本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

diverge

Generates 3-5 conceptually distinct approaches (Novel, Surprising, Diverse, Conventional) and holds for selection before implementing. Use before committing to an approach when a task has more than one non-obvious solution; --codex delegates the brainstorm to a fresh subagent.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(3)

  • SKILL.md6.5 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml238 B
  • references/creative-preference-optimization.md2.9 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Diverge

Interrupt the default path of jumping to the most probable — and least creative — solution.

Heritage and scope

An original Open Science Skills workflow grounded in Creative Preference Optimization (Ismayilzada et al., 2025; background in references/creative-preference-optimization.md). Standard preference alignment (RLHF/DPO) optimizes for the most human-expected output, which is by construction the least surprising one. The paper's most accessible remedy — its own "brainstorm-then-select" baseline — needs no fine-tuning: force divergence before convergence, require that at least one approach is surprising and one is novel, and defer quality and implementation until after selection.

Read the background note only when the user asks for the rationale or when refining the creativity criteria.

Use it wherever more than one non-obvious solution exists — creative, architectural, or analytical work — and not for rote tasks with one correct answer (fix this syntax error).

When the task itself is still underspecified (goal, constraints, success criteria unsettled), interview before diverging. For research tasks, research-grill resolves the decision tree the approaches must answer to; it descends from Matt Pocock's grill-me (see RECOMMENDED.md in the library repository). Grilling settles the question, and diverge generates genuinely distinct answers to a settled one.

Model. The default mode runs in the current session. For a demanding --codex brainstorm, use gpt-6-astra at high for the fresh worker if the tool exposes model and effort overrides (xhigh for the write-capable implementation turn); pass a self-contained brief with fork_turns="none" where supported. Otherwise the worker inherits the lead, and the report must name that limitation. A routine brainstorm can retain the current model. A fresh context reduces anchoring but does not establish independent model-family evidence. Claude Code's /oss:diverge --codex explicitly launches Astra through the CLI.

Behavior

Given the task supplied with the invocation:

Step 1 — Clarify if needed

If the task is ambiguous about what "good" looks like, ask one round of goal questions — the frontier of what blocks generation now, numbered, each with your recommended answer; questions about the goal, never the implementation. One round, then generate: a task that needs a second round needs the full interview (research-grill, see Heritage), not this skill. Skip this entirely if the goal is clear.

Step 2 — Generate approaches

Produce 3–5 approaches that differ in underlying mechanism, not surface vocabulary. At least one must be [Surprising] and at least one [Novel]. Label each with its primary creativity dimension:

  • [Novel] — semantically far from the conventional solution; different conceptual basis
  • [Surprising] — violates the obvious assumption about how this should work; would not be the first answer
  • [Diverse] — maximally different from the other approaches in this list
  • [Conventional] — the expected path, included as a reference point

For each approach provide:

  1. Core mechanism — one sentence naming the key insight
  2. How it works — two to three sentences on the mechanism and what makes it distinct
  3. Main tradeoff — one sentence

Step 3 — Hold

Do not implement. Present all approaches, then ask:

"Which approach should I pursue? Or should I synthesize elements from multiple?"

After selection

Implement the selected approach directly. If the user asks to synthesize, identify which elements are mechanically compatible and propose a brief hybrid plan before implementing.

Codex mode (--codex)

A fresh subagent reduces anchoring from the lead agent's conversation history. The specification above is unchanged — the subagent generates the approaches and, after selection, implements the chosen one.

Gate the delegation

Delegate only when the user passes --codex or asks for a subagent, an independent context, or a delegated brainstorm; otherwise run the local workflow.

Phase 1: brief the brainstormer

Extract the task, hard constraints, existing artifacts, and acceptance criteria. Spawn one fresh Codex subagent with only the task-local context it needs, withholding your own preferred solution or likely implementation. Give it this contract:

Generate 3–5 conceptually distinct approaches to TASK. Do not implement.

