本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

testing-strategist

Design and implement comprehensive testing strategies. Use when setting up tests, choosing test types, implementing TDD, or improving code quality. Covers unit tests, integration tests, E2E tests, test-driven development, and testing best practices.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md8.4 KB
  • references/typescript.md8.0 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Testing Strategist

Test the right things at the right level — write tests that give you confidence to ship.

Stack-Specific References

After reading the methodology below, read the reference matching your surface's Languages column in the surface stack map (.agents/instructions/tech-stack.md):

LanguageReference
TypeScript / JavaScriptreferences/typescript.md
Pythonreferences/python.md
Goreferences/go.md
Rustreferences/rust.md

Core Principle

The Testing Pyramid: 70% unit tests, 20% integration tests, 10% E2E tests.

Tests should be:

  • Fast — Run in milliseconds (unit) to seconds (integration) to minutes (E2E)
  • Isolated — Test one thing at a time
  • Repeatable — Same input = same output
  • Self-checking — Pass/fail automatically, no manual verification
  • Timely — Written alongside code (or before, with TDD)

The Testing Pyramid

           /\
          /  \         E2E Tests (10%)
         /----\        - Slow, brittle, expensive
        /      \       - Test critical user journeys
       /--------\      - Example: "User can complete checkout"
      /          \
     /------------\    Integration Tests (20%)
    /              \   - Medium speed, test components together
   /----------------\  - Example: "API endpoint returns correct data"
  /                  \
 /--------------------\ Unit Tests (70%)
/______________________\ - Fast, isolated, test functions/components
                        - Example: "calculateTotal returns sum"

Why This Ratio?

  • Unit tests: Fast feedback, pinpoint bugs precisely, easy to maintain
  • Integration tests: Ensure components work together, catch interface issues
  • E2E tests: Verify actual user flows, catch UI bugs, but slow and brittle

Level 1: Unit Tests (70%)

What to Test

Test individual functions, components, or classes in isolation.

Good candidates:

  • ✅ Business logic functions (calculations, validation, transformations)
  • ✅ Utility functions (formatting, parsing, etc.)
  • ✅ UI components (rendering, props, state)
  • ✅ Pure functions (same input = same output)

Skip:

  • ❌ Third-party libraries (assume they work)
  • ❌ Framework internals
  • ❌ Simple getters/setters with no logic

Unit Test Best Practices

✅ Do:

  • Test behavior, not implementation
  • Use descriptive test names
  • Follow AAA pattern: Arrange, Act, Assert
  • Test edge cases (empty, null, negative, boundary values)
  • Keep tests simple and readable

❌ Don't:

  • Test private methods directly
  • Over-mock (makes tests brittle)
  • Test framework internals
  • Write tests that depend on other tests

Level 2: Integration Tests (20%)

What to Test

Test multiple units working together — typically API routes, database operations, or service integrations.

Good candidates:

  • ✅ API endpoints (request → handler → database → response)
  • ✅ Database operations (queries, transactions)
  • ✅ Third-party integrations (payment, email, etc.)
  • ✅ Authentication flows
  • ✅ File upload/download

Integration Test Best Practices

✅ Do:

  • Use test database (separate from development/production)
  • Clean up test data before/after each test
  • Test happy path + error cases
  • Test authentication/authorization
  • Use factories/fixtures for test data

❌ Don't:

  • Test against production database
  • Leave test data behind
  • Mock database (defeats purpose of integration test)
  • Depend on external services (mock external APIs)

Level 3: E2E Tests (10%)

What to Test

Test complete user journeys through the actual UI.

Good candidates:

  • ✅ Critical user flows (signup, login, checkout)
  • ✅ Core business processes
  • ✅ Multi-step workflows

Skip:

  • ❌ Every possible UI interaction (too slow/brittle)
  • ❌ Edge cases (cover with unit/integration tests)

E2E Test Best Practices

✅ Do:

  • Test critical paths only (< 20 tests)
  • Use stable selectors (test IDs, roles, labels — not CSS classes)
  • Run in CI/CD pipeline
  • Test across browsers if web surface
  • Take screenshots on failure

❌ Don't:

  • Test every UI variation
  • Use fragile selectors (nth-child, CSS classes)
  • Run E2E tests on every commit (too slow)
  • Ignore flaky tests (fix or remove them)

Test-Driven Development (TDD)

The Red-Green-Refactor Cycle

  1. Red: Write a failing test that defines expected behavior
  2. Green: Write minimal code to make it pass
  3. Refactor: Improve code while keeping tests green

When to Use TDD

Good for:

  • ✅ Complex business logic
  • ✅ Bug fixes (write test that reproduces bug first)
  • ✅ Well-defined requirements
  • ✅ Critical algorithms

