404-page
無料Use when reviewing templates, rendered HTML, or shared components related to Create a custom 404 error page. Validate the final browser-facing markup, not just the source framework abstraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing large SPA bundles, new dependency additions, or routes that feel slow to hydrate. Focus on code that is not required for the initial view and can move behind route transitions, user interaction, or viewport-based loading.
インストール方法を見るインストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
A 500 KB JavaScript bundle blocks page interactivity for 3–5 seconds on a mid-range mobile device even after the bytes arrive — JS must be parsed and compiled before execution. Code splitting means users only download and parse the code they actually need for the current page, dramatically improving Time to Interactive.
Identify any large third-party imports or feature modules in this file that could be loaded lazily with dynamic import() instead of statically.
Convert the identified static imports to dynamic imports using import() and add appropriate loading states.
Explain JavaScript code splitting, how dynamic import() works, and how to implement route-based splitting in a SPA.
Inspect route modules, heavy feature imports, and third-party libraries loaded on initial render. Flag dependencies that can move behind import(), route boundaries, or user-triggered flows without breaking the first meaningful paint.
For full implementation details, code examples, and framework-specific guidance,
see references/rule.md.
Rule page: https://frontendchecklist.io/rules/javascript/code-splitting
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Use when reviewing templates, rendered HTML, or shared components related to Create a custom 404 error page. Validate the final browser-facing markup, not just the source framework abstraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing metadata, crawlability, structured data, or indexability related to Create a dedicated About page. Verify the rendered HTML and HTTP response rather than relying only on source files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing component libraries, page flows, or CI pipelines that need repeatable accessibility checks. Automated testing is strongest at catching structural and attribute-level issues; it does not replace keyboard, screen reader, and manual UX testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing sign-in, sign-up, MFA, CAPTCHA, recovery, and re-auth flows. Evaluate the full authentication path, including error handling and backup methods, not just the primary login form.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing templates, rendered HTML, or shared components related to Make notifications accessible. Validate the final browser-facing markup, not just the source framework abstraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns related to Use semantic table markup for screen readers. Check native semantics first, then inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, and screen-reader output where relevant.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。