Design, implement, and audit inclusive digital products using WCAG 2.2 Level AA standards. Use this skill to generate semantic ARIA for Web and accessibility traits for Web and Native platforms (iOS/Android).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Checks cyclomatic complexity, nesting, long methods, god classes, method signatures, O(n²), N+1 queries, constants management. Returns findings.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Paths: File paths (
shared/,references/,../ln-*) are relative to skills repo root. If not found at CWD, locate this SKILL.md directory and go up one level for repo root.
Specialized worker auditing code complexity, method signatures, algorithms, and constants management.
MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md.
Receives contextStore with: tech_stack, best_practices, principles, codebase_root, output_dir.
Domain-aware: Supports domain_mode + current_domain (see audit_output_schema.md#domain-aware-worker-output).
MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/two_layer_detection.md for detection methodology.
scan_path (domain-aware if specified), extract output_dirscan_path (not codebase_root)Grep(pattern="if.*if.*if", path=scan_path) for nesting detectiondomain: domain_name (if domain-aware)shared/templates/audit_worker_report_template.md, write to {output_dir}/624-quality-{domain}.md (or 624-quality.md in global mode) in single Write callWhat: Too many decision points in single function (> 10)
Detection:
eslint-plugin-complexity, radon (Python), gocyclo (Go)Severity:
Recommendation: Split function, extract helper methods, use early returns
Effort: M-L (depends on complexity)
What: Nested if/for/while blocks too deep
Detection:
Severity:
Recommendation: Extract functions, use guard clauses, invert conditions
Effort: M (refactor structure)
What: Functions too long, doing too much
Detection:
Severity:
Recommendation: Split into smaller functions, apply Single Responsibility
Effort: M (extract logic)
What: Files with too many responsibilities
Detection:
Severity:
Recommendation: Split into multiple files, apply separation of concerns
Effort: L (major refactor)
What: Functions with excessive parameters
Detection:
Severity:
Recommendation: Use parameter object, builder pattern, default parameters
Effort: S-M (refactor signature + calls)
What: Inefficient nested loops over collections
Detection:
for (i) { for (j) { ... } }arr.map(x => arr.filter(...))Severity:
Recommendation: Use hash maps, optimize with single pass, use better data structures
Effort: M (algorithm redesign)
What: ORM lazy loading causing N+1 queries
Detection:
users.forEach(u => u.getPosts())Severity:
Recommendation: Use eager loading, batch queries, JOIN
Effort: M (change ORM query)
What: Magic numbers/strings, decentralized constants, duplicates
Detection:
| Issue | Pattern | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Magic numbers | Hardcoded numbers in conditions/calculations | if (status === 2) |
| Magic strings | Hardcoded strings in comparisons | if (role === 'admin') |
| Decentralized | Constants scattered across files | MAX_SIZE = 100 in 5 files |
| Duplicates | Same value multiple times | STATUS_ACTIVE = 1 in 3 places |
| No central file | Missing constants.ts or config.py | No single source of truth |
Severity:
Recommendation:
constants.ts, config.py, constants.go)const STATUS_ACTIVE = 1Effort: M (extract constants, update imports, consolidate)
What: Poor method contracts reducing readability and maintainability
Detection:
| Issue | Pattern | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Boolean flag params | >=2 boolean params in signature | def process(data, is_async: bool, skip_validation: bool) |
| Too many optional params | >=3 optional params with defaults | def query(db, limit=10, offset=0, sort="id", order="asc") |
| Inconsistent verb naming | Different verbs for same operation type in one module | get_user() vs fetch_account() vs load_profile() |
| Unclear return type | -> dict, -> Any, -> tuple without TypedDict/NamedTuple | def get_stats() -> dict instead of -> StatsResponse |
Severity:
Recommendation:
get_ for sync, fetch_ for async, etc.)Effort: S-M (refactor signatures + callers)
What: Functions triggering cascading chains of external side-effects (DB writes → notifications → metrics → limits).
Detection:
MANDATORY READ: shared/references/ai_ready_architecture.md for side-effect markers, false positive exclusions, and opaque sink rules.
**/services/**/*.{py,ts,js,cs,java} to find service filesSeverity:
Conflict Resolution: IF function is an orchestrator/coordinator (imports 3+ services AND delegates to them sequentially) → ARCH-AI-SEB does NOT apply. Orchestrators are EXPECTED to have multiple side-effect categories. Only flag SEB for leaf functions.
Recommendation: Refactor to flat orchestration — extract side-effects into independent sink functions. See reference.
