Design, implement, and audit inclusive digital products using WCAG 2.2 Level AA standards. Use this skill to generate semantic ARIA for Web and accessibility traits for Web and Native platforms (iOS/Android).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Checks DRY/KISS/YAGNI/architecture compliance with quantitative Code Quality Score. Validates decisions via MCP Ref. Reports with SEC-/PERF-/MNT-/ARCH-/BP-/OPT- prefixes.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Paths: File paths (
shared/,references/,../ln-*) are relative to skills repo root. If not found at CWD, locate this SKILL.md directory and go up one level for repo root.
Analyzes Done implementation tasks with quantitative Code Quality Score based on metrics, MCP Ref validation, and issue penalties.
| Input | Required | Source | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
storyId | Yes | args, git branch, kanban, user | Story to process |
Resolution: Story Resolution Chain. Status filter: In Progress, To Review
| Metric | Threshold | Penalty |
|---|---|---|
| Cyclomatic Complexity | ≤10 OK, 11-20 warning, >20 fail | -5 (warning), -10 (fail) per function |
| Function size | ≤50 lines OK, >50 warning | -3 per function |
| File size | ≤500 lines OK, >500 warning | -5 per file |
| Nesting depth | ≤3 OK, >3 warning | -3 per instance |
| Parameter count | ≤4 OK, >4 warning | -2 per function |
Formula: Code Quality Score = 100 - metric_penalties - issue_penalties
Issue penalties by severity:
| Severity | Penalty | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| high | -20 | Security vulnerability, O(n²)+ algorithm, N+1 query |
| medium | -10 | DRY violation, suboptimal approach, missing config |
| low | -3 | Naming convention, minor code smell |
Score interpretation:
| Score | Status | Verdict |
|---|---|---|
| 90-100 | Excellent | PASS |
| 70-89 | Acceptable | CONCERNS |
| <70 | Below threshold | ISSUES_FOUND |
| Prefix | Category | Default Severity | MCP Ref |
|---|---|---|---|
| SEC- | Security (auth, validation, secrets) | high | — |
| SEC-DESTR- | Destructive ops (guards: DB, FS, MIG, ENV, FORCE) | high/medium | — |
| PERF- | Performance (algorithms, configs, bottlenecks) | medium/high | ✓ Required |
| MNT- | Maintainability (DRY, SOLID, complexity, dead code) | medium | — |
| ARCH- | Architecture (layers, boundaries, patterns, contracts) | medium | — |
| BP- | Best Practices (implementation differs from recommended) | medium | ✓ Required |
| OPT- | Optimality (better approach exists for this goal) | medium | ✓ Required |
OPT- subcategories:
| Prefix | Category | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| OPT-OSS- | Open-source replacement available | medium (high if >200 LOC) |
ARCH- subcategories:
| Prefix | Category | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| ARCH-LB- | Layer Boundary: I/O outside infra, HTTP in domain | high |
| ARCH-TX- | Transaction Boundaries: commit() in 3+ layers, mixed UoW ownership | high (CRITICAL if auth/payment) |
| ARCH-DTO- | Missing DTO (4+ params without DTO), Entity Leakage (ORM entity in API response) | medium (high if auth/payment) |
| ARCH-DI- | Dependency Injection: dependencies not replaceable for testing (direct instantiation, no injection mechanism). Exception: small scripts/CLIs where params/closures suffice → skip | medium |
| ARCH-CEH- | Centralized Error Handling: errors silently swallowed, stack traces leak to prod, no consistent error logging. Exception: 50-line scripts → downgrade to LOW | medium (high if no handler at all) |
| ARCH-SES- | Session Ownership: DI session + local session in same module | medium |
| ARCH-AI-SEB | Side-Effect Breadth: 3+ side-effect categories in one leaf function. Conflict Resolution: orchestrator/coordinator functions (imports 3+ services AND delegates sequentially) are EXPECTED to have multiple categories — do NOT flag SEB | medium |
| ARCH-AI-AH | Architectural Honesty: read-named function with write side-effects | medium |
| ARCH-AI-FO | Flat Orchestration: leaf service imports 3+ other services. Orchestrator imports are expected — do NOT flag | medium |
| ARCH-EVENT- | Event Channel Consistency: publisher/subscriber name mismatch (MISMATCH), orphaned channel with no counterpart (ORPHAN) | high (mismatch), medium (orphan) |
