Use when reviewing CI coverage, automated checks, or test strategy related to Write integration tests for key workflows. Focus on whether the rule is continuously verified, not just documented.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Unit tests verify individual functions in isolation, but they can't catch the bugs that occur when those functions interact — a perfectly correct validation function and a correct database function can still fail when wired together incorrectly. Integration tests catch these wiring bugs before they reach production, where they're expensive to diagnose.
Identify the key integration points in this codebase — where API routes call services, where services interact with the database, and where components interact with state management. Are these tested?
Write integration tests for the identified critical paths, testing the interactions between components rather than each in isolation.
Explain integration testing, how it differs from unit and E2E testing, and what tools to use for API and component integration tests.
Review tests, CI workflows, and enforcement points related to Write integration tests for key workflows. Flag exact gaps where the rule is not automatically verified or where failures do not block regressions.
For full implementation details, code examples, and framework-specific guidance,
see references/rule.md.
Rule page: https://frontendchecklist.io/rules/testing/integration-testing
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Use when reviewing templates, rendered HTML, or shared components related to Create a custom 404 error page. Validate the final browser-facing markup, not just the source framework abstraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing metadata, crawlability, structured data, or indexability related to Create a dedicated About page. Verify the rendered HTML and HTTP response rather than relying only on source files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing component libraries, page flows, or CI pipelines that need repeatable accessibility checks. Automated testing is strongest at catching structural and attribute-level issues; it does not replace keyboard, screen reader, and manual UX testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing sign-in, sign-up, MFA, CAPTCHA, recovery, and re-auth flows. Evaluate the full authentication path, including error handling and backup methods, not just the primary login form.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing templates, rendered HTML, or shared components related to Make notifications accessible. Validate the final browser-facing markup, not just the source framework abstraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns related to Use semantic table markup for screen readers. Check native semantics first, then inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, and screen-reader output where relevant.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。