本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

content-hash-cache-pattern

Cache expensive file processing results using SHA-256 content hashes — path-independent, auto-invalidating, with service layer separation.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md5.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Content-Hash File Cache Pattern

Cache expensive file processing results (PDF parsing, text extraction, image analysis) using SHA-256 content hashes as cache keys. Unlike path-based caching, this approach survives file moves/renames and auto-invalidates when content changes.

When to Activate

  • Building file processing pipelines (PDF, images, text extraction)
  • Processing cost is high and same files are processed repeatedly
  • Need a --cache/--no-cache CLI option
  • Want to add caching to existing pure functions without modifying them

Core Pattern

1. Content-Hash Based Cache Key

Use file content (not path) as the cache key:

import hashlib
from pathlib import Path

_HASH_CHUNK_SIZE = 65536  # 64KB chunks for large files

def compute_file_hash(path: Path) -> str:
    """SHA-256 of file contents (chunked for large files)."""
    if not path.is_file():
        raise FileNotFoundError(f"File not found: {path}")
    sha256 = hashlib.sha256()
    with open(path, "rb") as f:
        while True:
            chunk = f.read(_HASH_CHUNK_SIZE)
            if not chunk:
                break
            sha256.update(chunk)
    return sha256.hexdigest()

Why content hash? File rename/move = cache hit. Content change = automatic invalidation. No index file needed.

2. Frozen Dataclass for Cache Entry

from dataclasses import dataclass

@dataclass(frozen=True, slots=True)
class CacheEntry:
    file_hash: str
    source_path: str
    document: ExtractedDocument  # The cached result

3. File-Based Cache Storage

Each cache entry is stored as {hash}.json — O(1) lookup by hash, no index file required.

import json
from typing import Any

def write_cache(cache_dir: Path, entry: CacheEntry) -> None:
    cache_dir.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
    cache_file = cache_dir / f"{entry.file_hash}.json"
    data = serialize_entry(entry)
    cache_file.write_text(json.dumps(data, ensure_ascii=False), encoding="utf-8")

def read_cache(cache_dir: Path, file_hash: str) -> CacheEntry | None:
    cache_file = cache_dir / f"{file_hash}.json"
    if not cache_file.is_file():
        return None
    try:
        raw = cache_file.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
        data = json.loads(raw)
        return deserialize_entry(data)
    except (json.JSONDecodeError, ValueError, KeyError):
        return None  # Treat corruption as cache miss

4. Service Layer Wrapper (SRP)

Keep the processing function pure. Add caching as a separate service layer.

def extract_with_cache(
    file_path: Path,
    *,
    cache_enabled: bool = True,
    cache_dir: Path = Path(".cache"),
) -> ExtractedDocument:
    """Service layer: cache check -> extraction -> cache write."""
    if not cache_enabled:
        return extract_text(file_path)  # Pure function, no cache knowledge

    file_hash = compute_file_hash(file_path)

    # Check cache
    cached = read_cache(cache_dir, file_hash)
    if cached is not None:
        logger.info("Cache hit: %s (hash=%s)", file_path.name, file_hash[:12])
        return cached.document

    # Cache miss -> extract -> store
    logger.info("Cache miss: %s (hash=%s)", file_path.name, file_hash[:12])
    doc = extract_text(file_path)
    entry = CacheEntry(file_hash=file_hash, source_path=str(file_path), document=doc)
    write_cache(cache_dir, entry)
    return doc

Key Design Decisions

DecisionRationale
SHA-256 content hashPath-independent, auto-invalidates on content change
{hash}.json file namingO(1) lookup, no index file needed
Service layer wrapperSRP: extraction stays pure, cache is a separate concern
Manual JSON serializationFull control over frozen dataclass serialization
Corruption returns NoneGraceful degradation, re-processes on next run
cache_dir.mkdir(parents=True)Lazy directory creation on first write

Best Practices

  • Hash content, not paths — paths change, content identity doesn't
  • Chunk large files when hashing — avoid loading entire files into memory
  • Keep processing functions pure — they should know nothing about caching
  • Log cache hit/miss with truncated hashes for debugging
  • Handle corruption gracefully — treat invalid cache entries as misses, never crash

Anti-Patterns to Avoid

# BAD: Path-based caching (breaks on file move/rename)
cache = {"/path/to/file.pdf": result}

# BAD: Adding cache logic inside the processing function (SRP violation)
def extract_text(path, *, cache_enabled=False, cache_dir=None):
    if cache_enabled:  # Now this function has two responsibilities
        ...

