本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

skill-align

Audit and fix all Lattice documentation, README, docs/, PROJECT.md, GitHub issue templates, and CLAUDE.md to ensure they are fully aligned with the current skill inventory. Documentation drift is the most common source of user confusion in Lattice — a skill exists in the codebase but not in the docs, or a renamed skill leaves a stale reference in the bug report template. If you've made any change to skills/ and haven't run this, run it now. Use when the user says 'align docs', 'audit docs', 'update documentation', 'skill align', 'check docs are in sync', 'audit skill inventory', 'ensure docs are aligned', 'are the docs up to date', or 'what needs updating'. Standalone — does not call other skills.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md7.8 KB
  • references/audit-checklist.md8.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Lattice Sync

Core responsibility: Keep every public-facing document in sync with the actual skill inventory. The skills directory is the source of truth — all documents derive from it.

Input: None required. Reads the live state of skills/ and all documentation on every run. Optionally: a specific skill name or tier to focus the audit.

Output:

  • A findings report listing every gap as [GAP], [STALE], or [WRONG] with file and description
  • All found gaps fixed in-place across: README.md, docs/how-it-works.md, docs/configuration.md, docs/practical-guide.md, PROJECT.md, CLAUDE.md, .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.yml
  • A final clean confirmation: "No gaps found" or a list of what was changed

How to verify this skill did its job:

grep -rn "requirements atom\|framework:requirements\b" \
  docs/ README.md PROJECT.md CLAUDE.md .github/ skills/ \
  --include="*.md" --include="*.yml"

Any result from this grep means the sync is incomplete. A clean run returns no output.

Also verify: every skill in skills/ appears in the bug_report.yml dropdown and the how-it-works.md inventory tables.

When to run

  • After creating any new atom, molecule, or refiner
  • After renaming or removing a skill
  • After changing a skill's config key, consumed-by relationships, or output path
  • When a user suspects docs are out of date

Phase 1 — Build the live inventory

Read the skills directory tree. STOP: do NOT assume you already know the inventory — always read from files.

find skills/ -name "SKILL.md" | sort

For each SKILL.md found, extract:

  • name: field (frontmatter)
  • tier: inferred from path (atoms/, molecules/, refiners/)
  • Config key: grep for paths\.\w+ in the file
  • Consumes: grep for framework: references (molecules only)
  • Produces: grep for .lattice/standards/ path (refiners only)
  • Output subfolder: grep for .lattice/\w+/ paths (molecules only)

Build a structured inventory:

atoms:    [name, config_key, has_refiner, has_defaults_md]
molecules: [name, composes[], output_subfolder]
refiners:  [name, config_key, produces_path, consumed_by_atom]

Read references/audit-checklist.md for the complete per-document audit rules before starting Phase 2.


Phase 2 — Audit each document

Work through every document in this order. For each, apply the checks in references/audit-checklist.md. STOP: a document with zero findings gets no entry in the report — do not print a heading or a "no gaps" line for it. Log every finding as:

[GAP]    file:line — description of what is missing or wrong
[STALE]  file:line — description of what refers to something that no longer exists
[WRONG]  file:line — description of a relationship (consumed-by, produces) that is incorrect

Documents to audit:

  1. docs/how-it-works.md
  2. docs/configuration.md
  3. docs/practical-guide.md
  4. README.md
  5. PROJECT.md — Skill Conventions, Known subfolders list, and Repository Structure counts all live here
  6. .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.yml
  7. .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/skill_request.yml (generic — only check if skill-specific examples are present)
  8. .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/documentation.yml (generic — only check if skill names appear)
  9. knowledge-base/requirement-forge-requirements.md (if exists — check it matches current skill names)

Present a consolidated findings report before making any changes:

## Lattice Sync — Findings

### docs/how-it-works.md
[GAP] Atoms table missing: requirement-quality
[STALE] Refiners in Depth: requirement-forge-refiner consumed-by says "molecule" but should say "requirement-quality atom"

### .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.yml
[GAP] Skill dropdown missing: requirement-quality (atom)

Total: N gaps, M stale references, P wrong relationships

Ask: "Ready to apply all fixes? Or are there any findings you want to skip?"


Phase 3 — Fix

Apply every agreed fix. For each document, make all changes in a single edit pass. STOP: do not make multiple passes over the same file.

After all fixes are applied, run one final verification grep to confirm no old references remain:

# Check for stale atom names or wrong consumed-by text
grep -rn "<old-name>\|consumed.*molecule\|consumed.*wrong" \
  docs/ README.md PROJECT.md CLAUDE.md .github/ --include="*.md" --include="*.yml"

If the grep returns results, fix them before declaring done.


Phase 4 — Deploy (optional)

If the user wants to push the updated skills to their AI tool's skills directory:

./tools/install.sh /path/to/your/skills/folder

Ask the user for the target path if not provided. Default for Claude Code: ~/.claude/skills/.


