本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

bpmn-generator

Enterprise BPMN 2.0 diagram generator — converts natural language process descriptions into OMG-compliant BPMN 2.0 XML files and SVG previews via a 4-phase pipeline: Intent Extraction (LLM → JSON Logic-Core) → Validation (deadlock detection, structural soundness) → ElkJS Auto-Layout → BPMN XML + SVG output. Supports: multi-pool collaborations, message flows, boundary events (timer/error/signal), loop/multi-instance markers, data objects, all gateway types with correct gatewayDirection, and all BPMN 2.0 task types. Use this skill whenever the user wants to create, generate, or model a BPMN diagram, process flow, or workflow — even if they say "draw a process", "model this workflow", "make a BPMN for...", "create a Prozessmodell", "visualize this process", or describe a business process in natural language. Also use for editing or extending existing BPMN Logic-Core JSON.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(13)

  • SKILL.md23.3 KB
  • .gitignore1.6 KB
  • AGENTS.md1.1 KB
  • CHANGELOG.md85.9 KB
  • CLAUDE.md53.4 KB
  • COMPATIBILITY.md2.7 KB
  • CONTRIBUTING.md3.4 KB
  • EVALUATION.md8.8 KB
  • LICENSE1.0 KB
  • README.md23.9 KB
  • ROADMAP.md17.0 KB
  • SECURITY.md9.0 KB
  • THIRD-PARTY-NOTICES.md3.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

BPMN Generator Skill v2.0 — Enterprise Edition

Converts natural language process descriptions into OMG BPMN 2.0.2 compliant XML files and SVG previews via a 4-phase pipeline. All visual rendering follows the bpmn-js reference implementation.

Pipeline Overview

User Text
   ↓  [Phase 1] Intent Extraction  (Claude LLM)
JSON Logic-Core
   ↓  [Phase 2] Validation          (rules + deadlock detection + structural soundness)
Validated JSON
   ↓  [Phase 3] Auto-Layout         (ElkJS Sugiyama layered algorithm)
JSON + Coordinates (edge endpoints clipped to shape boundaries)
   ↓  [Phase 4] Serialization       (pipeline.js)
BPMN 2.0 XML + SVG

The LLM never handles coordinates. Layout is 100% algorithmic.


Modes: Document (IST) vs. Optimize (Soll)

Two distinct intents — keep them separate:

  • Document mode (default, IST / as-is): the user describes a process and wants it captured faithfully as BPMN. No judgment, no improvement suggestions. This is the default for every entry point (CLI, runPipeline, HTTP, MCP).
  • Optimize mode (Soll / to-be): the user wants a better process. Enables the opt-in Optimization Advisory layer, which flags graph-detectable redesign opportunities (Reijers 2005 heuristics + BABOK Lean metrics) as non-blocking advisories — never auto-applied.

Select the mode consistently across entry points:

  • CLI: node bpmn/pipeline.js in.json out --optimize
  • Programmatic: runPipeline(lc, { mode: 'optimize' })
  • HTTP: { "logicCore": {...}, "mode": "optimize" } on /api/v1/generate|validate|orchestrate
  • MCP: mode: "optimize" on generate_bpmn / validate_bpmn / orchestrate_bpmn

Advisories are review suggestions with trade-off tags (time/cost/quality/flexibility); they are heuristics, not proofs — present them as options, never silently apply them. Each advisory is an object { id, transform, targets, message, tradeoff, ref, judgment } (see references/api-reference.md); message is the human-readable line, transform names the matching intervention in the toolbox below.

Redesign Toolbox

In optimize mode, an advisory's transform field names a concrete, mechanical intervention. The interventions live in scripts/bpmn/redesign.js; each has a preview* function (what would be feasible, and why not) and an apply* function that performs it:

