本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

write-fe-spec-write

Author FE spec files, update indexes/tracker, run deepening and ambiguity gates, and enforce navigation completeness before plan-phase handoff

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md4.2 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Overview

Prerequisites

  1. FE spec seed stub exists with classification and source inventories
  2. Classify shard has explicit user approval

Step-by-Step

Step 1 — Re-run handling and FE spec authoring

  1. Detect existing authored content and handle continue vs targeted redo.
  2. Write FE spec sections using FE template and conventions.
  3. Include split-group metadata for split-origin specs when applicable.

Step 2 — Content completeness floor (replaces line-count gate)

For every component, view, and form, verify all of: state enumeration (idle/loading/error-per-class/empty/success/optimistic-pending/optimistic-rollback/disabled/degraded), role variants matrix with no empty cells (full/read-only/partial-hidden/disabled/not-rendered with specific fields/actions), form fields with validation + error copy + on-blur vs on-submit behavior, empty/loading/error UI copy + retry affordances, responsive interaction-behavior changes per breakpoint, accessibility inventory per interactive element (keyboard binding + focus order + screen-reader text + ARIA), navigation (back/deep-link/bookmark/multi-tab/unsaved-changes), and network-degradation behavior (loading-threshold + retry + offline).

Hard gate: any missing cell on any component blocks the spec from advancing. Inheritance from design system must be cited per component; "implicit" is not allowed. Length is informational only.

Step 3 — Index and tracker updates

  1. Update .memory/wiki/specs/fe/index.md status.
  2. Update FE completion state in .memory/pipeline/progress/spec-pipeline.md via protocol.

Step 4 — Iterative deepening passes

Run multi-pass refinement (passes 1–7 mandatory, 8–10 conditional, hard stop after 10):

  1. state synchronization and source-of-truth behavior
  2. degraded network behavior and retry semantics
  3. user-flow sequencing and persistence behavior
  4. responsive/touch interaction gap analysis
  5. state enumeration completeness (per-class error UI, optimistic states, degraded states, transition triggers, persistence across nav)
  6. role-conditional rendering exhaustion (role × component matrix with no empty cells; specify hidden fields, disabled actions, layout-slot collapse)
  7. accessibility edge-case enumeration (keyboard, focus management, screen-reader announcements, color/contrast, motion preferences) 8–10. additional convergence passes if prior pass produced significant additions

Step 5 — Cross-reference + ambiguity gates

  1. Verify links to BE source, IA source, and related FE specs.
  2. Verify citations for cross-shard material.
  3. Run micro/macro ambiguity checks + two-implementer + devil's-advocate passes.
  4. If final FE spec, run /audit-ambiguity fe before plan-phase recommendation.

Step 6 — Dependency/bootstrap, ledger, and navigation completeness

  1. Detect new FE dependencies and run bootstrap + verification when needed.
  2. Update feature ledger FE coverage when ledger exists.
  3. If all FE specs complete, run navigation completeness check and resolve orphan routes.

Step 7 — Graph refresh, review request, and constrained next-step recommendation

  1. Run Protocol 8 fully, including mandatory memory_compile graph refresh after tracker verification.
  2. Present:
  • spec link(s)
  • cross-reference verification status
  • ambiguity gate status
  • spec graph refresh confirmation
  • pipeline state and allowed next command

Completion Checklist

  • FE spec fully authored
  • complexity gate handled
  • FE index updated
  • pipeline tracker updated
  • deepening passes completed
  • ambiguity gate completed
  • dependency bootstrap checks handled
  • feature ledger FE coverage updated (if present)
  • navigation completeness check passed when final FE spec
  • spec graph refreshed via memory_compile
  • review requested with constrained next-step options

Next Steps

  • if FE specs remain: /write-fe-spec
  • if FE complete and all gates pass: /plan-phase

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Audit and improve web accessibility following WCAG 2.1 guidelines. Use when asked to "improve accessibility", "a11y audit", "WCAG compliance", "screen reader support", "keyboard navigation", or "make accessible".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

RepairYourTech/cfsa-antigravity62026年8月16日 更新

Structured methodology for adversarial thinking — generating attack scenarios, abuse cases, race conditions, and security edge cases against specs and implementations. Produces spec-level gap items, not code-level fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

RepairYourTech/cfsa-antigravity62026年8月16日 更新

Orchestrate multiple Antigravity skills through guided workflows for SaaS MVP delivery, security audits, AI agent builds, and browser QA.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

RepairYourTech/cfsa-antigravity62026年8月16日 更新

Master REST and GraphQL API design principles to build intuitive, scalable, and maintainable APIs that delight developers. Use when designing new APIs, reviewing API specifications, or establishing API design standards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

RepairYourTech/cfsa-antigravity62026年8月16日 更新

Manage API versioning and evolution with URL/header/query strategies, deprecation workflows, breaking change classification, sunset headers, and consumer-driven contract testing. Use when designing versioning strategy, deprecating endpoints, or evolving API contracts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

RepairYourTech/cfsa-antigravity62026年8月16日 更新

Analyzes codebase structure, data flow, module relationships, and key patterns to generate and maintain a living architecture document (ARCHITECTURE.md).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

RepairYourTech/cfsa-antigravity62026年8月16日 更新

RepairYourTech のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する