本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

content-engine

Create platform-native content systems for X, LinkedIn, TikTok, YouTube, newsletters, and repurposed multi-platform campaigns. Use when the user wants social posts, threads, scripts, content calendars, or one source asset adapted cleanly across platforms.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md4.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Content Engine

Build platform-native content without flattening the author's real voice into platform slop.

When to Activate

  • writing X posts or threads
  • drafting LinkedIn posts or launch updates
  • scripting short-form video or YouTube explainers
  • repurposing articles, podcasts, demos, docs, or internal notes into public content
  • building a launch sequence or ongoing content system around a product, insight, or narrative

Non-Negotiables

  1. Start from source material, not generic post formulas.
  2. Adapt the format for the platform, not the persona.
  3. One post should carry one actual claim.
  4. Specificity beats adjectives.
  5. No engagement bait unless the user explicitly asks for it.

Source-First Workflow

Before drafting, identify the source set:

  • published articles
  • notes or internal memos
  • product demos
  • docs or changelogs
  • transcripts
  • screenshots
  • prior posts from the same author

If the user wants a specific voice, build a voice profile from real examples before writing. Use brand-voice as the canonical workflow when voice consistency matters across more than one output.

Voice Handling

brand-voice is the canonical voice layer.

Run it first when:

  • there are multiple downstream outputs
  • the user explicitly cares about writing style
  • the content is launch, outreach, or reputation-sensitive

Reuse the resulting VOICE PROFILE here instead of rebuilding a second voice model. If the user wants Affaan / ECC voice specifically, still treat brand-voice as the source of truth and feed it the best live or source-derived material available.

Hard Bans

Delete and rewrite any of these:

  • "In today's rapidly evolving landscape"
  • "game-changer", "revolutionary", "cutting-edge"
  • "here's why this matters" unless it is followed immediately by something concrete
  • ending with a LinkedIn-style question just to farm replies
  • forced casualness on LinkedIn
  • fake engagement padding that was not present in the source material

Platform Adaptation Rules

X

  • open with the strongest claim, artifact, or tension
  • keep the compression if the source voice is compressed
  • if writing a thread, each post must advance the argument
  • do not pad with context the audience does not need

LinkedIn

  • expand only enough for people outside the immediate niche to follow
  • do not turn it into a fake lesson post unless the source material actually is reflective
  • no corporate inspiration cadence
  • no praise-stacking, no "journey" filler

Short Video

  • script around the visual sequence and proof points
  • first seconds should show the result, problem, or punch
  • do not write narration that sounds better on paper than on screen

YouTube

  • show the result or tension early
  • organize by argument or progression, not filler sections
  • use chaptering only when it helps clarity

Newsletter

  • open with the point, conflict, or artifact
  • do not spend the first paragraph warming up
  • every section needs to add something new

Repurposing Flow

  1. Pick the anchor asset.
  2. Extract 3 to 7 atomic claims or scenes.
  3. Rank them by sharpness, novelty, and proof.
  4. Assign one strong idea per output.
  5. Adapt structure for each platform.
  6. Strip platform-shaped filler.
  7. Run the quality gate.

Deliverables

When asked for a campaign, return:

  • a short voice profile if voice matching matters
  • the core angle
  • platform-native drafts
  • posting order only if it helps execution
  • gaps that must be filled before publishing

Quality Gate

Before delivering:

  • every draft sounds like the intended author, not the platform stereotype
  • every draft contains a real claim, proof point, or concrete observation
  • no generic hype language remains
  • no fake engagement bait remains
  • no duplicated copy across platforms unless requested
  • any CTA is earned and user-approved

Related Skills

  • brand-voice for source-derived voice profiles
  • crosspost for platform-specific distribution
  • x-api for sourcing recent posts and publishing approved X output

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Design, implement, and audit inclusive digital products using WCAG 2.2 Level AA standards. Use this skill to generate semantic ARIA for Web and accessibility traits for Web and Native platforms (iOS/Android).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月10日 更新

Whole site or product — a full web accessibility (a11y) audit against WCAG 2.2, following the WCAG-EM methodology. Defines scope, samples representative pages and flows, runs the automated tier (`accessibility-scan`) and the hands-on manual tier (`accessibility-inspect`), and produces one conformance report. Grades each finding by severity and evidence basis, and states per-criterion conformance as pass, fail, or undetermined (needs a human). Use it for 'audit my site for accessibility', 'is this product accessible', 'a11y audit', 'WCAG or Section 508 conformance report', or any multi-page assessment. Assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`) or diff (use `accessibility-diff`). For a single page use `accessibility-scan`; for hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月10日 更新

Regression check — diff a live page's web accessibility (a11y) violations against a baseline. By default it compares your uncommitted changes (stash-based); pass `--branch [<name>]` to compare against a branch. Reports the new WCAG violations introduced, the ones fixed, and the count of pre-existing ones. Use it for 'did my change break accessibility', 'what a11y issues did this PR add', or as a CI gate. For a full scan of one page use `accessibility-scan`; for a whole site use `accessibility-audit`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月10日 更新

Remediation only — repair web accessibility (a11y) violations against WCAG 2.2 with a baseline, edit, and verify loop. Takes a target (URL, files, directory) or a findings worklist from `accessibility-scan`/`accessibility-inspect`/`accessibility-audit`, applies mechanical fixes as given, leaves TODOs for visual or contextual judgment, and verifies by re-running the baseline check. It only fixes. To find issues use `accessibility-scan` (one page, automated), `accessibility-inspect` (one page, manual), or `accessibility-audit` (whole site, WCAG-EM); to check for regressions use `accessibility-diff`. Use it for 'fix the a11y issues in X', 'make this accessible', 'add missing alt text and labels', 'apply these accessibility fixes', 'remediate these violations'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月10日 更新

One page, hands-on manual tier — drive a live page through the web accessibility (a11y) checks a rule engine can't decide: keyboard operation and focus order, screen-reader names, roles and states from the accessibility tree, reflow and zoom, reduced motion, form errors, and target size. Grades each finding by evidence basis (verified / confirm-with-a-human / human-required) and severity, and closes every criterion in a ledger: verified, flagged, not exercised, or N/A. Locates and assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`). Use it for keyboard testing, focus-order checks, screen-reader or a11y-tree review, reflow and zoom at 200%, or 'is this operable, not just lint-clean'. The automated tier is `accessibility-scan`; `accessibility-audit` runs both across a sampled site.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月10日 更新

One page, automated tier — run the web accessibility (a11y) rule engine against a live page and locate every violation it can detect mechanically. Pass a URL, a config target name (e.g. `accesslint:accessibility-scan dev`), or nothing to use the default target from `accesslint.config.json`. Ensures a debuggable Chrome, runs the @accesslint/core engine over CDP, and returns a worklist of live-DOM WCAG 2.2 violations, each grounded to its DOM selector and source `file:line`. Locates; doesn't edit. Use it for 'is this page accessible', 'check a11y on this URL', 'find contrast and alt-text issues', or to verify a UI change. For hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`; for a whole site or product use `accessibility-audit`; to diff against uncommitted changes or a branch use `accessibility-diff`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月10日 更新

tensology のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する