Step-by-step tutorial for adding a new lightweight JIT CUDA kernel to sglang.kernels JIT infrastructure and public operator groups
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Add or verify a model's chat prompt rendering and tokenization in rust/sglang-processor so it matches SGLang's Python serving path exactly (same prompt text, same token ids). Use when adding a model to sglang-processor, porting a model's rendering from sgl-router, bumping Dynamo's renderer, or debugging a processor-vs-Python prompt mismatch.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
rust/sglang-processor renders chat requests for SGLang's Rust hosts (the Rust
server, sgl-router, the renderer). A model is supported only when, for the same
request body, the processor produces the same prompt text and the same prompt
token ids as Python's OpenAIServingChat. Python is the reference, Dynamo is
the implementation, and SGLang code exists only where the two differ.
Scope: the request -> prompt -> token ids path, plus the checks that let hosts
serve the model's OpenAI requests through /generate (see "OpenAI layer").
Multimodal preprocessing is not covered here.
The worked example is DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731: src/render/models/deepseek_v4.rs
plus tests/fixtures/parity/deepseek-v4-flash-0731.json. Paths below are relative
to rust/sglang-processor/ unless they start with python/.
| Piece | File | Needed when |
|---|---|---|
| Identity -> formatter | src/render/selection.rs (select_chat_formatter) | always; mirror the order of chat_encoding.resolve_chat_encoding_spec |
| Formatter variant | src/render/mod.rs (ChatFormatter, its render_request arm, plus the render_prompt, stop_strs and resolve_thinking arms) | always |
| SGLang-specific steps | src/render/models/<model>.rs, re-exported in models/mod.rs | only where Dynamo diverges from Python |
| Parity cases | tests/fixtures/parity/<model-id>.json | always |
| README row | the render table in README.md | always |
No new test code: tests/parity.rs checks every fixture in the directory.
render_request(Value, ..) takes the SGLang request body, not Dynamo's
OAIChatLikeRequest, because Python reads fields the trait lacks (task,
continue_final_message, the reasoning object). Pick the shape by how Python
renders the model:
None spec such as dsv4 or dsv32):
give the model a dedicated ChatFormatter variant and render_request arm, like
DeepSeek-V4. If selection.rs already wires the model to a Dynamo
PromptFormatter, replace that branch.apply_chat_template (Jinja, spec None): the first such model
adds one generic arm that adapts the body into OAIChatLikeRequest, in its own
PR. sgl-router's ChatRequest in
experimental/sgl-router/src/tokenizer/chat_formatter.rs is a working adapter.Pick the checkpoint. Use the one the model's cookbook page recommends
(docs/cookbook/), pin its Hugging Face commit as revision, and cache it.
Note whether its tokenizer ships a chat_template; that can change the spec.
Trace the Python path for the model. Write down every transformation
between the HTTP body and prompt_ids, in order:
protocol.py::ChatCompletionRequest.normalize_reasoning_inputs: reasoning
and reasoning_effort set the default thinking / enable_thinking.
Reuse render/reasoning.rs for this rather than porting it again.serving_chat._convert_to_internal_request: chat_template_kwargs.reasoning_effort
replaces the request effort; server --default-chat-template-kwargs merge in.chat_encoding.resolve_chat_encoding_spec: which branch renders the model
(a spec such as dsv4, dsv32, kimi_k3, inkling, or None for Jinja).
It also reads the server's --tool-call-parser and whether the tokenizer has
a chat template. If the deployment depends on the parser, set
tool_call_parser in the fixture, and add it to ChatFormatterOptions in the
same PR. Note any per-checkpoint state the server resolves once (DeepSeek-V4's
effort profile reads encoding/encoding_dsv4.py).serving_chat._apply_jinja_template / _encode_messages:
message dumping, content flattening, _handle_last_assistant_message, system
insertion, tools, model-specific fields, the encoder or apply_chat_template
call, and how the prompt is tokenized.encoding_dsv4.py), line by line. History
rules live there: dropped turns, </think> on empty reasoning, argument
formatting, and the errors it raises.This list is the divergence inventory.
