本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

second-brain-backfill

Import a large archive into the vault in controlled batches: triage what is worth ingesting, process oldest first, checkpoint after every batch, and keep cost visible. Use this skill whenever the user wants to import years of bookmarks, an export from another notes app, a downloads folder, a chat history dump, or says "backfill", "bulk import", "process my archive". Do NOT use for ingesting one or a few new sources, which is second-brain-ingest.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md2.0 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Backfill an archive

A backfill is where cost and quality both go wrong quietly. Done in the wrong order it also inverts the vault's history, because later sources should update pages that earlier ones created.

Core rule

Oldest first, ten sources per batch, stop for a go-ahead between batches.

Workflow

  1. Triage before ingesting. Read titles and first paragraphs. Sort into worth-ingesting, keep-in-raw, and delete. Most archives are half dead links and things saved but never opened.
  2. Order by date, oldest first. Run it the other way and every old source arrives as a contradiction against a page that already has the final answer.
  3. Batch of ten. Ingest following second-brain-ingest.
  4. Checkpoint: update index.md, append to log.md, commit with the batch range in the message, report counts.
  5. Stop and wait before the next batch.
  6. Full lint at the end. Large imports always leave orphans and duplicates.

Output format

Batch <n>/<total>: <range>
Ingested: <n> sources -> <n> new pages, <n> updated, <n> links
Skipped: <n> (reason)
Running total: <n> of <n>
Next batch: <what it contains>

Calibration

Read every page the first batch produced, all of them. A flaw you let through in batch one is a flaw in four hundred pages by the end, and fixing it afterwards costs more than the original run.

If the archive is over about two hundred sources, propose a filter before starting rather than quoting the full cost.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Audit an agent's context layout against the four places: system prompt, tools, history, tail. Use when the user asks to audit, review or fix their agent's context, prompt caching, token spend per turn, or CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md layout. Read-only: reports findings and a fix list, changes nothing. Do NOT use for writing evals (evals-bootstrap) or for loop design (goal-test).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

undefined-ui/second-brain-os1,0222026年10月10日 更新

Scaffold a first eval suite for an agent: mine real failures into cases, write behavioural checks over traces, and generate the runner. Use when the user wants evals, regression tests for an agent, a golden set, or asks how to know a prompt/model change did not break things. Do NOT use for a single task's done-check (goal-test) or for auditing context (context-audit).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

undefined-ui/second-brain-os1,0222026年10月10日 更新

Find the decisions in a pipeline that do not need the expensive model and propose the gate for each: a rule, a classic classifier, or a small model, with fail-closed routing. Use when the user asks to cut model costs or latency, says the big model handles everything, or wants a triage / routing / filter layer in front of an agent. Analysis plus an optional baseline scaffold. Do NOT use for auditing context layout (context-audit) or for building eval suites (evals-bootstrap).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

undefined-ui/second-brain-os1,0222026年10月10日 更新

goal-test

無料

Turn a vague task into a testable definition of done and generate an executable goal-test script for it, optionally with a bounded retry loop around a headless agent. Use when the user wants to run an agent in a loop, asks how to know when an agent task is finished, or says a goal like "improve X" needs to become checkable. Do NOT use for building eval suites over many cases — that is evals-bootstrap.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

undefined-ui/second-brain-os1,0222026年10月10日 更新

Audit an agent's harness against the four rings: containment, guides, sensors, permissions. Use when the user asks whether their agent setup is safe, wants a review of sandboxing / permissions / hooks / AGENTS.md guardrails, or asks what a bad session could break. Read-only: reports the blast radius and a hardening list, changes nothing. Do NOT use for context layout (context-audit) or cost routing (gate-check).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

undefined-ui/second-brain-os1,0222026年10月10日 更新

Trace where the user's recorded position on something has shifted: superseded claims, contradictions between sources of different dates, and what evidence moved them. Use this skill when the user asks what they have changed their mind about, how their thinking on a topic developed, what they used to believe, or wants a quarterly look back at their own positions. Do NOT use for finding contradictions between sources with no time dimension, or for a current-state answer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

undefined-ui/second-brain-os1,0222026年10月10日 更新

undefined-ui のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する