Review code for quality, simplicity, and common mistakes before declaring work complete.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Iteratively study and apply elegant coding patterns. Each iteration - understand the code, research what simple and elegant code looks like, apply learnings, verify with CI. Use as a standalone refactoring pass or when the user asks to make code more elegant, simple, or idiomatic.
インストール方法を見るインストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Iteratively study and apply elegant coding patterns. Each iteration: understand the code, research what simple & elegant code looks like, apply learnings, verify with CI.
Run for 3 iterations (or as specified by the user — can be a number or a duration like 2h).
AskUserQuestion tool to ask: should this operate on the whole codebase or only on changes in the current branch/PR?git diff main...HEAD (or the appropriate base branch) to identify changed files and limit all subsequent steps to those files only.まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Review code for quality, simplicity, and common mistakes before declaring work complete.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Do a task end-to-end — implement, PR, CI loop, ship
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit code for correctness and rigor — logic errors, silent error swallowing, wishful thinking, and unjustified fallbacks. This is not a style review; it's a logic review. Use when you want a focused correctness audit separate from the full code-police pass.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write engaging PR titles and descriptions for any forge (GitHub today; Bitbucket planned). Use when creating or updating PRs. Avoids boring bullet lists; uses narrative paragraphs with bold/italic for emphasis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate code (especially LLM-generated) for structural simplicity using Rich Hickey's "Simple Made Easy" framework. Use this skill whenever reviewing a PR, diff, or code snippet for accidental complexity — particularly when the code was generated by an AI coding assistant and line-by-line review isn't feasible. Also use when the user asks about complecting, simplicity vs. easiness, structural coupling, or concept deduplication. Trigger on phrases like "is this simple", "does this complect", "review for complexity", "structural analysis", or any reference to Hickey, Simple Made Easy, or grey-box review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate architecture and module boundaries for volatility-based decomposition using Juval Lowy's framework (from "Righting Software", building on Parnas 1972). Use when reviewing module splits, service boundaries, new abstractions, or any decomposition decision. Trigger on phrases like "where should this boundary be", "how to split this", "module boundaries", "encapsulate change", "volatility", or references to Lowy, Parnas, or "Righting Software". Complements /hickey (interleaved concerns) with a different lens (change encapsulation).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。