# BAD: Using dataclasses.asdict() with nested frozen dataclasses
# (can cause issues with complex nested types)
data = dataclasses.asdict(entry)  # Use manual serialization instead

When to Use

  • File processing pipelines (PDF parsing, OCR, text extraction, image analysis)
  • CLI tools that benefit from --cache/--no-cache options
  • Batch processing where the same files appear across runs
  • Adding caching to existing pure functions without modifying them

When NOT to Use

  • Data that must always be fresh (real-time feeds)
  • Cache entries that would be extremely large (consider streaming instead)
  • Results that depend on parameters beyond file content (e.g., different extraction configs)

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Design, implement, and audit inclusive digital products using WCAG 2.2 Level AA standards. Use this skill to generate semantic ARIA for Web and accessibility traits for Web and Native platforms (iOS/Android).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月10日 更新

Whole site or product — a full web accessibility (a11y) audit against WCAG 2.2, following the WCAG-EM methodology. Defines scope, samples representative pages and flows, runs the automated tier (`accessibility-scan`) and the hands-on manual tier (`accessibility-inspect`), and produces one conformance report. Grades each finding by severity and evidence basis, and states per-criterion conformance as pass, fail, or undetermined (needs a human). Use it for 'audit my site for accessibility', 'is this product accessible', 'a11y audit', 'WCAG or Section 508 conformance report', or any multi-page assessment. Assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`) or diff (use `accessibility-diff`). For a single page use `accessibility-scan`; for hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月10日 更新

Regression check — diff a live page's web accessibility (a11y) violations against a baseline. By default it compares your uncommitted changes (stash-based); pass `--branch [<name>]` to compare against a branch. Reports the new WCAG violations introduced, the ones fixed, and the count of pre-existing ones. Use it for 'did my change break accessibility', 'what a11y issues did this PR add', or as a CI gate. For a full scan of one page use `accessibility-scan`; for a whole site use `accessibility-audit`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月10日 更新

Remediation only — repair web accessibility (a11y) violations against WCAG 2.2 with a baseline, edit, and verify loop. Takes a target (URL, files, directory) or a findings worklist from `accessibility-scan`/`accessibility-inspect`/`accessibility-audit`, applies mechanical fixes as given, leaves TODOs for visual or contextual judgment, and verifies by re-running the baseline check. It only fixes. To find issues use `accessibility-scan` (one page, automated), `accessibility-inspect` (one page, manual), or `accessibility-audit` (whole site, WCAG-EM); to check for regressions use `accessibility-diff`. Use it for 'fix the a11y issues in X', 'make this accessible', 'add missing alt text and labels', 'apply these accessibility fixes', 'remediate these violations'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月10日 更新

One page, hands-on manual tier — drive a live page through the web accessibility (a11y) checks a rule engine can't decide: keyboard operation and focus order, screen-reader names, roles and states from the accessibility tree, reflow and zoom, reduced motion, form errors, and target size. Grades each finding by evidence basis (verified / confirm-with-a-human / human-required) and severity, and closes every criterion in a ledger: verified, flagged, not exercised, or N/A. Locates and assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`). Use it for keyboard testing, focus-order checks, screen-reader or a11y-tree review, reflow and zoom at 200%, or 'is this operable, not just lint-clean'. The automated tier is `accessibility-scan`; `accessibility-audit` runs both across a sampled site.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月10日 更新

One page, automated tier — run the web accessibility (a11y) rule engine against a live page and locate every violation it can detect mechanically. Pass a URL, a config target name (e.g. `accesslint:accessibility-scan dev`), or nothing to use the default target from `accesslint.config.json`. Ensures a debuggable Chrome, runs the @accesslint/core engine over CDP, and returns a worklist of live-DOM WCAG 2.2 violations, each grounded to its DOM selector and source `file:line`. Locates; doesn't edit. Use it for 'is this page accessible', 'check a11y on this URL', 'find contrast and alt-text issues', or to verify a UI change. For hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`; for a whole site or product use `accessibility-audit`; to diff against uncommitted changes or a branch use `accessibility-diff`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月10日 更新

tensology のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する