  • parallelize — puts a linear, same-lane task chain into a parallel-gateway split/join. Tasks only: a chain containing a subprocess, a call activity, an intermediate event or a gateway is refused, because parallelising a scope or a branch changes the process logic rather than the order of its steps. This is also why O04 never nominates a subprocess chain — the detector (optimize.js) is scoped to the same leaf-task set as the transform, so it cannot advise something the toolbox is guaranteed to refuse. If you want such a chain parallelised, that starts with a decision about the transform, not with the advisory
  • mergeTasks — folds a linear task chain into one task; requires an explicit name — naming the result is a judgment call the toolbox refuses to make for you
  • relane — moves one node to a different lane
  • reorderKnockouts — reorders a chain of exclusive-gateway "knock-out" checks; requires an explicit order — it is never computed
  • isolateException — turns an inline exception branch into a boundary event on the owning task; requires explicit marker and cancelActivity, and, when the exception end has more than one incoming edge, an explicit edgeIds naming which ones belong to this task — it refuses rather than guess

No-language-model guarantee: the toolbox is purely deterministic. scripts/bpmn/redesign-core.js may not import agents/llm-provider.js, directly or transitively — no LLM call, no API key. Verify with grep -rn "^import.*llm-provider" scripts/redesign*.js (no hit; a plain grep -rn "llm-provider" also matches the comment stating this rule, so it is not a useful check on its own).

Rollback: every apply* re-checks its result against a fixed, profile-independent soundness gate (soundness + workflow-net layers, always on — scripts/bpmn/redesign-core.js: SOUNDNESS_GATE) and rolls back (throws, writes nothing) on structural errors. Style warnings never block; they come back in the result's warnings array instead.

What it will not decide for you: the toolbox never decides whether an intervention should happen — that's the caller's call. Where a transform lacks the information to act safely (no proven data-independence between two tasks, no supplied ordering, no supplied marker/cancelActivity, an ambiguous set of incoming edges) it refuses with a specific reason instead of guessing. Not every transform currently has a matching automatic advisory either: O01→isolateException, O02→reorderKnockouts, O03→relane, O04→parallelize are detected by optimize.js; mergeTasks has no detector and is reachable only by direct/manual invocation.

Protection lists (policy.protectNodes / policy.protectLanes) match a node or lane by id and by display name, and resolve lane membership whether the model expresses it via node.lane or via Lane.nodeIds. Transforms also maintain both representations: a transform that deletes a node removes it from any Lane.nodeIds, and one that creates a node adds it — so the two never contradict each other. Purely Format-A models are left untouched (no nodeIds arrays are introduced).

Every apply* returns a change record with three arrays — added, removed, modified — that together name every element (node, edge, or lane) that differs between input and result.

CLI (preview is the default; nothing is written without --apply; a refusal exits non-zero and writes nothing):

node bpmn/redesign-cli.js <input.json> <parallelize|mergeTasks|relane|reorderKnockouts|isolateException> \
  [--nodes a,b,c] [--name "..."] [--lane X] [--order g2,g1] [--end xend] [--attach-to task] \
  [--marker timer] [--cancel-activity true|false] [--edges j2,j5] [--policy '{"protectNodes":[...]}'] \
  [--apply] [-o out.json]

Reference Files

Read these when needed:

  • references/logic-core-schema.md — Full JSON schema, type table, all examples → read before extracting JSON
  • references/prompt-template.md — LLM prompt templates for extraction, review, amendment → read before prompting

Supported BPMN 2.0 Elements

Events

TypeMarkersNotes
Start EventNone, Message, Timer, Signal, Conditional, Error, Escalation, CompensationThin circle (strokeWidth 2)
End EventNone, Message, Signal, Error, Escalation, Compensation, Cancel, Terminate, MultipleThick circle (strokeWidth 4)
Intermediate CatchMessage, Timer, Signal, Conditional, Link, Error, Escalation, Compensation, CancelDouble circle
Intermediate ThrowMessage, Signal, Link, Escalation, CompensationDouble circle, filled marker
Boundary EventTimer, Error, Message, Signal, Escalation, Compensation, Cancel, ConditionalAttached to activity, interrupting/non-interrupting

Activities

TypeIconNotes
Task—Generic activity
User Task👤Human work item
Service Task⚙⚙System/API call
Script Task📄Script execution
Send Task✉ (filled)Outgoing message
Receive Task✉ (outlined)Incoming message
Manual Task✋Physical work
Business Rule Task📊DMN / rule engine
Sub-Process[+]Collapsed, with expand marker
Call Activitythick borderReusable called process

Activity Markers (bottom-center)

