本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

api-contract-review

Use when auditing CloudBase cloud API wrappers, MCP tools, generated action metadata, or related docs for outdated or incorrect action names, parameters, casing, request shapes, or missing contract tests, especially during periodic quality review or before preparing corrective PRs.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md6.0 KB
  • references/review-checklist.md1.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

API Contract Review

Review CloudBase cloud API integrations for contract correctness before the repository ships stale, guessed, or undocumented behavior.

When to use this skill

Use this skill when you need to:

  • Review CloudBase cloud API wrappers or MCP tools for outdated or incorrect action or interface names
  • Check whether request parameters, casing, nesting, or request shape drifted away from documentation
  • Audit whether a CloudBase API change is backed by the right contract tests
  • Run a periodic API correctness review before opening corrective PRs
  • Separate confirmed contract bugs from vague "maybe this API changed" speculation

Do NOT use for:

  • General code smell review without a contract-correctness question
  • Regular SDK usage that does not touch CloudBase control-plane or documented API contracts
  • Guessing undocumented behavior from naming intuition
  • Shipping a fix when the documentation still does not support the proposed action or parameter shape

Workflow

Phase 1 — Scope and evidence

  1. Read references/review-checklist.md first.
  2. Identify the review surface:
    • mcp/src/tools/*
    • related tests
    • generated action metadata
    • user-facing docs that describe the same API behavior
  3. Record the exact action, interface, or payload being reviewed before forming conclusions.

Phase 2 — Documentation-first verification

Before judging any implementation, you must read the relevant official documentation first.

Required entry points:

  • CloudBase API overview: https://cloud.tencent.com/document/product/876/34809
  • Dependency-resource API docs when relevant: https://cloud.tencent.com/document/product/876/34808
  • CloudBase Manager SDK docs before approving direct Cloud API usage: https://docs.cloudbase.net/api-reference/manager/node/introduction

Verify the documented contract, not your memory:

  • exact action or interface name
  • required and optional parameters
  • parameter casing and nesting
  • request shape
  • auth model and caller context
  • response shape, task model, and documented limits

If the docs do not clearly support the action, parameter, or behavior, treat the implementation as unverified and stop short of guessing.

Internal parameters

Some parameters are internal to Tencent Cloud and not publicly documented. These parameters are valid but will not appear in the official API documentation.

Known internal parameters:

  • EnvTypes in DescribeEnvs — filters environments by type (e.g., ["weda", "baas"]). This parameter is not in the public documentation but is accepted by the backend.

When you encounter a parameter that:

  1. Does not appear in official documentation
  2. But is confirmed by the team as valid internal behavior

Mark it as an internal parameter in your review report, not as a contract bug.

Internal parameters

Some parameters are internal to Tencent Cloud and not publicly documented. These parameters are valid but will not appear in the official API documentation.

Known internal parameters:

  • EnvTypes in DescribeEnvs — filters environments by type (e.g., ["weda", "baas"]). This parameter is not in the public documentation but is accepted by the backend.

When you encounter a parameter that:

  1. Does not appear in official documentation
  2. But is confirmed by the team as valid internal behavior

Mark it as an internal parameter in your review report, not as a contract bug.

Phase 3 — Repository cross-check

  1. Compare implementation, tests, generated metadata, and user-facing docs against the documented contract.
  2. Mark each mismatch as one of:
    • outdated action or interface name
    • wrong parameter mapping
    • wrong parameter casing or nesting
    • undocumented request shape
    • missing contract test
    • stale public documentation
  3. Prefer nearby targeted tests over broad assumptions.

Phase 4 — Escalation and follow-through

  1. If the contract bug is confirmed and the fix is low-risk, prepare the code, test, and doc updates needed for a focused PR.
  2. Any change to a CloudBase cloud API wrapper or call is incomplete without tests that would fail on the previous wrong contract.
  3. If the issue is serious but still ambiguous, write a report and open an issue instead of shipping a guessed fix.
  4. Route broad code hygiene findings to codebase-audit. Route open-PR repair work to pr-review-fix after the contract finding is confirmed.

