<What this skill does>
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Get a second opinion or independent review from Codex (OpenAI) via the local Codex CLI. Use when the user wants Codex to review a design memo, PR, diff, or decision, or to cross-check an approach from another model. Also trigger on "Codexに聞いて", "Codexと相談", "Codexにレビュー", "Codexの意見", "別のモデルで確認".
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Delegate a focused question or review to Codex (OpenAI's CLI) and relay its answer back to the user as an independent, attributed second opinion.
This skill does not replace your own judgment — it gathers Codex's view so the user can compare it against yours (and against other reviewers such as Antigravity).
The repository ships a project-local Codex config (.codex/config.toml) and a
wrapper script. Always call Codex through the script so the project config and
working directory are correct:
npm run codex:exec -- "<prompt>"
This runs codex exec non-interactively (CODEX_HOME=.codex, -C <repo root>)
and prints Codex's answer to stdout. Codex runs in the repo, so it can read
files itself — reference paths in the prompt instead of pasting large files.
Frame the prompt. Turn the user's request into a single self-contained prompt for Codex. Include:
docs/development/1255-…md,
runners/core/review-runner.mjs),Run Codex with a generous timeout (design reviews can take minutes).
Set the timeout on the Bash tool call itself (e.g. timeout: 600000 ms) —
do not prefix the command with timeout 600: macOS ships no GNU
timeout binary, so that prefix fails with command not found.
npm run codex:exec -- "<prompt>"
Handle authentication failure. If the output contains
401 Unauthorized / Missing bearer / Reconnecting..., Codex is not
authenticated. Do not retry blindly. Tell the user to authenticate
themselves in this session (these are interactive / secret-bearing and you
cannot run them for them):
! CODEX_HOME="$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)/.codex" codex login
(the CODEX_HOME prefix is required — a bare codex login writes
credentials to ~/.codex and the project-local config keeps failing), orOPENAI_API_KEY in the environment (warn that pasting a key into chat
leaves it in history; prefer env/keychain).
Then offer to re-run once authenticated.Relay faithfully. Quote or summarize Codex's answer and attribute it to Codex ("Codex の見解:"). Keep Codex's conclusion distinct from your own. If you disagree, say so separately — do not silently overwrite its opinion.
Persist when useful. For design decisions, offer to record Codex's verdict in the relevant memo / issue / PR so it is not lost.
.env contents into the Codex prompt.workspace-write sandbox; treat its file edits as
proposals to review, not as automatically trusted changes.まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
<What this skill does>
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
画像・ボタン・フォーム要素に適切なアクセシブルネームがあるか確認する。
Ensure ADRs capture context, decision, alternatives, tradeoffs, and follow-ups in a way that prevents future drift.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
敵対的分析手法を統合したレビューの entry skill。認知バイアス対策の3手法 (Pre-mortem / War Game / Logic Torturing)と、宣言・主張と実態の乖離を突く claim-vs-actual 検出3パターン(Self-Contradiction / Refactor-Claim Audit / Cross-File Leakage)へルーティングし、通常のレビューでは見えない設計の盲点・ 防御の穴・論理の弱点・宣言と実装のズレを可視化する。
Review changes to the Agent Skills import/export bridge for path safety, round-trip fidelity, and validation correctness.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Checks whether AI-assisted work defines review criteria, accessible context, explicit review loop, human judgment boundary, and feedback capture before delegating to an agent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。