本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

medical-source-failover

Route retrieval of Chinese medical guidelines, consensus statements, regulatory documents, drug information, safety notices, standards, and public-health materials through authoritative originals and verified fallback copies. Use when a canonical medical source is blocked, slow, unavailable, moved, paywalled, or difficult to parse, or when designing and auditing domestic medical-source fallback rules. Do not treat secondary summaries or reposts as independent clinical evidence.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(4)

  • SKILL.md6.9 KB
  • references/document-identity.md3.7 KB
  • references/domestic-source-registry.md9.8 KB
  • references/failover-policy.md4.9 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Medical Source Failover

Retrieve the intended medical document reliably without laundering a secondary source into primary evidence.

Non-negotiable invariant

Degrade the access path, never the document identity or evidentiary standard.

  • Keep authority, document quality, access health, and retrieval priority as separate judgments.
  • A domain's reputation does not grade every item published on it.
  • A repost that reproduces the same document is an access carrier, not independent corroboration.
  • A summary, interpretation, search snippet, news item, or social post may help discover an original; it must not support a precise recommendation, dose, contraindication, or evidence grade.

Load the relevant references

  • For any domestic medical retrieval, read references/domestic-source-registry.md before selecting sources. It defines authoritative scope, discovery-only sources, fallback relationships, and how to extend the registry.
  • When a page is blocked, slow, moved, paywalled, incomplete, or unparseable, read references/failover-policy.md before retrying or switching hosts.
  • Before using a repost, mirror, alternate PDF, cached copy, or database full text, read references/document-identity.md and verify that it is the same document and version.

Workflow

  1. Classify the requested fact before searching:
    • regulation or legal status;
    • approved drug indication, contraindication, dosage, or label;
    • pharmacovigilance or adverse-reaction notice;
    • reimbursement or payment scope;
    • public-health policy, surveillance, or prevention;
    • national or industry standard;
    • clinical guideline or consensus;
    • effectiveness, diagnosis, prognosis, or harm evidence;
    • teaching or explanatory material.
  2. Define the intended document identity from all available fields: normalized title, issuing/developing organization, year/version, document number or DOI, publication venue, and date.
  3. Use the registry to choose a source authoritative for that fact type. Do not choose solely by generic tier or domain.
  4. Attempt the canonical route within the retry budget. Classify access failures; do not repeatedly hammer a protected host.
  5. Follow the failover ladder. Prefer alternate endpoints of the same publisher, official republications, and formal journal versions before verified third-party copies.
  6. Verify document identity and version before extracting content from any fallback. Reject mismatches and incomplete copies.
  7. Check for a newer version, correction, update, retraction, or withdrawal before relying on the text.
  8. Extract only claims supported by the retrieved document. For recommendations, preserve population, intervention, conditions, recommendation strength, evidence certainty, and exceptions when reported.
  9. Cite the original issuer or formal publication. If a fallback carried the text, disclose the fallback separately instead of presenting it as a second source.

Latency-first fast failover

For an ordinary clinical-q-and-a request, keep the same identity standard but use the smallest path:

  • Enter this skill only after the selected canonical route actually fails; do not preload failover references during a successful direct fetch.
  • 401/403/412/CAPTCHA/login/paywall: do not retry the address. Move immediately to the best known L1-L3 route.
  • Timeout/5xx: at most one retry or one approved fallback, not both repeatedly. When latency matters, start one hedged fallback after roughly two seconds and cancel the losing request after a valid copy arrives.
  • Try only one fallback carrier for the same document in the fast path. If it is incomplete or identity cannot be established, return a bounded “正文未核验” result instead of exploring the whole ladder.
  • Do not retrieve a second guideline merely to compensate for an access failure. The target remains the same document unless source-verify explicitly chooses a new normative document.

Failover ladder

  • L0 — Canonical original: issuing body or formal publisher page and complete attachment.
  • L1 — Same-owner alternate: the same body's attachment host, mobile page, bulletin, archive, API, HTML/PDF counterpart, or journal subsite.
  • L2 — Official republication: a complete copy on another government body, joint issuer, government portal, or official gazette.
  • L3 — Formal publication: the guideline's journal HTML/PDF or DOI-bound publisher version.
  • L4 — Verified complete copy: an authorized bibliographic database or complete copy with strong identity verification. Attribute claims to the original document.
  • L5 — Metadata only: registry entry, index, abstract, news item, or interpretation. Use only to continue discovery or report that full text was not verified.