PERF- subcategories:
| Prefix | Category | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| PERF-ALG- | Algorithm complexity (Big O) | high if O(n²)+ |
| PERF-CFG- | Package/library configuration | medium |
| PERF-PTN- | Architectural pattern performance | high |
| PERF-DB- | Database queries, indexes | high |
MNT- subcategories:
| Prefix | Category | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| MNT-DC- | Dead code: replaced implementations, unused exports/re-exports, backward-compat wrappers, deprecated aliases | medium (high if public API) |
| MNT-DRY- | DRY violations: duplicate logic across files | medium |
| MNT-GOD- | God Classes: class with >15 methods or >500 lines (not just file size) | medium (high if >1000 lines) |
| MNT-SIG- | Method Signature Quality: boolean flag params, unclear return types, inconsistent naming, >5 optional params | low |
| MNT-ERR- | Error Contract inconsistency: mixed raise + return None in same service | medium |
MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/input_resolution_pattern.md
Resolve storyId: Run Story Resolution Chain per guide (status filter: [In Progress, To Review]).
Load Story (full) and Done implementation tasks (full descriptions) via Linear; skip tasks with label "tests".
Collect changed files (changed_files[]):
MANDATORY READ: shared/references/git_scope_detection.md
changed_files[] from coordinator context → proceed to Enrich step in guideTwo-Layer Detection (MANDATORY):
MANDATORY READ: shared/references/two_layer_detection.md
All threshold-based findings require Layer 2 context analysis. Layer 1 finding without Layer 2 = NOT a valid finding. Before reporting any metric violation, ask: "Is this violation intentional or justified by design?" See Exception column in metrics below.
Calculate code metrics:
MCP Ref Validation (MANDATORY for code changes — SKIP if --skip-mcp-ref flag passed):
MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/research_tool_fallback.md
Fast-track mode: When invoked with
--skip-mcp-ref, skip this entire step (no OPT-, BP-, PERF- checks). Proceed directly to step 6 (static analysis). This reduces cost from ~5000 to ~800 tokens while preserving metrics + static analysis coverage.
Level 1 — OPTIMALITY (OPT-):
ref_search_documentation("{goal} approaches comparison {tech_stack} 2026")Level 2 — BEST PRACTICES (BP-):
ref_search_documentation("{chosen_approach} best practices {tech_stack} 2026")query-docs(library_id, "best practices implementation patterns")Level 3 — PERFORMANCE (PERF-):
query-docsref_search_documentation("{pattern} performance bottlenecks")query-docs(orm_library_id, "query optimization")Triggers for MCP Ref validation:
Analyze code for static issues (assign prefixes):
MANDATORY READ: shared/references/clean_code_checklist.md, shared/references/destructive_operation_safety.md
catch.*Error|handleError, validators: validate|isValid, config access: getSettings|getConfig) across ALL src/ files (count mode). If any pattern appears in 5+ files, sample 3 files (Read 50 lines each) and check structural similarity. If >80% similar → MNT-DRY-CROSS (medium, -10 points): Pattern X duplicated in N files — extract to shared module.export declarations. Then Grep across ALL src/ for import references to those exports. Exports with 0 import references → MNT-DC-CROSS (medium, -10 points): {export} in {file} exported but never imported — remove or mark internal.docs/project/.audit/ln-640/*/645-open-source-replacer*.md exists (glob across dates, take latest), check if any HIGH-confidence replacement matches files changed in current Story. IF match found → create OPT-OSS-{N} issue with module path, goal, recommended package, confidence, stars, license from ln-645 report. Severity: high if >200 LOC, medium otherwise. This check reads local files only — no MCP calls — runs even with --skip-mcp-ref.NOTIFY|pg_notify|\.publish\(|\.emit\( (publishers) and LISTEN|\.subscribe\(|\.on\( (subscribers) in changed_files[]. Cross-reference channel name strings. <!-- Defense-in-depth: also checked by ln-652 Rule 6 -->Calculate Code Quality Score:
Output verdict with score and structured issues.
