本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

principle-encode-lessons-in-structure

Apply when you catch yourself writing the same instruction a second time, or notice a recurring correction. Encode the rule as a lint, metadata flag, runtime check, or script instead of more text.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md2.2 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Encode Lessons in Structure

Encode recurring fixes in mechanisms (tools, code, metadata, automation) instead of textual instructions. Every error, human correction, and unexpected outcome is a learning signal. Capture it, route it, and close the loop.

Why: Textual instructions are easy to miss. They require the reader to notice, remember, and comply. Structural mechanisms (lint rules, metadata flags, runtime checks, automation scripts) enforce the rule without cooperation.

Pattern: When you catch yourself writing the same instruction a second time:

  1. Ask: can this be a lint rule, a metadata flag, a runtime check, or a script?
  2. If yes, encode it. Delete the instruction
  3. If no (genuinely requires judgment), make the instruction more prominent and add an example of the failure mode

Pick the strongest rung. When more than one mechanism would work, choose the strongest the situation allows (an unrepresentable state that cannot compile, then a lint or banned API that fails CI, then a canonical helper, then a runtime check), because agents copy whatever the surrounding code already does and a weaker guard becomes the next template.

Corollary: Don't paper over symptoms. If the fix is structural, ONLY use the structural fix. The instruction IS the symptom.

Feedback loop:

  • Capture every correction. When the human intervenes or tests fail, decide if it's a one-off or a pattern.
  • Route to the right layer. One-off -> brain note. Recurring fix -> skill or lint rule. Systemic issue -> principle.
  • Close the loop. Don't just record. Apply now or create a concrete todo.

Anti-patterns:

  • Acknowledging without recording ("I'll keep that in mind" does not persist)
  • Recording without routing (a brain note about a lint rule that should exist is wasted unless the lint rule gets implemented)
  • Fixing without generalizing (fixing one instance while leaving the recurring pattern intact)

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

architect

無料

Sketch types, signatures, and module structure before code, then stay in the loop while implementation fills in. Use for /architect, 'architect this', 'design this', or non-trivial work where jumping to code would lock in the wrong shape.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sma1lboy/rove1712026年10月12日 更新

arena

無料

Spawn N parallel candidates at the same task, pick a base, graft the strongest parts of the losers into it. Use for /arena, 'arena this', 'throw it in the arena', or when one attempt at a non-trivial artifact would lock in the wrong shape.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sma1lboy/rove1712026年10月12日 更新

在 rove 仓库内跑 auto-motion——把 transcription.srt 拆成多段 MG 动画镜头并拼接成竖屏视频(storyboard 分镜 + theme.md 全片主题 + 逐镜头 claude -p 子进程 + ffmpeg 拼接)。本 skill 是薄 wrapper:解析 auto-motion 模板根,继承 rove 品牌 theme,执行逻辑以 auto-motion 仓库的 canonical SKILL.md 为准。当用户说"跑 auto-motion"、"把这个字幕稿/口播稿做成视频"、"给 rove 做一条 MG 宣传片"时使用。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sma1lboy/rove1712026年10月12日 更新

Find what a change could break somewhere else before it ships, beyond the diff, and prove the one fact it's safe because of by running real code instead of writing it up. Use for 'blast radius of X', 'what could this break', or reviewing a small diff you don't trust.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sma1lboy/rove1712026年10月12日 更新

Draft Rove release notes as Changesets. Writes user-facing entries as `.changeset/*.md` files for `@sma1lboy/rove` (consumed into `packages/rove/CHANGELOG.md` at release time). Use when the user asks for "changelog", "release notes", "what changed", "add a changeset", or before cutting a version. Enforces Rove's no-soft-wrap rule so GitHub release pages render flowing text.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sma1lboy/rove1712026年10月12日 更新

Design an auditable playbook when no narrower one fits: a large migration, an ambitious multi-part change, or work a human reviews after stepping away. Scales rigor to the task, runs a hypothesis loop, and logs decisions via show-me-your-work. Use for /figure-it-out, 'figure it out', a large migration, or when no narrower playbook applies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sma1lboy/rove1712026年10月12日 更新

Sma1lboy のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する