本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

crosspost

Multi-platform content distribution across X, LinkedIn, Threads, and Bluesky. Adapts content per platform using content-engine patterns. Never posts identical content cross-platform. Use when the user wants to distribute content across social platforms.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md3.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Crosspost

Distribute content across platforms without turning it into the same fake post in four costumes.

When to Activate

  • the user wants to publish the same underlying idea across multiple platforms
  • a launch, update, release, or essay needs platform-specific versions
  • the user says "crosspost", "post this everywhere", or "adapt this for X and LinkedIn"

Core Rules

  1. Do not publish identical copy across platforms.
  2. Preserve the author's voice across platforms.
  3. Adapt for constraints, not stereotypes.
  4. One post should still be about one thing.
  5. Do not invent a CTA, question, or moral if the source did not earn one.

Workflow

Step 1: Start with the Primary Version

Pick the strongest source version first:

  • the original X post
  • the original article
  • the launch note
  • the thread
  • the memo or changelog

Use content-engine first if the source still needs voice shaping.

Step 2: Capture the Voice Fingerprint

Run brand-voice first if the source voice is not already captured in the current session.

Reuse the resulting VOICE PROFILE directly. Do not build a second ad hoc voice checklist here unless the user explicitly wants a fresh override for this campaign.

Step 3: Adapt by Platform Constraint

X

  • keep it compressed
  • lead with the sharpest claim or artifact
  • use a thread only when a single post would collapse the argument
  • avoid hashtags and generic filler

LinkedIn

  • add only the context needed for people outside the niche
  • do not turn it into a fake founder-reflection post
  • do not add a closing question just because it is LinkedIn
  • do not force a polished "professional tone" if the author is naturally sharper

Threads

  • keep it readable and direct
  • do not write fake hyper-casual creator copy
  • do not paste the LinkedIn version and shorten it

Bluesky

  • keep it concise
  • preserve the author's cadence
  • do not rely on hashtags or feed-gaming language

Posting Order

Default:

  1. post the strongest native version first
  2. adapt for the secondary platforms
  3. stagger timing only if the user wants sequencing help

Do not add cross-platform references unless useful. Most of the time, the post should stand on its own.

Banned Patterns

Delete and rewrite any of these:

  • "Excited to share"
  • "Here's what I learned"
  • "What do you think?"
  • "link in bio" unless that is literally true
  • generic "professional takeaway" paragraphs that were not in the source

Output Format

Return:

  • the primary platform version
  • adapted variants for each requested platform
  • a short note on what changed and why
  • any publishing constraint the user still needs to resolve

Quality Gate

Before delivering:

  • each version reads like the same author under different constraints
  • no platform version feels padded or sanitized
  • no copy is duplicated verbatim across platforms
  • any extra context added for LinkedIn or newsletter use is actually necessary

Related Skills

  • brand-voice for reusable source-derived voice capture
  • content-engine for voice capture and source shaping
  • x-api for X publishing workflows

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Design, implement, and audit inclusive digital products using WCAG 2.2 Level AA standards. Use this skill to generate semantic ARIA for Web and accessibility traits for Web and Native platforms (iOS/Android).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月10日 更新

Whole site or product — a full web accessibility (a11y) audit against WCAG 2.2, following the WCAG-EM methodology. Defines scope, samples representative pages and flows, runs the automated tier (`accessibility-scan`) and the hands-on manual tier (`accessibility-inspect`), and produces one conformance report. Grades each finding by severity and evidence basis, and states per-criterion conformance as pass, fail, or undetermined (needs a human). Use it for 'audit my site for accessibility', 'is this product accessible', 'a11y audit', 'WCAG or Section 508 conformance report', or any multi-page assessment. Assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`) or diff (use `accessibility-diff`). For a single page use `accessibility-scan`; for hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月10日 更新

Regression check — diff a live page's web accessibility (a11y) violations against a baseline. By default it compares your uncommitted changes (stash-based); pass `--branch [<name>]` to compare against a branch. Reports the new WCAG violations introduced, the ones fixed, and the count of pre-existing ones. Use it for 'did my change break accessibility', 'what a11y issues did this PR add', or as a CI gate. For a full scan of one page use `accessibility-scan`; for a whole site use `accessibility-audit`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月10日 更新

Remediation only — repair web accessibility (a11y) violations against WCAG 2.2 with a baseline, edit, and verify loop. Takes a target (URL, files, directory) or a findings worklist from `accessibility-scan`/`accessibility-inspect`/`accessibility-audit`, applies mechanical fixes as given, leaves TODOs for visual or contextual judgment, and verifies by re-running the baseline check. It only fixes. To find issues use `accessibility-scan` (one page, automated), `accessibility-inspect` (one page, manual), or `accessibility-audit` (whole site, WCAG-EM); to check for regressions use `accessibility-diff`. Use it for 'fix the a11y issues in X', 'make this accessible', 'add missing alt text and labels', 'apply these accessibility fixes', 'remediate these violations'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月10日 更新

One page, hands-on manual tier — drive a live page through the web accessibility (a11y) checks a rule engine can't decide: keyboard operation and focus order, screen-reader names, roles and states from the accessibility tree, reflow and zoom, reduced motion, form errors, and target size. Grades each finding by evidence basis (verified / confirm-with-a-human / human-required) and severity, and closes every criterion in a ledger: verified, flagged, not exercised, or N/A. Locates and assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`). Use it for keyboard testing, focus-order checks, screen-reader or a11y-tree review, reflow and zoom at 200%, or 'is this operable, not just lint-clean'. The automated tier is `accessibility-scan`; `accessibility-audit` runs both across a sampled site.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月10日 更新

One page, automated tier — run the web accessibility (a11y) rule engine against a live page and locate every violation it can detect mechanically. Pass a URL, a config target name (e.g. `accesslint:accessibility-scan dev`), or nothing to use the default target from `accesslint.config.json`. Ensures a debuggable Chrome, runs the @accesslint/core engine over CDP, and returns a worklist of live-DOM WCAG 2.2 violations, each grounded to its DOM selector and source `file:line`. Locates; doesn't edit. Use it for 'is this page accessible', 'check a11y on this URL', 'find contrast and alt-text issues', or to verify a UI change. For hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`; for a whole site or product use `accessibility-audit`; to diff against uncommitted changes or a branch use `accessibility-diff`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月10日 更新

tensology のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する