Audit and improve web accessibility following WCAG 2.1 guidelines. Use when asked to "improve accessibility", "a11y audit", "WCAG compliance", "screen reader support", "keyboard navigation", or "make accessible".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Document templates for all pipeline output documents — specs, indexes, reports, and strategy docs. Use when any workflow needs to produce a structured document.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Canonical markdown templates for all pipeline output documents. Workflows reference these templates instead of inlining them — the template defines structure, the workflow fills content.
Dated File Convention: Compiled artifacts (e.g., architecture-design.md, data-placement-strategy.md, ENGINEERING-STANDARDS.md, audit reports) are always prefixed with YYYY-MM-DD-. Any workflow reading these files must use a glob pattern (e.g., .memory/wiki/specs/*-architecture-design.md). See docs/kit-architecture.md Section 3 — Dated File Convention for the full rule and table. Note: ideation-index.md and vision.md are NOT dated — they are living documents updated throughout ideation.
references/| Template | File | Used By |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture Design | references/architecture-design-template.md | /create-prd-compile Step 10 |
| Engineering Standards | references/engineering-standards-template.md | /create-prd-compile Step 11 |
| Vision Document | references/vision-template.md | /ideate-validate Step 11 |
| BE Spec + Seed Stub | references/be-spec-template.md | /write-be-spec-write Step 7, /write-be-spec-classify |
| FE Spec + Seed Stub | references/fe-spec-template.md | /write-fe-spec-write Step 6, /write-fe-spec-classify |
| Data Placement Strategy | references/data-placement-template.md | /create-prd-architecture Step 5 |
| Design System Decision Options | references/design-system-decisions.md | /create-prd-design-system Step 1 (option menus + output template); downstream: write-fe-spec-classify Step 0.75 prerequisite check |
| Infrastructure Report | references/infrastructure-report-template.md | /verify-infrastructure Steps 0.6, 8 |
| Decomposition (shards + indexes) | references/decomposition-templates.md | /decompose-architecture-structure Steps 5-9 |
| Operational (slices, remediation, skills, sync) | references/operational-templates.md | /plan-phase, /remediate-pipeline-assess, /bootstrap-agents-provision, /sync-kit |
Template depth rule: Section headings in templates are MINIMUM headings, not maximum content. Each section must contain the full detail gathered during prior steps. If a section is under 200 words, it's almost certainly too shallow. Apply the two-implementer test: could a developer interpret this two different ways? If yes, add more detail.
Run this procedure when filling the ## Features section of each shard skeleton during /decompose-architecture-structure.
Read .memory/wiki/specs/ideation/ideation-index.md — specifically the ## Structural Classification and ## Structure Map sections.
*-index.md (children table + Role Matrix), *-cx.md (cross-cuts), and child feature .md files..memory/wiki/specs/ideation/surfaces/{surface-name}/ (surface-exclusive) or .memory/wiki/specs/ideation/domains/ (shared).Match each shard to its ideation domain by name. Walk the domain's fractal tree: read the domain index for the children list, then read each child feature file to extract sub-features. If the domain has sub-domain folders, recurse into them.
Extract every Level-1 sub-feature as a concrete capability a user would recognise, written in actor + goal format with primary data noted.
Example: "Creator can upload a video → primary data: media asset"
Do NOT use architecture-level headlines or implementation details.
List sub-features as bullet points in the ## Features section. Group by functional area if the ideation content suggests natural groupings.
[THIN — review with user] Fallback RuleIf a shard's domain has no corresponding ideation domain folder (the domain was introduced during architecture design, not ideation — check the ideation-index.md Structure Map for paths under domains/ and surfaces/), mark the skeleton with [THIN — review with user] at the top of ## Features and seed from the architecture design description instead.
At the validation step, the user must confirm whether to:
Seeded skeletons always live in the flat .memory/wiki/specs/ia/ directory — IA is shared across all surfaces. Multi-product projects add per-surface BE and FE directories only:
Single-surface:
.memory/wiki/specs/ia/
├── 00-infrastructure.md
├── 01-user-accounts.md ← ## Features seeded from ideation/domains/01-user-accounts/ (index + feature files)
├── 02-content-library.md ← ## Features seeded from ideation/domains/02-content-library/ (index + feature files)
├── ...
Multi-product (IA stays flat — only BE/FE get per-surface directories):
.memory/wiki/specs/ia/
├── 00-infrastructure.md
├── 01-operations.md ← ## Features seeded from ideation/surfaces/desktop/01-operations/ (index + feature files)
├── 02-device-history.md ← ## Features seeded from ideation/domains/02-device-history/ (index + feature files)
.memory/wiki/specs/be/desktop/ ← per-surface BE specs (inside be/)
.memory/wiki/specs/fe/desktop/ ← per-surface FE specs (inside fe/)
.memory/wiki/specs/be/ ← shared BE specs (pre-scaffolded, serves as shared surface)
.memory/wiki/specs/fe/ ← shared FE specs (pre-scaffolded, serves as shared surface)
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Audit and improve web accessibility following WCAG 2.1 guidelines. Use when asked to "improve accessibility", "a11y audit", "WCAG compliance", "screen reader support", "keyboard navigation", or "make accessible".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured methodology for adversarial thinking — generating attack scenarios, abuse cases, race conditions, and security edge cases against specs and implementations. Produces spec-level gap items, not code-level fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate multiple Antigravity skills through guided workflows for SaaS MVP delivery, security audits, AI agent builds, and browser QA.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Master REST and GraphQL API design principles to build intuitive, scalable, and maintainable APIs that delight developers. Use when designing new APIs, reviewing API specifications, or establishing API design standards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manage API versioning and evolution with URL/header/query strategies, deprecation workflows, breaking change classification, sunset headers, and consumer-driven contract testing. Use when designing versioning strategy, deprecating endpoints, or evolving API contracts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes codebase structure, data flow, module relationships, and key patterns to generate and maintain a living architecture document (ARCHITECTURE.md).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。