MarkerPropertyVisual
Standard LooploopType: "standard"↻ circular arrow
MI ParallelmultiInstance: "parallel"⫴ three vertical bars
MI SequentialmultiInstance: "sequential"≡ three horizontal bars
Ad-HocisAdHoc: true~ tilde
CompensationisCompensation: true◁◁ double rewind

Gateways

TypeMarkerDirection
Exclusive (XOR)✕Diverging/Converging/Mixed
Parallel (AND)+Diverging/Converging/Mixed
Inclusive (OR)○Diverging/Converging/Mixed
Event-Based○+⬠Diverging
Complex✱Mixed

Data & Artifacts

TypeVisual
Data ObjectRectangle with folded corner
Data StoreCylinder
Text AnnotationOpen bracket [ with text
GroupDashed rounded rectangle

Connections

TypeStyleSource markerTarget marker
Sequence FlowSolid—Filled triangle
Default FlowSolidDiagonal slashFilled triangle
Conditional FlowSolidOpen diamondFilled triangle
Message FlowDashed (10,12)Open circleOpen triangle
AssociationDotted (0.5,5)—Open chevron (if directed)

When to use which mode

ContextMode
User gives a process description in textFull pipeline (all 4 phases)
User uploads/provides existing Logic-Core JSONSkip Phase 1, start at Phase 2
User wants to add/change something in existing diagramAmendment flow
User describes multiple organizations interactingMulti-pool mode
User is in Claude Code with Node.jsUse scripts/bpmn/pipeline.js
User is in Claude.ai (no script execution)Inline mode: generate XML + SVG as artifacts

Phase 1 — Intent Extraction

Read references/logic-core-schema.md and references/prompt-template.md first.

Use the Master Extraction Prompt template. Key rules to enforce:

Naming Conventions (BA-Quality)

  • Tasks: Objekt + Verb (Infinitiv) — "Antrag prüfen" ✓ / "Prüfung" ✗
  • XOR Gateways: Question form — "Antrag gültig?" ✓ / "Entscheidung" ✗
  • AND/OR Gateways: Empty or brief label — "" ✓ (these are sync points)
  • Gateway edges: Always labeled — "Ja"/"Nein", "genehmigt"/"abgelehnt"
  • Lanes: Functional roles — "Sachbearbeiter" ✓ / "Max Müller" ✗
  • Events: Noun phrase — "Antrag eingegangen" ✓

Granularity Rules

  • Max 7–10 nodes per level. Use subProcess for groups with >3 logical steps.
  • Never create "God-Tasks" (a single task hiding a whole sub-process).
  • Prefer more granular over too abstract.

Happy Path

  • Mark the main success flow edges with "isHappyPath": true
  • ElkJS will lay these out on the horizontal axis (left→right)
  • Exception/error paths branch vertically

Gateway Direction (OMG spec §10.5.1)

  • has_join: true → pipeline sets gatewayDirection="Converging" in XML
  • Split gateways get gatewayDirection="Diverging" automatically
  • Mixed (split+join) gateways get gatewayDirection="Mixed"

Event Markers

  • Set marker explicitly when the event type is clear from context
  • If not set, pipeline infers from event name (e.g. "Frist abgelaufen" → timer)

Phase 2 — Validation

The pipeline validates automatically. These checks run:

Errors (block pipeline):

  • At least one startEvent exists per process
  • At least one endEvent exists per process
  • All edge.source and edge.target reference existing node IDs
  • No XOR-split path merging at an AND-join (deadlock detection)
  • Message flows reference valid node/pool IDs

Warnings (report but continue):

  • XOR gateways not named as questions
  • Tasks not following Objekt + Verb (Infinitiv) pattern (M01)
  • Nodes with no edges (isolated)
  • XOR gateway outgoing edges without labels
  • Nodes with no outgoing flow (may not terminate)

Use the Reviewer Agent Prompt from references/prompt-template.md for additional automated review.

Pre-Delivery Gate (MANDATORY — do not skip)

A first draft is expected to be wrong. Never present a diagram as finished until it passes this gate. Warnings are not noise — they are the alarm.

