Use when auditing URL structures for word separator format, generating slugs from titles, or planning a URL migration from underscores or spaces to hyphens with appropriate redirects.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Google's search systems interpret hyphens in URLs as word boundaries, enabling it to match the URL against individual keyword queries. Underscores join words into a single token, meaning /seo_practices is seen as one word 'seopractices' rather than two separate words 'seo' and 'practices'.
-) to separate words in URLs — Google treats hyphens as word separators, underscores as part of the word/best-seo-practices is better than /best_seo_practices or /bestseopracticesInspect the URL path segment of each page. Flag any URL that contains: (1) Underscores (_) as word separators (e.g., /best_practices). (2) Spaces encoded as %20 or + in path segments. (3) Mixed separators in the same URL (e.g., /best-practices_guide). Report the count of non-hyphenated URLs by category.
_ with -, spaces/%20 with -.Google's John Mueller has confirmed that Google interprets hyphens as word separators in URLs, but treats underscores as word joiners. This means a URL with underscores matches fewer individual keyword queries. For example, /web_design would match 'web_design' as a single token, while /web-design matches both 'web design' and 'webdesign' queries.
Parse all URL paths used in the application's router or CMS slug fields. Flag any path segment containing _ characters between words or any %20 space encoding. Verify slug-generation utilities produce lowercase hyphenated output. Check redirect rules to confirm old underscore URLs are permanently (301) redirected to their hyphenated equivalents.
For full implementation details, code examples, and framework-specific guidance,
see references/rule.md.
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Use when reviewing templates, rendered HTML, or shared components related to Create a custom 404 error page. Validate the final browser-facing markup, not just the source framework abstraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing metadata, crawlability, structured data, or indexability related to Create a dedicated About page. Verify the rendered HTML and HTTP response rather than relying only on source files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing component libraries, page flows, or CI pipelines that need repeatable accessibility checks. Automated testing is strongest at catching structural and attribute-level issues; it does not replace keyboard, screen reader, and manual UX testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing sign-in, sign-up, MFA, CAPTCHA, recovery, and re-auth flows. Evaluate the full authentication path, including error handling and backup methods, not just the primary login form.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing templates, rendered HTML, or shared components related to Make notifications accessible. Validate the final browser-facing markup, not just the source framework abstraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns related to Use semantic table markup for screen readers. Check native semantics first, then inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, and screen-reader output where relevant.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。