Routing

TaskRead
Review CloudBase API contract correctnessreferences/review-checklist.md
Run a broad code audit after contract reviewcodebase-audit
Repair an already-open PR after confirming the contract fixpr-review-fix

Evaluation prompts

Should-trigger

  1. Audit mcp/src/tools for CloudBase API actions whose parameter casing or nesting no longer matches the official docs.
  2. Review this MCP tool and tell me whether it guessed a CloudBase action name instead of proving it from documentation.
  3. Help me prepare a corrective PR for a documented CloudBase API mismatch and make sure the tests would fail on the old payload.

Should-not-trigger

  1. Review this React component for accessibility issues.
  2. Help me polish the README introduction copy.
  3. Fix an open PR that only has lint failures and no API contract question.

Minimum self-check

  • Did I read the relevant official docs before judging the code?
  • Can I point to the exact documented action or interface name?
  • Did I verify parameter casing, nesting, and request shape instead of inferring them?
  • Did I identify the nearest tests that should prove the contract?
  • If I recommend a fix, did I require targeted tests and a focused PR path?
  • If the docs were still unclear, did I stop at report or issue instead of guessing?

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Use this skill for Node.js backend AI via @cloudbase/node-sdk (>=3.16.0) — cloud functions, CloudRun, Express/Koa/NestJS, serverless APIs, scheduled jobs, LLM proxies, agent orchestration. The only SDK supporting image generation (ai.createImageModel + generateImage). Text via ai.createModel with groups cloudbase, hunyuan-exp, or custom-*; model ids (e.g. deepseek-v4-flash, glm-5, kimi-k2.6) go in the `model` field of generateText/streamText. MUST run two-step preflight before code — see body. NOT for browser/Web (use ai-model-web) or Mini Program (use ai-model-wechat).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

TencentCloudBase/CloudBase-AI-Toolkit1,1362026年10月11日 更新

Use this skill when a browser/Web app (React, Vue, Next, Nuxt, static sites, SPAs, dashboards, AI chat UI, 页面, 前端, 网页) needs AI models via @cloudbase/js-sdk. Default routing for Web/frontend AI — call directly from the browser, do NOT propose a Node.js proxy. Covers generateText and streamText; models via ai.createModel with groups cloudbase, hunyuan-exp, or custom-*, model id in the `model` field. MUST run two-step preflight before code — see body. NOT for Node.js backend (use ai-model-nodejs), Mini Program (use ai-model-wechat), or image generation (Node SDK only).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

TencentCloudBase/CloudBase-AI-Toolkit1,1362026年10月11日 更新

Use this skill for WeChat Mini Program AI via wx.cloud.extend.AI (小程序, wx.cloud apps). Covers generateText and streamText with callbacks (onText, onEvent, onFinish); streamText needs a data wrapper, generateText returns the raw response. Models via wx.cloud.extend.AI.createModel with groups hunyuan-exp (小程序成长计划), cloudbase (main managed), or custom-*; model id goes in the data wrapper `model` field. MUST run two-step preflight before code — see body. NOT for browser/Web (use ai-model-web), Node.js backend (use ai-model-nodejs), or image generation (use ai-model-nodejs).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

TencentCloudBase/CloudBase-AI-Toolkit1,1362026年10月11日 更新

CloudBase Node SDK auth guide for server-side identity, user lookup, and custom login tickets. This skill should be used when Node.js code must read caller identity, inspect end users, or bridge an existing user system into CloudBase; not when configuring providers or building client login UI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

TencentCloudBase/CloudBase-AI-Toolkit1,1362026年10月11日 更新

CloudBase auth provider configuration and login-readiness guide. This skill should be used when users need to inspect, enable, disable, or configure auth providers, publishable-key prerequisites, login methods, SMS/email sender setup, or other provider-side readiness before implementing a client or backend auth flow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

TencentCloudBase/CloudBase-AI-Toolkit1,1362026年10月11日 更新

CloudBase Web Authentication Quick Guide for frontend integration after auth-tool has already been checked. Provides concise and practical Web authentication solutions with multiple login methods and complete user management.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

TencentCloudBase/CloudBase-AI-Toolkit1,1362026年10月11日 更新

TencentCloudBase のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する