  1. Read references/logic-core-schema.md first. It is the field-by-field contract (every node type, marker, edge, message flow, black-box pool). Fill the input file against it — do not guess field names or values.
  2. Validate the draft against the schema and run it strictly:
    node bpmn/pipeline.js <input>.json <output> --strict
    
    • The schema-gate (references/input-schema.json) rejects malformed structure with a precise field path and exits non-zero — fix every reported field.
    • --strict makes every warning fatal (exit non-zero, no files written), across three independent checks: rule-engine warnings, diagram (DI) integrity, and BPMN serialisation (the round trip of the generated XML through bpmn-moddle — this is what catches an invalid element, e.g. an annotation carrying an illegal attribute).
  3. Resolve every warning and re-run until --strict exits 0. Delivering a diagram with unresolved warnings is not allowed.
  4. Only then present the output. If a warning is a deliberate, justified exception, say so explicitly to the user — do not silently ship past it.

Phase 3 + 4 — Script Execution (Claude Code)

Setup (first time only)

cd scripts/
npm install   # installs runtime + dev dependencies (see package.json)

Run pipeline

# From JSON file:
node bpmn/pipeline.js my-process.json my-process

# From stdin (inline JSON):
echo '{ ... }' | node bpmn/pipeline.js - output

# Outputs:
#   output.bpmn  — BPMN 2.0 XML with full DI coordinates
#   output.svg   — SVG preview (open in browser)

OMG Compliance Guarantees

The generated BPMN 2.0 XML ensures:

  • Single <laneSet> per process (spec §10.5)
  • Correct gatewayDirection attribute (Diverging/Converging/Mixed)
  • conditionExpression as child element, not attribute (spec §10.3.1)
  • <incoming> and <outgoing> references on all flow nodes
  • Event definition child elements (messageEventDefinition, timerEventDefinition, etc.)
  • Loop/multi-instance characteristics as child elements
  • Boundary events with attachedToRef and cancelActivity
  • Valid isHorizontal="true" on pool/lane shapes
  • Edge endpoints clipped to actual shape boundaries

Inline Mode (Claude.ai — no script execution)

When Claude Code is not available, generate outputs directly in the conversation:

  1. Extract the Logic-Core JSON (show to user for confirmation)
  2. Apply validation rules mentally (check for deadlocks, naming, completeness)
  3. For the SVG: render as an HTML artifact using inline SVG
    • Use the exact OMG dimensions: 36px events, 100×80 tasks, 50×50 gateways
    • Use ElkJS-compatible manual positioning: elements spaced 60px between layers, 40px between nodes
    • Apply stroke widths: 2 (start), 4 (end), 1.5 (intermediate), 2 (task), 5 (call activity)
  4. For the BPMN XML: generate as a code artifact following all OMG compliance rules

Show the Logic-Core JSON to the user before generating final files.

Note: Inline mode coordinates are manually estimated. For production-quality layout, use Claude Code with the pipeline script.


Amendment Flow (editing existing diagrams)

When user wants to modify an existing diagram:

  1. Load the existing Logic-Core JSON
  2. Use the Amendment Prompt from references/prompt-template.md
  3. Apply only the atomic changes requested
  4. Re-validate (Phase 2)
  5. Re-run pipeline (Phase 3+4)

Never regenerate the entire Logic-Core from scratch for small edits — preserve all existing IDs.


Two-Agent Pattern (production quality)

For enterprise output, run Modeler + Reviewer in loop:

Modeler (Claude):  Text → Logic-Core JSON (draft)
     ↓
Reviewer (Claude): Logic-Core → Issues JSON
     ↓
  No issues? → Run pipeline
  Issues?    → Modeler applies fixes → repeat (max 3 iterations)

Use prompts from references/prompt-template.md for both roles.


Output Artifacts

FilePurposeOpens in
*.bpmnBPMN 2.0 XML with DICamunda Modeler, bpmn.io, ADONIS, Signavio
*.svgVector previewBrowser, Confluence, Word/PowerPoint
*_logic.jsonLogic-Core (save for amendments)Text editor, version control

Error Handling

ErrorCauseFix
Missing startEventNo start node in JSONAdd startEvent node
Missing endEventNo end node in JSONAdd endEvent node
Unknown source/targetEdge references non-existent nodeFix ID typo
Deadlock: XOR-split feeds AND-joinStructural errorChange AND-join to XOR-join or restructure
ELK layout failedDisconnected graphFix isolated nodes
npm install failsNo network or Node.js missingEnsure Node.js ≥20

