Design, implement, and audit inclusive digital products using WCAG 2.2 Level AA standards. Use this skill to generate semantic ARIA for Web and accessibility traits for Web and Native platforms (iOS/Android).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes single pattern implementation, calculates 4 scores (compliance, completeness, quality, implementation), identifies gaps. Invoked by ln-640 or standalone.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Paths: File paths (
shared/,references/,../ln-*) are relative to skills repo root. If not found at CWD, locate this SKILL.md directory and go up one level for repo root.
L3 Worker that analyzes a single architectural pattern against best practices and calculates 4 scores.
Out of Scope (owned by ln-624-code-quality-auditor):
- pattern: string # Pattern name (e.g., "Job Processing")
- locations: string[] # Known file paths/directories
- bestPractices: object # Best practices from MCP Ref/Context7/WebSearch
- output_dir: string # e.g., "docs/project/.audit/ln-640/{YYYY-MM-DD}"
Note: All patterns arrive pre-verified (passed ln-640 Phase 1d applicability gate with >= 2 structural components confirmed).
MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/two_layer_detection.md for detection methodology.
MANDATORY READ: Load ../ln-640-pattern-evolution-auditor/references/pattern_library.md — use "Pattern Detection (Grep)" table for detection keywords per pattern.
IF pattern.source == "adaptive":
# Pattern discovered by coordinator Phase 1b — evidence already provided
files = pattern.evidence.files
SKIP detection keyword search (already done in Phase 1b)
ELSE:
# Baseline pattern — use library detection keywords
files = Glob(locations)
additional = Grep("{pattern_keywords}", "**/*.{ts,js,py,rb,cs,java}")
files = deduplicate(files + additional)
FOR EACH file IN files (limit: 10 key files):
Read(file)
Extract: components, patterns, error handling, logging, tests
MANDATORY READ: Load ../ln-640-pattern-evolution-auditor/references/scoring_rules.md — follow Detection column for each criterion.
| Score | Source in scoring_rules.md | Max |
|---|---|---|
| Compliance | "Compliance Score" section — industry standard, naming, conventions, anti-patterns | 100 |
| Completeness | "Completeness Score" section — required components table (per pattern), error handling, tests | 100 |
| Quality | "Quality Score" section — method length, complexity, code smells, SOLID | 100 |
| Implementation | "Implementation Score" section — compiles, production usage, integration, monitoring | 100 |
Scoring process for each criterion:
FOR EACH bestPractice NOT implemented:
issues.append({
severity: "HIGH" | "MEDIUM" | "LOW",
category: "compliance" | "completeness" | "quality" | "implementation",
issue: description,
suggestion: how to fix,
effort: "S" | "M" | "L"
})
# Layer 2 context check (MANDATORY):
# Deviation documented in code comment or ADR? → downgrade to LOW
# Pattern intentionally simplified for project scale? → skip
gaps = {
missingComponents: required components not found in code,
inconsistencies: conflicting or incomplete implementations
}
MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md and shared/references/audit_scoring.md.
Diagnostic sub-scores (0-100 each) are calculated separately and reported in AUDIT-META for diagnostic purposes only:
MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md and shared/templates/audit_worker_report_template.md.
# Build pattern name slug: "Job Processing" → "job-processing"
slug = pattern.name.lower().replace(" ", "-")
# Build markdown report in memory with:
# - AUDIT-META (extended: score [penalty-based] + diagnostic score_compliance/completeness/quality/implementation)
# - Checks table (compliance_check, completeness_check, quality_check, implementation_check)
# - Findings table (issues sorted by severity)
# - DATA-EXTENDED: {pattern, codeReferences, gaps, recommendations}
Write to {output_dir}/641-pattern-{slug}.md (atomic single Write call)
Report written: docs/project/.audit/ln-640/{YYYY-MM-DD}/641-pattern-job-processing.md
Score: 7.9/10 (C:72 K:85 Q:68 I:90) | Issues: 3 (H:1 M:2 L:0)
MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md.
MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md.
{output_dir}/641-pattern-{slug}.md (atomic single Write call)../ln-640-pattern-evolution-auditor/references/scoring_rules.md../ln-640-pattern-evolution-auditor/references/pattern_library.mdshared/references/research_tool_fallback.mdVersion: 2.0.0 Last Updated: 2026-02-08
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Design, implement, and audit inclusive digital products using WCAG 2.2 Level AA standards. Use this skill to generate semantic ARIA for Web and accessibility traits for Web and Native platforms (iOS/Android).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Whole site or product — a full web accessibility (a11y) audit against WCAG 2.2, following the WCAG-EM methodology. Defines scope, samples representative pages and flows, runs the automated tier (`accessibility-scan`) and the hands-on manual tier (`accessibility-inspect`), and produces one conformance report. Grades each finding by severity and evidence basis, and states per-criterion conformance as pass, fail, or undetermined (needs a human). Use it for 'audit my site for accessibility', 'is this product accessible', 'a11y audit', 'WCAG or Section 508 conformance report', or any multi-page assessment. Assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`) or diff (use `accessibility-diff`). For a single page use `accessibility-scan`; for hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Regression check — diff a live page's web accessibility (a11y) violations against a baseline. By default it compares your uncommitted changes (stash-based); pass `--branch [<name>]` to compare against a branch. Reports the new WCAG violations introduced, the ones fixed, and the count of pre-existing ones. Use it for 'did my change break accessibility', 'what a11y issues did this PR add', or as a CI gate. For a full scan of one page use `accessibility-scan`; for a whole site use `accessibility-audit`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Remediation only — repair web accessibility (a11y) violations against WCAG 2.2 with a baseline, edit, and verify loop. Takes a target (URL, files, directory) or a findings worklist from `accessibility-scan`/`accessibility-inspect`/`accessibility-audit`, applies mechanical fixes as given, leaves TODOs for visual or contextual judgment, and verifies by re-running the baseline check. It only fixes. To find issues use `accessibility-scan` (one page, automated), `accessibility-inspect` (one page, manual), or `accessibility-audit` (whole site, WCAG-EM); to check for regressions use `accessibility-diff`. Use it for 'fix the a11y issues in X', 'make this accessible', 'add missing alt text and labels', 'apply these accessibility fixes', 'remediate these violations'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
One page, hands-on manual tier — drive a live page through the web accessibility (a11y) checks a rule engine can't decide: keyboard operation and focus order, screen-reader names, roles and states from the accessibility tree, reflow and zoom, reduced motion, form errors, and target size. Grades each finding by evidence basis (verified / confirm-with-a-human / human-required) and severity, and closes every criterion in a ledger: verified, flagged, not exercised, or N/A. Locates and assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`). Use it for keyboard testing, focus-order checks, screen-reader or a11y-tree review, reflow and zoom at 200%, or 'is this operable, not just lint-clean'. The automated tier is `accessibility-scan`; `accessibility-audit` runs both across a sampled site.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
One page, automated tier — run the web accessibility (a11y) rule engine against a live page and locate every violation it can detect mechanically. Pass a URL, a config target name (e.g. `accesslint:accessibility-scan dev`), or nothing to use the default target from `accesslint.config.json`. Ensures a debuggable Chrome, runs the @accesslint/core engine over CDP, and returns a worklist of live-DOM WCAG 2.2 violations, each grounded to its DOM selector and source `file:line`. Locates; doesn't edit. Use it for 'is this page accessible', 'check a11y on this URL', 'find contrast and alt-text issues', or to verify a UI change. For hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`; for a whole site or product use `accessibility-audit`; to diff against uncommitted changes or a branch use `accessibility-diff`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。