Do not skip identity verification between L2-L4. L5 cannot support document-level clinical claims.

Safe stopping rules

Stop precise extraction and state what remains unverified when any of these applies:

  • year/version, issuer, or unique identifier conflicts;
  • only a summary, snippet, partial screenshot, or truncated copy is available;
  • tables, footnotes, recommendation conditions, appendices, or safety qualifications are missing;
  • a possible correction, replacement, withdrawal, or newer version cannot be resolved;
  • a high-risk drug or procedure claim cannot be located in a complete authoritative document.

When stopping, provide the verified metadata and a bounded statement such as “full text not verified; no precise recommendation or dosage extracted.” Do not fill gaps from memory.

Response record

For material medical claims, retain or report:

  • document title, issuer/developer, year/version, document number or DOI;
  • document type and the fact type it is authoritative for;
  • canonical URL and the URL actually used to retrieve the text;
  • fallback level and identity-verification result;
  • publication/update status and last verification date;
  • exact recommendation, section, table, or page locator when available;
  • unresolved uncertainty or conflict.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

使用 akshare-cli 获取中国及全球金融市场数据(1090+ 个函数)。覆盖股票、基金、期货、债券、外汇、宏观经济、指数、期权、新闻等全领域。当用户需要以下任何一种数据时触发此 skill:股票行情、历史K线、实时报价、涨停跌停池、龙虎榜、板块资金流向、基金/ETF净值、期货行情、债券/可转债、外汇汇率、宏观经济指标(GDP/CPI/PMI)、指数数据、期权数据、财经新闻。关键词触发:akshare、股票、行情、K线、基金、期货、外汇、宏观、国债、可转债、涨停、龙虎榜、板块、资金流向、stock data、market data、financial data、A股、港股、美股。即使用户只是随口提到"看看某个股票"或"最近市场怎么样",也应触发。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

TencentCloud/Octop8,6472026年10月10日 更新

AI 编程工具速查与 60+ 技巧清单——覆盖 Claude Code / Cursor / Codex / Copilot / Aider 等的能力矩阵、核心命令与高频技巧分类。供编程导师在选型与排障时引用。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

TencentCloud/Octop8,6472026年10月10日 更新

快速回答普通教育性医学问题与常见误区。默认用一份国内现行权威指南/共识完成轻量核验并立即作答;不用于个体诊疗、处方剂量、精确推荐定位、药品高风险事实、医保监管或跨版本比较。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

TencentCloud/Octop8,6472026年10月10日 更新

CVM 实例健康诊断,采用智能快速/深度检查模式。涵盖性能和使用问题专业检查、诊断、和修复。支持服务器、PC、虚拟机、容器场景,支持 Linux/macOS/Windows。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

TencentCloud/Octop8,6472026年10月10日 更新

获取热点新闻、热搜、早报、金价、汇率,以及论坛帖子、科技资讯等内容。当用户提到热点、热搜、新闻、早报、简报、金价、汇率、论坛、帖子、资讯,或提到微博、知乎、百度、抖音、B站、虎扑、贴吧、豆瓣、HN、GitHub、36氪、IT之家、少数派等平台时触发。即使用户只是随口问"今天有什么新鲜事"或"最近怎么样",也应使用此 skill。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

TencentCloud/Octop8,6472026年10月10日 更新

当医生提供或更新称谓、地区、医院、科室、职称这5项登记信息,变更科室/地区/职称,或要求停用、删除订阅数据时使用。本技能只管登记的写入/更新/清除;登记完成后的订阅任务创建由 subscription-setup skill 负责。不启用诊断、治疗、疾病SOP、急诊行动卡、个体患者建议、药物剂量、HIS决策支持或医保报销结论能力。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

TencentCloud/Octop8,6472026年10月10日 更新

TencentCloud のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する