Quick-Reference: Node Types

TypeIconUse for
startEvent○Process trigger
endEvent⬤Process end
intermediateCatchEvent◎Wait for event mid-flow
intermediateThrowEvent◎●Send event mid-flow
boundaryEvent◎→Timer/error on task
userTask👤Human work item
serviceTask⚙System/API call
scriptTask📄Script execution
sendTask✉●Send message
receiveTask✉○Receive message
businessRuleTask📊DMN / rules
manualTask✋Physical work
subProcess[+]Collapsed complexity
callActivity▬▬Reusable process
exclusiveGateway◇✕One path (XOR)
parallelGateway◇+All paths (AND)
inclusiveGateway◇○One or more (OR)
eventBasedGateway◇◎First event wins
complexGateway◇✱Custom logic
dataObjectReference📋Document/data
dataStoreReference🗄Database
textAnnotation[Explanatory note

Round-Tripping (BPMN Import)

Import existing BPMN 2.0 XML files to extract a Logic-Core JSON for editing.

Claude Code

cd scripts/
node bpmn/import.js existing-diagram.bpmn extracted.json

Workflow

Existing .bpmn file
   ↓  [import.js] Parse XML → extract nodes, edges, lanes, message flows
Logic-Core JSON
   ↓  [User/LLM edits]  Amendment flow
Modified Logic-Core
   ↓  [pipeline.js]  Layout + render
New .bpmn + .svg

Supported on import: Processes, collaborations, lanes, message flows, collapsed pools, gateways (with direction), all task/event types, boundary events, loop/MI markers, data objects, associations, process documentation, default flows.


Inline Mode (Claude.ai — with ElkJS)

When Claude Code is not available, use the inline template from references/inline-template.md to create a self-contained HTML artifact:

  1. Extract the Logic-Core JSON
  2. Show to user for confirmation
  3. Create an HTML artifact with the template
  4. Replace __LOGIC_CORE_JSON__ with the actual JSON

The template runs ElkJS from CDN in the browser — no manual coordinate estimation. It produces orthogonal layouts with proper BPMN shapes.

Note: The inline renderer is simplified (no task type icons, no event markers). For full rendering fidelity, use Claude Code with pipeline.js.


Collapsed Pools (Black-Box Participants)

Best Practice (Bruce Silver Method & Style): A diagram should have one expanded pool (your process in scope) and collapsed pools for external participants (customers, suppliers, authorities).

Schema

{
  "collapsedPools": [
    { "id": "Pool_Kunde", "name": "Versicherungsnehmer" },
    { "id": "Pool_Gutachter", "name": "Externer Gutachter" }
  ]
}

Rendering

  • SVG: Thin horizontal band (600×60) with centered label
  • XML: <participant> without processRef (OMG spec §9.3)
  • Message flows target the collapsed pool ID directly

Associations (Data Objects + Annotations)

Connect Data Objects, Data Stores, and Text Annotations to flow nodes:

{
  "associations": [
    { "id": "assoc1", "source": "task_erfassen", "target": "do_akte", "directed": true },
    { "id": "assoc2", "source": "ann_hinweis", "target": "task_pruefen" }
  ]
}
  • SVG: Dotted line (strokeDasharray 0.5,5)
  • XML: <association> element with associationDirection, placed in <artifacts> alongside any TextAnnotation/Group it connects to — never in <flowElements> (§10.7). Endpoint resolution has to look in both collections: an association's source or target is very often an artifact, not a flow node.

OMG Compliance Checklist (v3)

FeatureStatusOMG Reference
Single <laneSet> per process✅§10.5
gatewayDirection Diverging/Converging/Mixed✅§10.5.1
default attribute on XOR gateways✅§10.5.1
conditionExpression as child element✅§10.3.1
<incoming>/<outgoing> on flow nodes✅§10.2.1
Top-level <message>/<signal>/<error> definitions✅§8.4, §9
Event definitions with messageRef/errorRef✅§10.4
<documentation> on process and nodes✅§8.3.1
<association> elements✅§7.2
Artifacts (TextAnnotation, Group, Association) in <artifacts>, never <flowElements>✅§10.7
TextAnnotation content as a <text> child element, never a name attribute✅§10.7.3
Group label via categoryValueRef → a Category/CategoryValue root element, never a name attribute✅§10.7.2
Collapsed pool (<participant> without processRef)✅§9.3
DI Label Bounds with <dc:Bounds>✅§12.1
Loop/MI characteristics as child elements✅§10.2.2
Boundary events with attachedToRef✅§10.4.4
Orthogonal edge routing✅Visual convention
Edge endpoint clipping to shape boundaries✅Visual convention
Pool width equalization✅Visual convention
Deadlock detection (XOR→AND)✅Structural soundness
Round-tripping (BPMN→JSON→BPMN)✅Interoperability

