無料GitHub で公開

consult

Bring how named experts would think about the question. Use when the user wants expert thinking on a tradeoff, choice, or stuck problem — not a verdict.

saadshahd/moo.md

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル（94）

SKILL.md1.7 KB
profiles/abramov.md2.4 KB
profiles/alexander.md1.7 KB
profiles/appleton.md2.7 KB
profiles/armstrong.md2.9 KB
profiles/beck.md3.4 KB
profiles/bloch.md4.8 KB
profiles/boyd.md1.8 KB
profiles/brander.md2.7 KB
profiles/bruner.md1.8 KB
profiles/cagan.md2.2 KB
profiles/case.md2.5 KB
profiles/cherny.md5.5 KB
profiles/cook.md2.8 KB
profiles/cox.md5.4 KB
profiles/dawkins.md1.9 KB
profiles/deming.md1.8 KB
profiles/dhh.md4.9 KB
profiles/evans.md1.6 KB
profiles/feathers.md1.7 KB
profiles/fielding.md1.7 KB
profiles/fogg.md1.6 KB
profiles/forsgren.md6.0 KB
profiles/fowler.md3.1 KB
profiles/freeman.md1.4 KB
profiles/frost.md2.6 KB
profiles/geertz.md2.0 KB
profiles/goldratt.md1.9 KB
profiles/goodhart.md2.0 KB
profiles/graham.md2.9 KB
profiles/gregg.md2.5 KB
profiles/helland.md6.0 KB
profiles/hettinger.md1.6 KB
profiles/hickey.md2.5 KB
profiles/hightower.md2.7 KB
profiles/hughes.md5.3 KB
profiles/humble.md1.6 KB
profiles/huyen.md5.6 KB
profiles/inkandswitch.md2.4 KB
profiles/jacobs.md1.7 KB
profiles/jobs.md1.6 KB
profiles/kahneman.md2.0 KB
profiles/karpathy.md5.2 KB
profiles/kauffman.md3.9 KB
profiles/kay.md1.9 KB
profiles/khorshid.md2.9 KB
profiles/king.md2.6 KB
profiles/klein.md4.0 KB
profiles/kleppmann.md3.0 KB
profiles/kuhn.md2.3 KB
profiles/lamport.md1.9 KB
profiles/litt.md3.1 KB
profiles/majors.md3.0 KB
profiles/martin.md1.6 KB
profiles/matuschak.md3.0 KB
profiles/meadows.md2.0 KB
profiles/milewski.md1.6 KB
profiles/minto.md1.6 KB
profiles/muratori.md5.2 KB
profiles/newman.md1.5 KB
profiles/norman.md1.5 KB
profiles/nygard.md4.9 KB
profiles/orwell.md1.6 KB
profiles/osmani.md2.0 KB
profiles/ostrom.md1.8 KB
profiles/ousterhout.md3.2 KB
profiles/papert.md1.6 KB
profiles/pavlo.md5.3 KB
profiles/perrow.md1.7 KB
profiles/perry.md2.8 KB
profiles/pike.md1.5 KB
profiles/popper.md1.8 KB
profiles/reason.md2.0 KB
profiles/rumelt.md1.9 KB
profiles/sadalage.md5.3 KB
profiles/schneier.md4.2 KB
profiles/scott.md2.0 KB
profiles/shostack.md4.5 KB
profiles/simon.md1.9 KB
profiles/simpson.md1.9 KB
profiles/skelton-pais.md5.6 KB
profiles/snowden.md3.6 KB
profiles/soueidan.md2.8 KB
profiles/tufte.md2.0 KB
profiles/vaughan.md4.0 KB
profiles/vergnaud.md4.9 KB
profiles/vernon.md1.6 KB
profiles/victor.md1.8 KB
profiles/vygotsky.md2.1 KB
profiles/wathan.md2.0 KB
profiles/willison.md2.5 KB
profiles/wittgenstein.md2.1 KB
profiles/young.md5.0 KB
profiles/zhuo.md2.6 KB

SKILL.md（原文）

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Pick

Take the experts the user names. Where they name none, or the question needs an angle theirs miss, read profiles/ and add one or two whose work bears on it — each bringing a different idea to try, not a side in an argument.

Ideas

Three to five ideas across the panel. The reply opens on idea 1 — no preamble, no method, no note on sources or counts:

1. <Expert> — **<the change>**
   *<why, in their voice>*

The change alone is bold: it is what the user acts on. The name stays plain, the why italic.

The change is concrete: what to cut, add, or swap in the thing in question.
The why is one clause: what that expert would see in this thing, judged on the matter in hand. Their way of thinking, applied — never a record of what they did, a count from their catalogue, or a title of their work.
No line past 72 characters; a line that won't fit is saying two things.
A number appears only where the idea is the number.
Where the thing already exists, each idea is an A/B against it. One line after the ideas says how a pick wins, as Win: <one clause>. An idea judged another way carries its own win: line under its why, never in the shared one.

Result

The ideas, then the question alone on its last line: Build all <N>? Nothing else, not even a recommendation: choosing is the user's.

The question has one retrievable answer → retrieve it; stating a fact needs no expert. The user wants a verdict on something that exists → use judge skill. The user wants a proposal they already committed to attacked → use interrogate skill.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

ログインしてレビューを書く

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

anchor

無料

Rewrite a rule so anyone applies it the same way. Use when a stated rule or claim takes the reader's judgment to apply.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。