Design, implement, and audit inclusive digital products using WCAG 2.2 Level AA standards. Use this skill to generate semantic ARIA for Web and accessibility traits for Web and Native platforms (iOS/Android).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cache expensive file processing results using SHA-256 content hashes — path-independent, auto-invalidating, with service layer separation.
インストール方法を見るインストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Cache expensive file processing results (PDF parsing, text extraction, image analysis) using SHA-256 content hashes as cache keys. Unlike path-based caching, this approach survives file moves/renames and auto-invalidates when content changes.
--cache/--no-cache CLI optionUse file content (not path) as the cache key:
import hashlib
from pathlib import Path
_HASH_CHUNK_SIZE = 65536 # 64KB chunks for large files
def compute_file_hash(path: Path) -> str:
"""SHA-256 of file contents (chunked for large files)."""
if not path.is_file():
raise FileNotFoundError(f"File not found: {path}")
sha256 = hashlib.sha256()
with open(path, "rb") as f:
while True:
chunk = f.read(_HASH_CHUNK_SIZE)
if not chunk:
break
sha256.update(chunk)
return sha256.hexdigest()
Why content hash? File rename/move = cache hit. Content change = automatic invalidation. No index file needed.
from dataclasses import dataclass
@dataclass(frozen=True, slots=True)
class CacheEntry:
file_hash: str
source_path: str
document: ExtractedDocument # The cached result
Each cache entry is stored as {hash}.json — O(1) lookup by hash, no index file required.
import json
from typing import Any
def write_cache(cache_dir: Path, entry: CacheEntry) -> None:
cache_dir.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
cache_file = cache_dir / f"{entry.file_hash}.json"
data = serialize_entry(entry)
cache_file.write_text(json.dumps(data, ensure_ascii=False), encoding="utf-8")
def read_cache(cache_dir: Path, file_hash: str) -> CacheEntry | None:
cache_file = cache_dir / f"{file_hash}.json"
if not cache_file.is_file():
return None
try:
raw = cache_file.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
data = json.loads(raw)
return deserialize_entry(data)
except (json.JSONDecodeError, ValueError, KeyError):
return None # Treat corruption as cache miss
Keep the processing function pure. Add caching as a separate service layer.
def extract_with_cache(
file_path: Path,
*,
cache_enabled: bool = True,
cache_dir: Path = Path(".cache"),
) -> ExtractedDocument:
"""Service layer: cache check -> extraction -> cache write."""
if not cache_enabled:
return extract_text(file_path) # Pure function, no cache knowledge
file_hash = compute_file_hash(file_path)
# Check cache
cached = read_cache(cache_dir, file_hash)
if cached is not None:
logger.info("Cache hit: %s (hash=%s)", file_path.name, file_hash[:12])
return cached.document
# Cache miss -> extract -> store
logger.info("Cache miss: %s (hash=%s)", file_path.name, file_hash[:12])
doc = extract_text(file_path)
entry = CacheEntry(file_hash=file_hash, source_path=str(file_path), document=doc)
write_cache(cache_dir, entry)
return doc
| Decision | Rationale |
|---|---|
| SHA-256 content hash | Path-independent, auto-invalidates on content change |
{hash}.json file naming | O(1) lookup, no index file needed |
| Service layer wrapper | SRP: extraction stays pure, cache is a separate concern |
| Manual JSON serialization | Full control over frozen dataclass serialization |
Corruption returns None | Graceful degradation, re-processes on next run |
cache_dir.mkdir(parents=True) | Lazy directory creation on first write |
# BAD: Path-based caching (breaks on file move/rename)
cache = {"/path/to/file.pdf": result}
# BAD: Adding cache logic inside the processing function (SRP violation)
def extract_text(path, *, cache_enabled=False, cache_dir=None):
if cache_enabled: # Now this function has two responsibilities
...
# BAD: Using dataclasses.asdict() with nested frozen dataclasses
# (can cause issues with complex nested types)
data = dataclasses.asdict(entry) # Use manual serialization instead
--cache/--no-cache optionsまだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Design, implement, and audit inclusive digital products using WCAG 2.2 Level AA standards. Use this skill to generate semantic ARIA for Web and accessibility traits for Web and Native platforms (iOS/Android).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Whole site or product — a full web accessibility (a11y) audit against WCAG 2.2, following the WCAG-EM methodology. Defines scope, samples representative pages and flows, runs the automated tier (`accessibility-scan`) and the hands-on manual tier (`accessibility-inspect`), and produces one conformance report. Grades each finding by severity and evidence basis, and states per-criterion conformance as pass, fail, or undetermined (needs a human). Use it for 'audit my site for accessibility', 'is this product accessible', 'a11y audit', 'WCAG or Section 508 conformance report', or any multi-page assessment. Assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`) or diff (use `accessibility-diff`). For a single page use `accessibility-scan`; for hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Regression check — diff a live page's web accessibility (a11y) violations against a baseline. By default it compares your uncommitted changes (stash-based); pass `--branch [<name>]` to compare against a branch. Reports the new WCAG violations introduced, the ones fixed, and the count of pre-existing ones. Use it for 'did my change break accessibility', 'what a11y issues did this PR add', or as a CI gate. For a full scan of one page use `accessibility-scan`; for a whole site use `accessibility-audit`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Remediation only — repair web accessibility (a11y) violations against WCAG 2.2 with a baseline, edit, and verify loop. Takes a target (URL, files, directory) or a findings worklist from `accessibility-scan`/`accessibility-inspect`/`accessibility-audit`, applies mechanical fixes as given, leaves TODOs for visual or contextual judgment, and verifies by re-running the baseline check. It only fixes. To find issues use `accessibility-scan` (one page, automated), `accessibility-inspect` (one page, manual), or `accessibility-audit` (whole site, WCAG-EM); to check for regressions use `accessibility-diff`. Use it for 'fix the a11y issues in X', 'make this accessible', 'add missing alt text and labels', 'apply these accessibility fixes', 'remediate these violations'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
One page, hands-on manual tier — drive a live page through the web accessibility (a11y) checks a rule engine can't decide: keyboard operation and focus order, screen-reader names, roles and states from the accessibility tree, reflow and zoom, reduced motion, form errors, and target size. Grades each finding by evidence basis (verified / confirm-with-a-human / human-required) and severity, and closes every criterion in a ledger: verified, flagged, not exercised, or N/A. Locates and assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`). Use it for keyboard testing, focus-order checks, screen-reader or a11y-tree review, reflow and zoom at 200%, or 'is this operable, not just lint-clean'. The automated tier is `accessibility-scan`; `accessibility-audit` runs both across a sampled site.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
One page, automated tier — run the web accessibility (a11y) rule engine against a live page and locate every violation it can detect mechanically. Pass a URL, a config target name (e.g. `accesslint:accessibility-scan dev`), or nothing to use the default target from `accesslint.config.json`. Ensures a debuggable Chrome, runs the @accesslint/core engine over CDP, and returns a worklist of live-DOM WCAG 2.2 violations, each grounded to its DOM selector and source `file:line`. Locates; doesn't edit. Use it for 'is this page accessible', 'check a11y on this URL', 'find contrast and alt-text issues', or to verify a UI change. For hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`; for a whole site or product use `accessibility-audit`; to diff against uncommitted changes or a branch use `accessibility-diff`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。