Effort: M-L
Output: Also generate summary Pipe/Sink table per module:
| Module | Sinks (0-1) | Shallow Pipes (2) | Deep Pipes (3+) | Sink Ratio |
|---|
MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md and shared/references/audit_scoring.md.
MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md and shared/templates/audit_worker_report_template.md.
Write report to {output_dir}/624-quality-{domain}.md (or 624-quality.md in global mode) with category: "Code Quality" and checks: cyclomatic_complexity, deep_nesting, long_methods, god_classes, too_many_params, quadratic_algorithms, n_plus_one, magic_numbers, method_signatures, cascade_depth.
Return summary to coordinator:
Report written: docs/project/.audit/ln-620/{YYYY-MM-DD}/624-quality-orders.md
Score: X.X/10 | Issues: N (C:N H:N M:N L:N)
MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md.
domain_mode="domain-aware", scan ONLY scan_path (not entire codebase)domain field in each finding when domain-awareMANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md.
{output_dir}/624-quality-{domain}.md (atomic single Write call)shared/references/audit_output_schema.mdVersion: 3.0.0 Last Updated: 2025-12-23
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Design, implement, and audit inclusive digital products using WCAG 2.2 Level AA standards. Use this skill to generate semantic ARIA for Web and accessibility traits for Web and Native platforms (iOS/Android).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Whole site or product — a full web accessibility (a11y) audit against WCAG 2.2, following the WCAG-EM methodology. Defines scope, samples representative pages and flows, runs the automated tier (`accessibility-scan`) and the hands-on manual tier (`accessibility-inspect`), and produces one conformance report. Grades each finding by severity and evidence basis, and states per-criterion conformance as pass, fail, or undetermined (needs a human). Use it for 'audit my site for accessibility', 'is this product accessible', 'a11y audit', 'WCAG or Section 508 conformance report', or any multi-page assessment. Assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`) or diff (use `accessibility-diff`). For a single page use `accessibility-scan`; for hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Regression check — diff a live page's web accessibility (a11y) violations against a baseline. By default it compares your uncommitted changes (stash-based); pass `--branch [<name>]` to compare against a branch. Reports the new WCAG violations introduced, the ones fixed, and the count of pre-existing ones. Use it for 'did my change break accessibility', 'what a11y issues did this PR add', or as a CI gate. For a full scan of one page use `accessibility-scan`; for a whole site use `accessibility-audit`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Remediation only — repair web accessibility (a11y) violations against WCAG 2.2 with a baseline, edit, and verify loop. Takes a target (URL, files, directory) or a findings worklist from `accessibility-scan`/`accessibility-inspect`/`accessibility-audit`, applies mechanical fixes as given, leaves TODOs for visual or contextual judgment, and verifies by re-running the baseline check. It only fixes. To find issues use `accessibility-scan` (one page, automated), `accessibility-inspect` (one page, manual), or `accessibility-audit` (whole site, WCAG-EM); to check for regressions use `accessibility-diff`. Use it for 'fix the a11y issues in X', 'make this accessible', 'add missing alt text and labels', 'apply these accessibility fixes', 'remediate these violations'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
One page, hands-on manual tier — drive a live page through the web accessibility (a11y) checks a rule engine can't decide: keyboard operation and focus order, screen-reader names, roles and states from the accessibility tree, reflow and zoom, reduced motion, form errors, and target size. Grades each finding by evidence basis (verified / confirm-with-a-human / human-required) and severity, and closes every criterion in a ledger: verified, flagged, not exercised, or N/A. Locates and assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`). Use it for keyboard testing, focus-order checks, screen-reader or a11y-tree review, reflow and zoom at 200%, or 'is this operable, not just lint-clean'. The automated tier is `accessibility-scan`; `accessibility-audit` runs both across a sampled site.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
One page, automated tier — run the web accessibility (a11y) rule engine against a live page and locate every violation it can detect mechanically. Pass a URL, a config target name (e.g. `accesslint:accessibility-scan dev`), or nothing to use the default target from `accesslint.config.json`. Ensures a debuggable Chrome, runs the @accesslint/core engine over CDP, and returns a worklist of live-DOM WCAG 2.2 violations, each grounded to its DOM selector and source `file:line`. Locates; doesn't edit. Use it for 'is this page accessible', 'check a11y on this URL', 'find contrast and alt-text issues', or to verify a UI change. For hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`; for a whole site or product use `accessibility-audit`; to diff against uncommitted changes or a branch use `accessibility-diff`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。