Use when reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns related to Fix empty and broken links. Check native semantics first, then inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, and screen-reader output where relevant.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Screen readers announce empty links as just 'link' with no context—users have no idea where they lead or what they do, making navigation impossible.
Scan for links with no text content (empty anchor tags, icon-only links without labels). Verify all links have accessible names via text content, aria-label, or aria-labelledby. Check for broken link destinations.
Add descriptive text to empty links. For icon-only links, add aria-label describing the destination. Use visually-hidden text if visible labels are not desired. Remove or fix broken links.
Explain how screen readers announce empty links as just 'link' with no context, leaving users unable to understand where the link leads or what action it performs.
Review the rendered markup and interactive states that affect Fix empty and broken links. Flag exact elements, roles, labels, focus behavior, or keyboard interactions that violate the rule, and note how to verify the fix with browser accessibility tooling or assistive tech.
For full implementation details, code examples, and framework-specific guidance,
see references/rule.md.
Rule page: https://frontendchecklist.io/rules/accessibility/empty-links
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Use when reviewing templates, rendered HTML, or shared components related to Create a custom 404 error page. Validate the final browser-facing markup, not just the source framework abstraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing metadata, crawlability, structured data, or indexability related to Create a dedicated About page. Verify the rendered HTML and HTTP response rather than relying only on source files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing component libraries, page flows, or CI pipelines that need repeatable accessibility checks. Automated testing is strongest at catching structural and attribute-level issues; it does not replace keyboard, screen reader, and manual UX testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing sign-in, sign-up, MFA, CAPTCHA, recovery, and re-auth flows. Evaluate the full authentication path, including error handling and backup methods, not just the primary login form.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing templates, rendered HTML, or shared components related to Make notifications accessible. Validate the final browser-facing markup, not just the source framework abstraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns related to Use semantic table markup for screen readers. Check native semantics first, then inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, and screen-reader output where relevant.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。