audit
無料Run comprehensive code audit for architecture, dead code, and test quality. Use when reviewing overall codebase health, checking for architectural violations, or before marking a feature complete.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Behavior-first feature development — use when building new capabilities, continuing feature work, or when work introduces new state or multiple user flows. Discovers desired behavior through examples and scenarios before implementation. Do NOT use for bug fixes, typos, or small isolated changes.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Behavior-first development for features. Discovery → Scenarios → Implementation.
Iron Law: DEFINE BEHAVIOR BEFORE IMPLEMENTATION
Features progress through phases. Track in ticket frontmatter:
---
type: feature
phase: implement # intake | define-behavior | scenario-gate | implement | verify | done
---
Phase meanings:
| Phase | What happens | Details |
|---|---|---|
intake | Context check, discovery | DISCOVERY.md |
define-behavior | Writing Given/When/Then | SCENARIOS.md |
scenario-gate | Validating scenarios | SCENARIOS.md |
implement | Outside-in TDD | TDD.md |
verify | Evidence gate: /verify + /audit | VERIFY.md |
done | Close ticket | DONE.md |
Update phase when:
implement (test-layer + sequencing happens at the scenario-gate exit)implementverifydoneLeaving a phase is gated on an independent review of that phase's work — not
your own pass. (Your own inline pass is Tier 1: /self-review, per asset, as you
author.) The phase exit is reviewed by a fresh reviewer with no conversation
history so the author can't grade their own work: run it in a forked subagent —
a skill with context: fork, or an explicit subagent — hand it only the phase's
artifacts and the ticket's scope, and let its verdict decide. On a pass,
record the stamp that unblocks the advance:
bun .safeword/hooks/write-review-stamp.ts --phase <phase you are leaving>
If the reviewer finds blocking issues, fix them and re-review — don't stamp. To
skip a trivial or docs-only phase, append a reason
(… --phase <phase> "<why no independent review is needed>"). The phase-advance
gate enforces this when the review gate is enabled, and is inert otherwise.
When user references a ticket, resume work:
phase:[ ] in test-definitionsResume by phase:
| Phase | Resume action |
|---|---|
intake | Start understanding (propose-and-converge) |
define-behavior | Continue drafting scenarios |
scenario-gate | Continue validating scenarios |
implement | Find first unchecked scenario, run TDD |
verify | Run /verify and /audit, write verify.md |
done | Close ticket (verify.md must exist) |
.safeword-project/tickets/{id}-{slug}/ticket.md.safeword-project/tickets/{id}-{slug}/test-definitions.mdLoad the appropriate file based on current phase:
| Phase | File |
|---|---|
intake | DISCOVERY.md |
define-behavior | SCENARIOS.md |
scenario-gate | SCENARIOS.md |
implement | TDD.md |
verify | VERIFY.md |
done | DONE.md |
For splitting large features, see SPLITTING.md.
phase: field/bdd to overrideまだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Run comprehensive code audit for architecture, dead code, and test quality. Use when reviewing overall codebase health, checking for architectural violations, or before marking a feature complete.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants to explore options, weigh approaches, or think through uncertainty before committing to a direction. Collaborative brainstorming and rubber ducking — divergence-first thinking partner.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Kill zombie dev servers and test processes. Use when ports are blocked, processes are hanging, or test runners won't start.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Root cause debugging before fixes. Use when investigating bugs, diagnosing test failures, troubleshooting unexpected behavior, or when previous fix attempts failed. Enforces investigate-first discipline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extract tacit knowledge through non-obvious microquestions — things only the user knows that can't be found in code, docs, or research. Use when you're about to guess at intent, context, or constraints during SAFEWORD's understanding flow. Also use when user says 'ask me', 'what do you need to know', or when another skill (bdd, brainstorm, debug) needs user context before proceeding. Do NOT use for questions answerable by reading the codebase or searching the web.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explore and debate options with fresh documentation and research before committing. Use when facing a real decision with multiple plausible approaches — library/framework choice, architecture call, API or schema design, algorithm selection, or any communication / strategy call where being wrong has cost. Enumerates relevant research domains, looks up current docs and evidence-based methods, weighs options on correctness and elegance, resists bloat. Do NOT use for divergent ideation (brainstorm), extracting user intent (elicit), or reviewing already-written code (quality-review).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。