Key relationships to always verify

The most error-prone relationship in Lattice documentation is the refiner → atom → molecule chain. Documents frequently drift to say a refiner is "consumed by the molecule" when it's actually consumed by an atom that the molecule composes.

For every refiner in the live inventory, derive the correct relationship dynamically:

  1. Read the refiner's SKILL.md — find which atom it says consumes it (look for "consumed by" or "reads this document")
  2. Read that atom's Config Resolution — confirm it reads the same paths.{key}
  3. Read the molecule that composes that atom — confirm the chain is complete
  4. If any document says the refiner is consumed by the molecule directly (not the atom), flag [WRONG]

Exception: review-refiner is consumed by the review molecule directly — it configures the molecule's workflow, not an atom. This is the only correct molecule-direct consumption in the current framework.


Known .lattice/ subfolders

Every molecule that writes living documents must use a named subfolder. If a new molecule is found that writes to .lattice/ and its subfolder is not in this list, flag it for addition to PROJECT.md:

  • standards/ — refiner outputs
  • context/ — feature anchor docs (context-anchoring atom)
  • learnings/ — operational learnings (learning-harvest atom)
  • reviews/ — review log
  • insights/ — architecture-compass output
  • requirements/ — epic/feature specs (requirement-forge)

What good looks like

The sync is complete when:

  • Every skill in skills/ appears in the docs/how-it-works.md inventory tables
  • Every refiner has a correct entry in docs/configuration.md paths table with the right consumed-by atom
  • Every molecule appears in bug_report.yml skill dropdown
  • Every atom appears in bug_report.yml skill dropdown
  • Every refiner appears in bug_report.yml skill dropdown
  • PROJECT.md known subfolders list covers every .lattice/ output directory
  • No document contains a skill name that no longer exists in source/
  • The pipeline descriptions in README.md and docs/how-it-works.md use current molecule names in the right order
  • Every molecule that hardcodes its own refiner list (refiners-update's map table, lattice-init's Step 3 priority list) has one entry per live refiner in source/refiners/ — no missing, no stale

See references/audit-checklist.md for the exhaustive per-document rules.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Enforce architectural rules when generating or modifying code, and validate proposed designs before approval (design mode). Defaults to clean architecture; supports any architecture style via the architecture-refiner. Validates layer responsibilities, dependency direction, and structural constraints using the loaded architecture rules. Use when generating code, reviewing architecture, creating new files, or when the user mentions 'architecture', 'layers', 'structure', 'dependency rules', 'hexagonal architecture', 'ports and adapters', 'modular monolith', or 'onion architecture'. Also use when reviewing generated code for structural compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

techygarg/lattice1992026年10月10日 更新

Architectural thinking partner for an existing repository — scans the codebase, conducts a structured interview, agrees on current architectural state and recommended direction, and produces a shareable insights document. Scoped to one repository, module, or folder. Does not execute transformation — it orients. Use when the user says 'assess my codebase architecture', 'what direction should my codebase go', 'architecture compass', 'understand my architecture', 'audit architecture drift', 'architectural assessment', or 'help me understand what is wrong with my codebase'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

techygarg/lattice1992026年10月10日 更新

Facilitate a structured conversation to define architecture principles for a repository. Supports multiple architecture styles: clean architecture (default), hexagonal / ports & adapters, modular monolith, or custom. Produces a formal architecture document that the corresponding atom will use. Use when setting up a new project, defining architecture standards, or when the user says 'setup architecture', 'define layers', 'architecture principles', 'help me define my architecture', 'hexagonal architecture', 'modular monolith', 'ports and adapters', or 'define my architecture style'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

techygarg/lattice1992026年10月10日 更新

bug-fix

無料

Investigate, reproduce, and safely fix a bug with regression protection. Composes context, diagnosis, architecture, code quality, and testing guardrails into a reproduce-first repair workflow. Use when the user says 'fix this bug', 'debug this', 'investigate this failure', 'patch this regression', 'repair this issue', or 'why is this broken'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

techygarg/lattice1992026年10月10日 更新

Apply clean code principles when generating or modifying implementation code. Enforces function focus, naming clarity, complexity management, error handling, and self-documenting style. Use when the user mentions 'clean code', 'code quality', 'coding guidelines', or 'implementation quality'. Loaded automatically by the code-generating molecules (code-forge, refactor-safely, bug-fix). This skill governs the craft of writing individual code units -- not architecture (see architecture), not security posture (see secure-coding), not test structure (see test-quality), and not refactoring workflows (see refactor-safely).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

techygarg/lattice1992026年10月10日 更新

Facilitate a structured conversation to define clean code principles for a repository. Produces a formal clean-code.md document that the clean-code atom will use as its override. Use when setting up coding standards, defining code quality rules, or when the user says 'setup clean code', 'define coding standards', 'code quality principles', 'coding guidelines', or 'help me define my code standards'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

techygarg/lattice1992026年10月10日 更新

techygarg のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する