404-page
無料Use when reviewing templates, rendered HTML, or shared components related to Create a custom 404 error page. Validate the final browser-facing markup, not just the source framework abstraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing support UI across multi-page flows such as checkout, onboarding, account recovery, or support journeys. Compare multiple pages in the same variation instead of reviewing a single page alone.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Users who need help during a task should not have to hunt for it on every screen. Predictable placement reduces stress and makes support easier to find when a user is already struggling.
Audit repeated help mechanisms across this set of pages. Check whether contact links, chat triggers, help-center links, or support phone numbers appear in the same relative order on each page.
Move repeated help mechanisms into a consistent location and keep their relative order stable across the flow at the same breakpoint.
Explain WCAG Consistent Help, what counts as a repeated help mechanism, and why consistent serial order matters more than pixel-perfect placement.
Review page chrome, support UI, and responsive layouts related to Keep repeated help mechanisms in a consistent location. Flag exact pages or breakpoints where repeated help moves to a different relative position.
For full implementation details, code examples, and framework-specific guidance,
see references/rule.md.
Rule page: https://frontendchecklist.io/rules/accessibility/consistent-help
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Use when reviewing templates, rendered HTML, or shared components related to Create a custom 404 error page. Validate the final browser-facing markup, not just the source framework abstraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing metadata, crawlability, structured data, or indexability related to Create a dedicated About page. Verify the rendered HTML and HTTP response rather than relying only on source files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing component libraries, page flows, or CI pipelines that need repeatable accessibility checks. Automated testing is strongest at catching structural and attribute-level issues; it does not replace keyboard, screen reader, and manual UX testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing sign-in, sign-up, MFA, CAPTCHA, recovery, and re-auth flows. Evaluate the full authentication path, including error handling and backup methods, not just the primary login form.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing templates, rendered HTML, or shared components related to Make notifications accessible. Validate the final browser-facing markup, not just the source framework abstraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns related to Use semantic table markup for screen readers. Check native semantics first, then inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, and screen-reader output where relevant.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。