Pressure-test an assumption, decision, or inherited constraint — Socratic cross-examination that forces you to defend or abandon your position
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write a client update — identify what was done, what's next, and surface risks before they become surprises. End of day, start of day, or end of week.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
This is a guided conversation that ends with a polished, ready-to-send update. Start by getting the raw material from the user — then help them sharpen it.
Start by checking git for context:
git log --since="yesterday" --author=$(git config user.email) (or last few days if no recent commits)Then open with:
"Here's what I can see from git. Before I help you write this — what did you actually spend your time on? Git doesn't always tell the full story."
Wait for their answer. Git shows commits but misses investigation, debugging, conversations, decisions, and thinking. Their answer fills the gaps.
Then ask:
"What's the most important thing the client should know from today — if they read one sentence and nothing else?"
Wait. This forces them to prioritise. Most updates bury the lead.
Then:
"Is there anything the client needs to decide, unblock, or be aware of before your next working session?"
Wait. This surfaces blockers and risks before they become surprises.
Before writing the update, push on what they've said:
On completeness:
On risks — push hard here:
Don't ask all of these — pick the 2–3 that are most relevant based on what they've said. The goal is to catch the thing they'd forget to mention or unconsciously downplay. Consultants instinctively soften risks in updates — push against that.
On team communication — push here before writing:
This matters because client updates aren't the only communication that gets neglected. Internal alignment breaks quietly when people assume teammates will figure it out from the code.
Produce a clean, ready-to-send update. Keep it short — clients don't read long updates. Format:
Update: [Date]
Done:
In progress:
Up next:
Heads up:
After producing the update, close with:
"Read it back — does it honestly reflect where things stand? Is there anything you softened that should be said more directly?"
Wait for their answer. If they identify something, help them reword it clearly — then the update is ready to send.
Efficient and honest. This isn't a ceremony — it's a communication tool. Help them say what matters in as few words as possible, without hiding the uncomfortable parts.
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Pressure-test an assumption, decision, or inherited constraint — Socratic cross-examination that forces you to defend or abandon your position
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explain what a piece of code does — a specific file, class, or method in close detail, or a user-facing flow as a concise system overview. What it does and why, not whether it's good.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Take one new feature slice from idea to reviewed, committed code in a single guided pass — scope it into the smallest shippable slice, build it test-first with strict TDD, review and fix the diff, then commit it. Chains slice → test-driven-development → the built-in /code-review → git-commit. Not for reviewing an existing PR, upgrades, or open-ended design questions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn the working changes into one or more atomic commits with well-written messages. Use whenever the user runs /git-commit or asks to commit their work, wrap up a feature, or "commit what I have."
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepare to deliver difficult technical news to a client — a conversational prep session before the hard conversation happens
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Walk through the Designer/Developer wrap-up checklist for offboarding a client engagement — conversationally, one item at a time.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。