MANDATORY READ: Load references/output_schema.md
Format output per schema. Add Linear comment with findings.
references/output_schema.mdshared/references/git_scope_detection.mdreferences/code_metrics.md (thresholds and penalties)docs/guides/shared/templates/task_template_implementation.mdshared/references/clean_code_checklist.mdshared/references/research_tool_fallback.mdVersion: 5.1.0 Last Updated: 2026-03-15
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Design, implement, and audit inclusive digital products using WCAG 2.2 Level AA standards. Use this skill to generate semantic ARIA for Web and accessibility traits for Web and Native platforms (iOS/Android).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Whole site or product — a full web accessibility (a11y) audit against WCAG 2.2, following the WCAG-EM methodology. Defines scope, samples representative pages and flows, runs the automated tier (`accessibility-scan`) and the hands-on manual tier (`accessibility-inspect`), and produces one conformance report. Grades each finding by severity and evidence basis, and states per-criterion conformance as pass, fail, or undetermined (needs a human). Use it for 'audit my site for accessibility', 'is this product accessible', 'a11y audit', 'WCAG or Section 508 conformance report', or any multi-page assessment. Assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`) or diff (use `accessibility-diff`). For a single page use `accessibility-scan`; for hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Regression check — diff a live page's web accessibility (a11y) violations against a baseline. By default it compares your uncommitted changes (stash-based); pass `--branch [<name>]` to compare against a branch. Reports the new WCAG violations introduced, the ones fixed, and the count of pre-existing ones. Use it for 'did my change break accessibility', 'what a11y issues did this PR add', or as a CI gate. For a full scan of one page use `accessibility-scan`; for a whole site use `accessibility-audit`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Remediation only — repair web accessibility (a11y) violations against WCAG 2.2 with a baseline, edit, and verify loop. Takes a target (URL, files, directory) or a findings worklist from `accessibility-scan`/`accessibility-inspect`/`accessibility-audit`, applies mechanical fixes as given, leaves TODOs for visual or contextual judgment, and verifies by re-running the baseline check. It only fixes. To find issues use `accessibility-scan` (one page, automated), `accessibility-inspect` (one page, manual), or `accessibility-audit` (whole site, WCAG-EM); to check for regressions use `accessibility-diff`. Use it for 'fix the a11y issues in X', 'make this accessible', 'add missing alt text and labels', 'apply these accessibility fixes', 'remediate these violations'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
One page, hands-on manual tier — drive a live page through the web accessibility (a11y) checks a rule engine can't decide: keyboard operation and focus order, screen-reader names, roles and states from the accessibility tree, reflow and zoom, reduced motion, form errors, and target size. Grades each finding by evidence basis (verified / confirm-with-a-human / human-required) and severity, and closes every criterion in a ledger: verified, flagged, not exercised, or N/A. Locates and assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`). Use it for keyboard testing, focus-order checks, screen-reader or a11y-tree review, reflow and zoom at 200%, or 'is this operable, not just lint-clean'. The automated tier is `accessibility-scan`; `accessibility-audit` runs both across a sampled site.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
One page, automated tier — run the web accessibility (a11y) rule engine against a live page and locate every violation it can detect mechanically. Pass a URL, a config target name (e.g. `accesslint:accessibility-scan dev`), or nothing to use the default target from `accesslint.config.json`. Ensures a debuggable Chrome, runs the @accesslint/core engine over CDP, and returns a worklist of live-DOM WCAG 2.2 violations, each grounded to its DOM selector and source `file:line`. Locates; doesn't edit. Use it for 'is this page accessible', 'check a11y on this URL', 'find contrast and alt-text issues', or to verify a UI change. For hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`; for a whole site or product use `accessibility-audit`; to diff against uncommitted changes or a branch use `accessibility-diff`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。