404-page
無料Use when reviewing templates, rendered HTML, or shared components related to Create a custom 404 error page. Validate the final browser-facing markup, not just the source framework abstraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing stylesheets, component styles, and responsive behavior related to Apply Flexbox best practices. Check the rendered layout across breakpoints and interaction states before proposing a fix.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Flexbox is one of the most used CSS features, but its unintuitive default values (flex-shrink:1, min-width:auto) cause layout bugs that are hard to diagnose. Understanding the flex shorthand and the min-width:0 fix prevents the most common Flexbox breakage scenarios.
Review this CSS for common Flexbox mistakes: missing min-width:0 on text-containing flex children, using margin instead of gap for spacing, and improper flex shorthand usage.
Fix the Flexbox layout issues: add min-width:0 where needed, replace inter-item margins with gap, and correct flex shorthand values.
Explain how flex-grow, flex-shrink, and flex-basis work, what the flex shorthand means, and why min-width:0 fixes text overflow in flex layouts.
Review stylesheets, component styles, and responsive states related to Apply Flexbox best practices. Flag exact selectors, declarations, or breakpoints that violate the rule in the rendered UI.
For full implementation details, code examples, and framework-specific guidance,
see references/rule.md.
Rule page: https://frontendchecklist.io/rules/css/flexbox-patterns
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Use when reviewing templates, rendered HTML, or shared components related to Create a custom 404 error page. Validate the final browser-facing markup, not just the source framework abstraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing metadata, crawlability, structured data, or indexability related to Create a dedicated About page. Verify the rendered HTML and HTTP response rather than relying only on source files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing component libraries, page flows, or CI pipelines that need repeatable accessibility checks. Automated testing is strongest at catching structural and attribute-level issues; it does not replace keyboard, screen reader, and manual UX testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing sign-in, sign-up, MFA, CAPTCHA, recovery, and re-auth flows. Evaluate the full authentication path, including error handling and backup methods, not just the primary login form.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing templates, rendered HTML, or shared components related to Make notifications accessible. Validate the final browser-facing markup, not just the source framework abstraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns related to Use semantic table markup for screen readers. Check native semantics first, then inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, and screen-reader output where relevant.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。