Why the three artifact rules above matter if you ever hand-write XML (inline mode): an Artifact (TextAnnotation, Group, Association) extends BaseElement, which declares only id — name is introduced further down by FlowElement, and Artifacts never inherit from it. Most XML libraries write the attribute anyway without complaint, so a name on a TextAnnotation produces no error and an empty box in every real BPMN tool. This shipped once; see references/omg-compliance.md §10.7 for the full mapping.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Use this skill whenever the user wants to create or improve a presentation for an academic context — conference papers, seminar talks, thesis defenses, grant briefings, lab meetings, invited lectures, or any presentation where the audience will evaluate reasoning and evidence. Triggers include: 'conference talk', 'seminar slides', 'thesis defense', 'research presentation', 'academic deck', 'academic presentation'. Also triggers when the user asks to 'make slides' in combination with academic content (e.g., 'make slides for my paper on X', 'create a presentation for my dissertation defense', 'build a deck for my grant proposal'). This skill governs CONTENT and STRUCTURE decisions. For the technical work of creating or editing the .pptx file itself, also read the pptx SKILL.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

skillmds/skillmd712026年10月9日 更新

adp

無料

Redpanda's Agentic Data Plane: governance infrastructure for building, running, and governing AI agents and MCP servers, plus a proxying AI Gateway for LLM providers, operated via `rpk ai` and the ADP API. Use when creating or managing AI agents (managed or self-managed) via `rpk ai agent` or `AgentRegistryService`; configuring MCP servers (remote or managed catalog, code mode, auth); setting up LLM providers or querying models via `rpk ai llm`/`rpk ai model` or the AI Gateway proxy; or configuring budgets, guardrails, or Cedar access-control policies through the governance APIs. Also covers reading agent transcripts and spending insights, and wiring OAuth clients or providers to the aigw Authorization Server. For the separate rpk cloud mcp control-plane MCP server, see `/redpanda:rpk-cloud`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

skillmds/skillmd712026年10月9日 更新

ads

無料

Operate professional paid advertising across Google, Meta, YouTube, LinkedIn, TikTok, Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, Reddit, Pinterest, Snapchat, and X. Use for account intake, source-grounded audits, strategy, budget and measurement planning, creative production, experiments, reporting, monitoring, and explicitly approved campaign changes. Also trigger on PPC, paid social, retail media, attribution, tracking, landing pages, cross-platform conversion totals, negative keywords or search terms, beta-feature scoring, stale platform claims, API-token or credential setup, campaign deletion, and safe Claude Ads installation or uninstall.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

skillmds/skillmd712026年10月9日 更新

ads-apple

無料

Audit Apple Ads measurement, AdServices and AdAttributionKit, campaign and keyword structure, Search Match, App Store placements, custom product pages, bidding, budgets, MMP reconciliation, and policy. Use for Apple Ads, Apple Search Ads, App Store ads, Search Match, custom product pages, AdServices, or Apple app-install campaigns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

skillmds/skillmd712026年10月9日 更新

Research competitor paid-ad presence, messaging, creative, formats, landing pages, keyword and auction signals, transparent ad libraries, and strategic gaps across supported platforms. Use for competitor ads, ad libraries, ad spy, competitive PPC analysis, competitor creative, Google Ads Transparency, Meta Ad Library, or paid-media competitor research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

skillmds/skillmd712026年10月9日 更新

ads-dna

無料

Extract a public-safe brand and offer profile for paid advertising from an authorized website and operator input. Triggers on: brand DNA, brand profile, brand identity, brand style, brand colors, brand voice, visual identity, style guide, website brand analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

skillmds/skillmd712026年10月9日 更新

skillmds のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する