本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

lesson-learned

Analyze recent code changes via git history and extract software engineering lessons. Use when the user asks 'what is the lesson here?', 'what can I learn from this?', 'engineering takeaway', 'what did I just learn?', 'reflect on this code', or wants to extract principles from recent work.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(4)

  • SKILL.md4.6 KB
  • README.md2.7 KB
  • references/anti-patterns.md2.8 KB
  • references/se-principles.md5.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Lesson Learned

Extract specific, grounded software engineering lessons from actual code changes. Not a lecture -- a mirror. Show the user what their code already demonstrates.

Before You Begin

Load the principles reference first.

  1. Read references/se-principles.md to have the principle catalog available
  2. Optionally read references/anti-patterns.md if you suspect the changes include areas for improvement
  3. Determine the scope of analysis (see Phase 1)

Do not proceed until you've loaded at least se-principles.md.

Phase 1: Determine Scope

Ask the user or infer from context what to analyze.

ScopeGit CommandsWhen to Use
Feature branchgit log main..HEAD --oneline + git diff main...HEADUser is on a non-main branch (default)
Last N commitsgit log --oneline -N + git diff HEAD~N..HEADUser specifies a range, or on main (default N=5)
Specific commitgit show <sha>User references a specific commit
Working changesgit diff + git diff --cachedUser says "what about these changes?" before committing

Default behavior:

  • If on a feature branch: analyze branch commits vs main
  • If on main: analyze the last 5 commits
  • If the user provides a different scope, use that

Phase 2: Gather Changes

  1. Run git log with the determined scope to get the commit list and messages
  2. Run git diff for the full diff of the scope
  3. If the diff is large (>500 lines), use git diff --stat first, then selectively read the top 3-5 most-changed files
  4. Read commit messages carefully -- they contain intent that raw diffs miss
  5. Only read changed files. Do not read the entire repo.

Phase 3: Analyze

Identify the dominant pattern -- the single most instructive thing about these changes.

Look for:

  • Structural decisions -- How was the code organized? Why those boundaries?
  • Trade-offs made -- What was gained vs. sacrificed? (readability vs. performance, DRY vs. clarity, speed vs. correctness)
  • Problems solved -- What was the before/after? What made the "after" better?
  • Missed opportunities -- Where could the code improve? (present gently as "next time, consider...")

Map findings to specific principles from references/se-principles.md. Be specific -- quote actual code, reference actual file names and line changes.

Phase 4: Present the Lesson

Use this template:

## Lesson: [Principle Name]

**What happened in the code:**
[2-3 sentences describing the specific change, referencing files and commits]

**The principle at work:**
[1-2 sentences explaining the SE principle]

**Why it matters:**
[1-2 sentences on the practical consequence -- what would go wrong without this, or what goes right because of it]

**Takeaway for next time:**
[One concrete, actionable sentence the user can apply to future work]

If there is a second lesson worth noting (maximum 2 additional):

---

### Also worth noting: [Principle Name]

**In the code:** [1 sentence]
**The principle:** [1 sentence]
**Takeaway:** [1 sentence]

What NOT to Do

AvoidWhyInstead
Listing every principle that vaguely appliesOverwhelming and genericPick the 1-2 most relevant
Analyzing files that were not changedScope creepStick to the diff
Ignoring commit messagesThey contain intent that diffs missRead them as primary context
Abstract advice disconnected from the codeNot actionableAlways reference specific files/lines
Negative-only feedbackDemoralizingLead with what works, then suggest improvements
More than 3 lessonsDilutes the insightOne well-grounded lesson beats seven vague ones

Conversation Style

  • Reflective, not prescriptive. Use the user's own code as primary evidence.
  • Never say "you should have..." -- instead use "the approach here shows..." or "next time you face this, consider..."
  • If the code is good, say so. Not every lesson is about what went wrong. Recognizing good patterns reinforces them.
  • If the changes are trivial (a single config tweak, a typo fix), say so honestly rather than forcing a lesson. "These changes are straightforward -- no deep lesson here, just good housekeeping."
  • Be specific. Generic advice is worthless. Every claim must point to a concrete code change.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Refactor bloated AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, or similar agent instruction files to follow progressive disclosure principles. Splits monolithic files into organized, linked documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

softaworks/agent-toolkit2,5462026年3月6日 更新

Create API handoff documentation for frontend developers. Use when backend work is complete and needs to be documented for frontend integration, or user says 'create handoff', 'document API', 'frontend handoff', or 'API documentation'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

softaworks/agent-toolkit2,5462026年3月6日 更新

Generate architecture documentation using C4 model Mermaid diagrams. Use when asked to create architecture diagrams, document system architecture, visualize software structure, create C4 diagrams, or generate context/container/component/deployment diagrams. Triggers include "architecture diagram", "C4 diagram", "system context", "container diagram", "component diagram", "deployment diagram", "document architecture", "visualize architecture".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

softaworks/agent-toolkit2,5462026年3月6日 更新

codex

無料

Use when the user asks to run Codex CLI (codex exec, codex resume) or references OpenAI Codex for code analysis, refactoring, or automated editing. Uses GPT-5.2 by default for state-of-the-art software engineering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

softaworks/agent-toolkit2,5462026年3月6日 更新

This skill should be used when creating a Claude Code slash command. Use when users ask to "create a command", "make a slash command", "add a command", or want to document a workflow as a reusable command. Essential for creating optimized, agent-executable slash commands with proper structure and best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

softaworks/agent-toolkit2,5462026年3月6日 更新

Create high-quality git commits: review/stage intended changes, split into logical commits, and write clear commit messages (including Conventional Commits). Use when the user asks to commit, craft a commit message, stage changes, or split work into multiple commits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

softaworks/agent-toolkit2,5462026年3月6日 更新

softaworks のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する