline."
Write immediately → .memory/wiki/specs/ENGINEERING-STANDARDS.md § ## Performance Budgets baseline note — fill in the [device tier] and [network condition] placeholders.
Define LCP, INP, and CLS targets per page type (e.g., landing, dashboard, detail). Different page types have different acceptable thresholds.
| Page Type | LCP | INP | CLS | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Landing / marketing | ≤ 2.0 s | ≤ 150 ms | ≤ 0.05 | First-impression page; tightest targets |
| Dashboard / data-heavy | ≤ 2.5 s | ≤ 200 ms | ≤ 0.1 | Streaming data acceptable |
| Detail / form | ≤ 2.0 s | ≤ 100 ms | ≤ 0.05 | Interaction-heavy; INP matters most |
Ask: "Which page types does your app have, and do these starting points fit?"
Write immediately → .memory/wiki/specs/ENGINEERING-STANDARDS.md § ### Web Vitals per page type
Define initial and total JS budgets per page type, gzipped.
| Page Type | Initial JS (gzipped) | Total JS (gzipped) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Landing / marketing | ≤ 80 KB | ≤ 150 KB | Must load fast on first visit |
| Dashboard / data-heavy | ≤ 150 KB | ≤ 300 KB | Lazy-load heavy components |
Ask: "Are there pages that pull in large libraries (maps, charts, editors)? Those need their own row."
Write immediately → .memory/wiki/specs/ENGINEERING-STANDARDS.md § ### JS Bundle Size per page type
Define p50, p95, and p99 targets per tier, not a single number for the whole API.
| Tier | Description | p50 | p95 | p99 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — Cached read | Response served from cache (Redis, CDN, in-memory) | ≤ 10 ms | ≤ 30 ms | ≤ 50 ms |
| Tier 2 — Uncached read | Single-entity DB fetch or simple join | ≤ 30 ms | ≤ 80 ms | ≤ 150 ms |
| Tier 3 — Write | Create, update, delete with validation | ≤ 80 ms | ≤ 200 ms | ≤ 400 ms |
| Tier 4 — Background | Async jobs, batch processing, external calls | Best-effort | ≤ 1000 ms | ≤ 3000 ms |
Ask: "Do any endpoints call external services? Those belong in Tier 4. Are there any endpoints that don't fit these four tiers?"
Write immediately → .memory/wiki/specs/ENGINEERING-STANDARDS.md § ### API Response Time per tier
Define p50 and p95 targets per query tier.
| Tier | Description | p50 | p95 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — Indexed point lookup | Primary-key or unique-index fetch | ≤ 5 ms | ≤ 15 ms |
| Tier 2 — Indexed range scan | Range or list query on indexed column | ≤ 15 ms | ≤ 50 ms |
| Tier 3 — Aggregation | COUNT, SUM, GROUP BY, window functions | ≤ 50 ms | ≤ 150 ms |
| Tier 4 — Full-text / vector / analytical | Search, similarity, or reporting queries | ≤ 100 ms | ≤ 300 ms |
Ask: "Are there any known heavy queries (reports, analytics)? Those belong in Tier 4. Any queries that don't fit these four tiers?"
Write immediately → .memory/wiki/specs/ENGINEERING-STANDARDS.md § ### DB Query Time per tier
Define surface-specific budgets using the reference table:
Desktop:
| Metric | Starting point |
|---|---|
| Cold start | ≤ 2 s |
| Memory (idle / active) | ≤ 200 MB / ≤ 500 MB |
| Installer size | ≤ 100 MB |
| Window resize repaint | ≤ 16 ms (60 fps) |
Mobile:
| Metric | Starting point |
|---|---|
| Cold launch | ≤ 1.5 s |
| Warm launch | ≤ 0.5 s |
| Battery drain (active) | ≤ 5 %/hr |
| Download size | ≤ 50 MB |
Ask: "Do these match your target devices and user expectations?"
Write immediately → .memory/wiki/specs/ENGINEERING-STANDARDS.md § ### Desktop surfaces and/or ### Mobile surfaces
For every budget defined in axes 0–5, name the enforcement tool and fail condition.
| Budget Category | Enforcement Tool | Fail Condition | Fail vs. Warn |
|---|---|---|---|
| Web Vitals | Lighthouse CI | Score below threshold | Fail |
| Bundle size | size-limit | Exceeds per-page-type cap | Fail |
| API response time | k6 / autocannon | p95 exceeds tier target | Warn (fail after baseline) |
| DB query time | pgbench / query timer | p95 exceeds tier target | Warn (fail after baseline) |
| Desktop/mobile | Platform profiler | Any metric exceeds threshold | Warn |
Ask: "For API and DB budgets, should CI fail immediately or warn-then-fail after a baseline run?"
Write immediately → .memory/wiki/specs/ENGINEERING-STANDARDS.md § ### CI Enforcement
Summarise all confirmed performance budgets. Ask: "Any axis you want to tighten, loosen, or add?"
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Audit and improve web accessibility following WCAG 2.1 guidelines. Use when asked to "improve accessibility", "a11y audit", "WCAG compliance", "screen reader support", "keyboard navigation", or "make accessible".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured methodology for adversarial thinking — generating attack scenarios, abuse cases, race conditions, and security edge cases against specs and implementations. Produces spec-level gap items, not code-level fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate multiple Antigravity skills through guided workflows for SaaS MVP delivery, security audits, AI agent builds, and browser QA.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Master REST and GraphQL API design principles to build intuitive, scalable, and maintainable APIs that delight developers. Use when designing new APIs, reviewing API specifications, or establishing API design standards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manage API versioning and evolution with URL/header/query strategies, deprecation workflows, breaking change classification, sunset headers, and consumer-driven contract testing. Use when designing versioning strategy, deprecating endpoints, or evolving API contracts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes codebase structure, data flow, module relationships, and key patterns to generate and maintain a living architecture document (ARCHITECTURE.md).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。