Find Dynamo's counterpart. Check dynamo_renderer::native_formatter_for,
the model's low-level encoder (for example deepseek::v4::encode_messages_with_options),
or the Jinja template. Prefer the lowest-level Dynamo entry that lets SGLang own
request semantics. Dynamo's OpenAI-level formatters apply their own defaults
(they filter tools by tool_choice, inject response_format, and map effort),
which often differ from SGLang's. Diff the low-level encoder against Python's
for the rules in step 1.
Write one request case per inventory item in the fixture (name +
request only), then generate the expected outputs from Python (below). Cover
the checklist; reuse the request shapes from the DeepSeek-V4 fixture where they apply.
Implement. Start from a plain Dynamo call and run tests/parity.rs. For
each failing case, add the smallest SGLang step that fixes it, with a one-line
doc comment naming the Python source it mirrors. Never patch the fixture to
match Rust.
Verify text offline, then token ids with the checkpoint cached (commands below). If sgl-router or the renderer uses the formatter, run their suites too.
user
reduced to role and content; null content becomes "". (ignored_fields, tool_results)parts)tool_choice allows; field order
and defaults of Function.model_dump; message-level tools; empty lists.
(tools, tools_none, tools_named, message_tools, empty_message_tools)strict: 1 and defer_loading: "false" become booleans, and
strict: null is rejected. Probe the pydantic model in Python to get its exact
rules; don't guess them. (tool_bool_coercion, tool_strict_null, continuation_coerced)serde_json preserve_order is declared in Cargo.toml). Floats must print as
Python's json.dumps prints them (1e-06, 1e+16, 100.0).
(tool_results, agentic_thinking, tool_float_values, history_float_arguments)thinking > request effort (!= "none") > reasoning.enabled
server default kwargs >
SGLANG_DEFAULT_THINKING.enabledfollows Python truthiness (1is on); strings use Python's yes-word set. (thinking_false,thinking_none,drop_thinking_ignored,reasoning_enabled_numeric,reasoning_enable_string)
reasoning, reasoning_effort and env;
the checkpoint's profile mapping. (effort_high, effort_max, kwargs_effort, effort_conflict, reasoning_object)continue_final_message
a separately tokenized prefix. Check whether content is flattened before the
split (it is for DeepSeek-V4). Run each check where Python runs it: a final
assistant turn's tool calls are discarded, so object checks on their arguments
belong after the split. Hosts reach the model through render_prompt too, so
check the renderer's continuation handling (sglang-renderer render()) as well.
(final_assistant, continuation_parts, continuation_bos, continuation_only, final_tool_call_no_arguments, continuation_tool_call_null_arguments)task placement, a system turn mid-conversation,
inserted empty system turns. (task_action, task_after_developer, consecutive_task, mid_system)multi_turn, thinking_multi_turn)tokenizer.encode adds special tokens by default; the
continuation prefix is encoded alone and loses a leading BOS
(_append_assistant_prefix_to_prompt_ids). tests/parity.rs does both, using the
fixture's bos_token_id; render_prompt returns the prefix as its own segment so
hosts keep that boundary. (continuation_bos, continuation_after_text)error, and tests/parity.rs then requires render_request to fail. That
includes pydantic rejections and Python crashes (a 500 is still a rejection).
(invalid_tool_arguments, continuation_only) If Dynamo rejects a shape Python accepts, say in the
PR that hosts fall back to the engine for it.known_gap with the reason. The test
reports the case without failing, and fails once it matches so the marker gets
removed. (tool_float_values: Dynamo's deepseek::common::to_json)tests/scripts/generate_parity.py loads the pinned snapshot and resolves the
spec and per-checkpoint state with SGLang's own resolvers. It then renders every
case through the real OpenAIServingChat._apply_jinja_template and writes:
prompt, token_count and token_sha256 for each case, or error when
Python raises (name, request and known_gap are kept as written). An
AttributeError aborts instead: the stub server lacks something, so extend it;config (the config.json fields the processor reads, plus
resolved overrides such as the effort profile) and bos_token_id.cd rust/sglang-processor
PYTHONPATH=$REPO/python HF_HUB_CACHE=<hub cache> HF_HUB_OFFLINE=1 \
python tests/scripts/generate_parity.py tests/fixtures/parity/<model-id>.json
When a new spec needs more, extend serving_chat() in the script (one place):
__init__ resolves, for
example _dsv41_default_reasoning_effort.apply_chat_template(tokenize=True): the recorder sees no
text. Record the template's text output instead.Pin revision to a commit hash and regenerate only on purpose.