Skip for:

  • ❌ Exploratory coding (don't know requirements yet)
  • ❌ Throwaway prototypes
  • ❌ Simple CRUD operations

Mocking Strategies

When to Mock

  • ✅ External APIs (slow, unreliable, cost money)
  • ✅ Time/randomness (make tests deterministic)
  • ✅ File system operations
  • ✅ Database (in unit tests only — NEVER in integration tests)

Anti-Mock-Abuse Rules

  1. Never mock what you own — if you wrote the module, test it directly
  2. One mock = one boundary — only mock at the boundary between your code and external systems
  3. Verify mock interactions — assert that mocked deps were called with correct arguments
  4. Mock return values, not internals — mock the return value, not the internal implementation

Mocking Best Practices

✅ Do:

  • Mock at boundaries (APIs, file system, network)
  • Restore mocks after tests
  • Make mocks realistic (same shape as real data)

❌ Don't:

  • Over-mock (makes tests brittle and meaningless)
  • Mock your own code (test real behavior)
  • Leave mocks unreset between tests

Assertion Depth Rules

❌ Shallow Assertions (BANNED)

Assertions that prove nothing about correctness:

  • "Result is defined" — undefined would also be defined
  • "Result is truthy" — empty arrays and objects are truthy
  • "Status is 200" alone — doesn't verify response body

✅ Deep Assertions (REQUIRED)

Every test must assert:

  1. The correct output — specific values, not just types
  2. The correct side effects — what changed in the system
  3. The correct error behavior — specific error type and message

Code Coverage

Coverage Targets

  • 70% minimum — Below this, you're missing important tests
  • 80% good — Solid coverage of critical paths
  • 90%+ diminishing returns — Chasing 100% often not worth it

What to Focus On

High priority (90%+ coverage):

  • Business logic
  • Authentication/authorization
  • Payment processing
  • Data validation

Medium priority (70%+):

  • API routes
  • Database queries
  • Utility functions

Low priority (okay to skip):

  • UI components (test behavior, not rendering)
  • Configuration files
  • Type definitions

Common Testing Patterns

Testing Async Code

Write tests that properly wait for async operations to complete before asserting. Use your framework's async test utilities.

Testing Error Handling

Mock dependencies to throw errors, then assert your code handles them correctly — shows the right error message, returns the right status code, logs appropriately.

Testing Forms

Fill form fields programmatically, submit, and assert both the submission data and any validation errors.


Test Organization

File Structure

Tests co-locate with source files:

source-file.ext      → source-file.test.ext     (unit tests)
route-handler.ext    → route-handler.test.ext   (integration tests)
e2e/                 → feature-name.e2e.ext     (E2E tests)

Naming Conventions

  • Unit/Integration: *.test.* or *.spec.*
  • E2E: *.e2e.* or *.spec.* (in tests/e2e/)
  • Test names should describe behavior: "returns X when Y" or "throws error for invalid input"

When to Use This Skill

  • ✅ Setting up testing for new project
  • ✅ Choosing test frameworks
  • ✅ Deciding what to test and at what level
  • ✅ Implementing TDD
  • ✅ Improving code coverage
  • ✅ Fixing flaky tests

Good tests give you confidence to ship. ✅

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Audit and improve web accessibility following WCAG 2.1 guidelines. Use when asked to "improve accessibility", "a11y audit", "WCAG compliance", "screen reader support", "keyboard navigation", or "make accessible".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

RepairYourTech/cfsa-antigravity62026年8月16日 更新

Structured methodology for adversarial thinking — generating attack scenarios, abuse cases, race conditions, and security edge cases against specs and implementations. Produces spec-level gap items, not code-level fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

RepairYourTech/cfsa-antigravity62026年8月16日 更新

Orchestrate multiple Antigravity skills through guided workflows for SaaS MVP delivery, security audits, AI agent builds, and browser QA.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

RepairYourTech/cfsa-antigravity62026年8月16日 更新

Master REST and GraphQL API design principles to build intuitive, scalable, and maintainable APIs that delight developers. Use when designing new APIs, reviewing API specifications, or establishing API design standards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

RepairYourTech/cfsa-antigravity62026年8月16日 更新

Manage API versioning and evolution with URL/header/query strategies, deprecation workflows, breaking change classification, sunset headers, and consumer-driven contract testing. Use when designing versioning strategy, deprecating endpoints, or evolving API contracts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

RepairYourTech/cfsa-antigravity62026年8月16日 更新

Analyzes codebase structure, data flow, module relationships, and key patterns to generate and maintain a living architecture document (ARCHITECTURE.md).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

RepairYourTech/cfsa-antigravity62026年8月16日 更新

RepairYourTech のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する