Label every approach [Novel], [Surprising], [Diverse], or [Conventional].
Include at least one [Novel] and one [Surprising] approach. For each, provide:
1. Core mechanism — one sentence.
2. How it works and why it differs — two or three sentences.
3. Main tradeoff — one sentence.

Do not restate one idea with different vocabulary. Return only the approaches.

Phase 2: present and pause

Check that the response contains 3–5 mechanically distinct approaches and satisfies the required labels. If it does not, send one focused correction to the same subagent.

Present the approaches without silently ranking, filtering, or rewriting them. Ask the user to select one approach or request a compatible synthesis. Stop before implementation.

Phase 3: implement after selection

Send the selected approach, original task, constraints, and acceptance checks back to the same subagent when possible. Require it to implement the user's selected mechanism rather than substituting another, preserve unrelated user changes, run proportionate checks, and return changed files, verification evidence, and any residual risk.

The lead agent owns integration. Inspect the resulting diff and verification output, fix integration defects, and report the final outcome.

The user's selection authorizes Phase 3; the Codex-plugin guidance to stop after presenting review findings covers code-review handoffs, not this step.

Fallbacks

  • If subagents are unavailable, state that the independent-context path is unavailable and run the local workflow.
  • If the brainstorm subagent fails or returns empty output, retry once with a shorter brief, then fall back locally.
  • If the selected approaches cannot be combined without changing the requested behavior, explain the incompatibility before proposing a hybrid.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

advisor

無料

Consults Fable as an independent, read-only reviewer at an effort the caller matches to the question. The calling session (usually Opus, or Haiku) holds the task and escalates one decision point. Use before committing to an interpretation or a substantial piece of writing or analysis, when stuck or not converging, when changing approach, or as a final check on a finished task. Fallback for when the native advisor tool is unavailable. Not for a session already running Fable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

scdenney/open-science-skills652026年10月8日 更新

advisor

無料

Consult an independent, read-only GPT-6 Astra advisor before committing to a substantive interpretation, approach, or final result. Not for routine work, implementation, or file edits. Uses gpt-6-astra at an effort matched to the question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

scdenney/open-science-skills652026年10月8日 更新

beamer

無料

House rules and craft for LaTeX Beamer decks (storyboarding, slide prose, frame budgets, layout, XeLaTeX and Korean fonts, color, figures, Overleaf hygiene, build QA). Use to write, edit, review, or build a Beamer deck.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

scdenney/open-science-skills652026年10月8日 更新

beamer

無料

House rules and craft for LaTeX Beamer slide decks (lectures, seminars, talks), drawn from the author's own Overleaf edits and published slide-design guidance. Covers storyboarding, frame titles, slide prose, word and frame budgets, layout without overfull boxes, XeLaTeX fonts and Korean (xeCJK), color, figures and screenshots, Overleaf source hygiene, speaker notes, and a build-and-QA loop with a contact sheet. Use when writing, editing, reviewing, or building a Beamer deck, theme, or storyboard. A course skill supplies course facts and the frame skeleton; this skill supplies the craft. Not for HTML or PowerPoint decks, posters, or papers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

scdenney/open-science-skills652026年10月8日 更新

Audits a manuscript's citations for fabricated or nonexistent sources, DOIs that resolve to a different work, mismatches between in-text citations and the reference list, APA 7 or journal style, and whether each source supports the claim it is attached to. Checks entries against Crossref, OpenAlex, and DataCite and labels anything it could not verify NOT CHECKED. Use to check citations, references, a .bib file, or DOIs, or when a source may be AI-invented. Figures and tables go to figure-table-audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

scdenney/open-science-skills652026年10月8日 更新

Audit a manuscript's citations for fabricated sources, DOIs that resolve to the wrong work, in-text and reference-list mismatches, style, and claim support, verified against Crossref and OpenAlex. Use to check citations, references, a .bib file, or DOIs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

scdenney/open-science-skills652026年10月8日 更新

scdenney のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する