cd rust
cargo test -p sglang-processor --locked # text, offline
HF_HUB_CACHE=<hub cache> cargo test -p sglang-processor --test parity --locked # + token ids
cargo clippy -p sglang-processor --all-targets --locked -- -D warnings
cargo check -p sglang-processor --no-default-features --features render,tokenizer --locked
The token check loads the pinned commit's snapshot from the cache. When the
snapshot is missing, the test prints token ids not checked (visible with
-- --nocapture), so confirm that line is absent before claiming token parity.
With the snapshot cached, the test also checks that the checkpoint resolves the
fixture's recorded DeepSeek-V4 profile.
A host serves a model's OpenAI requests through /generate (src/openai/) only
once its render parity holds. Two more fixtures then cover the rest of Python's
OpenAI layer:
tests/fixtures/reasoning_parity/<parser>.json, from
tests/scripts/generate_reasoning_parity.py: SGLang's ReasoningParser on
chunked outputs. A parser is served once src/think/models/ ports it.tests/fixtures/tool_parity/<parser>.json, from
tests/scripts/generate_tool_parity.py: SGLang's FunctionCallParser on
chunked outputs, replayed by the test in src/tool_call/models/mod.rs. A tool
parser is served once src/tool_call/models/ ports it.tests/fixtures/openai_parity/<model-id>.json, from
tests/scripts/generate_openai_parity.py --model <dir> --engine-url <engine>:
the /generate body OpenAIServingChat builds for each case, a live engine's
output for it, and the response Python builds from that output. Launch the
engine with the model's cookbook flags, including its parsers.dynamo-renderer or dynamo-tokenizers.SGLANG_DEFAULT_THINKING, SGLANG_DSV4_REASONING_EFFORT,
SGLANG_DSV41_REASONING_EFFORT) are read per request, as in Python. The
generator pins them and tests/parity.rs clears them, so fixtures do not
depend on the machine.OAIChatLikeRequest path) cannot carry every field,
such as task and message-level tools. Parity is defined on render_request;
report host-adapter gaps separately rather than bending the model code.render/mod.rs
beyond the dispatch arm.まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Step-by-step tutorial for adding a new lightweight JIT CUDA kernel to sglang.kernels JIT infrastructure and public operator groups
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Step-by-step tutorial for adding a heavyweight AOT CUDA/C++ kernel to sgl-kernel (including tests & benchmarks)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Start and persistently pursue a goal to babysit an SGLang pull request until selected GitHub Actions workflows pass on the latest PR head. Use when asked to monitor, babysit, retry, or fix PR CI for lint.yml, pr-test.yml, pr-test-extra.yml, AMD, or other named workflows; classify failures as PR-related versus flaky or infrastructural, auto-fix and push only small clean fixes, rerun failed jobs only up to 10 times, and ignore unselected workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit the existing test tree and CI configuration for improvements, using a catalog of patterns previously applied in this repo. Use when asked to audit tests or CI, shrink CI time or cost, find redundant or misplaced tests, clean up a test group, or review whether a CI change follows established practice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide to SGLang CI workflow orchestration — stage ordering, fail-fast, gating, partitioning, execution modes, and debugging CI failures. Use when modifying CI workflows, adding stages, debugging CI pipeline issues, or understanding how tests are dispatched and gated across stages.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit SGLang startup logs, save evidence, and propose cleanup for user review. With no arguments, run Qwen3-8B at TP1 and TP2 plus gpt-oss-20b at TP1.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。