本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

intake

Use when raw intent must be captured and routed to the right next state.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md2.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

intake

Lifecycle stage: INTAKE

Trigger

Use when a request is vague, new, or missing context.

When not to use

Do not use when this trigger is absent; choose the command or skill that owns the requested state, artifact, and verification gate.

Inputs

  • User request or current artifact.
  • Known constraints and context.
  • Relevant evidence or source links, if available.
  • Current Agent Brain state.

Procedure

  1. State the current state and target artifact.
  2. Identify missing blockers and ask at most three blocking questions.
  3. Separate facts, assumptions, hypotheses, and open questions.
  4. Apply the anti-rationalization table below.
  5. Produce the required artifact: Intake Summary.
  6. Add evidence, risks, decision, and next state.

Anti-Rationalization

ShortcutRebuttal
"This is obvious."Write the assumption and evidence. If you cannot, it is not obvious.
"We can do this later."If the missing step changes the decision, do it now or state the risk.
"The user wants speed."Reduce scope; do not skip the quality bar.
"This does not need verification."Every important claim or behavior needs proof.

Verification

  • Required artifact exists and is named.
  • Facts, assumptions, and open questions are separated.
  • Evidence or evidence gaps are explicit.
  • Next state is stated.
  • Stop conditions are honored.

Output Artifact

Intake Summary

Use templates/intake-summary.md. The artifact should be concise, auditable, and include evidence, blockers, and next action so another agent can resume.

Failure Modes

  • Producing advice instead of an artifact.
  • Accepting user assumptions without challenge.
  • Skipping evidence because the task feels simple.
  • Recommending an agent when a simpler system is enough.
  • Hiding risks or open questions.

Example

Trigger: raw request enters the harness. Action: capture facts, assumptions, constraints, missing evidence, approval state, and likely next command before deeper work. Output artifact: templates/intake-summary.md with blockers and next action. Verification: cite routing evidence and the safest noninteractive default when follow-up is impossible.

A user says, "Make the harness better." Intake should capture known facts, assumptions, constraints, missing evidence, approval state, and likely next command; in a scheduled run, choose the safest documented default and create an intake summary rather than asking a broad follow-up.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Use when the user needs a standup-ready summary of recent project activity from local evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

rohitg00/agentbrain402026年5月27日 更新

Use when a command, adapter, or runtime smoke depends on proving an agent runtime's capabilities before trusting command routing, writes, shell access, or validation claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

rohitg00/agentbrain402026年5月27日 更新

Use when agent-produced work needs a safety, evidence, and reliability check before handoff, merge, or trust.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

rohitg00/agentbrain402026年5月27日 更新

Use when an output artifact, template, schema, example, or handoff field must stay aligned across commands, skills, docs, and validators.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

rohitg00/agentbrain402026年5月27日 更新

Agent Brain /brain-brief: after intake, research, and grill have enough signal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

rohitg00/agentbrain402026年5月27日 更新

Agent Brain /brain-build: an implementation plan has a selected task and validation method.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

rohitg00/agentbrain402026年5月27日 更新

rohitg00 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する