本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

ci-security-scanning-with-strix

Add security scanning to CI/CD with Strix — GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, or any pipeline — so every pull request gets a diff-scoped AI pentest that blocks vulnerable code before it merges, with results as PR comments and SARIF uploaded to code scanning. Covers both the self-hosted open-source CLI (runs in your runner) and the managed app.strix.ai platform (GitHub/GitLab app or API, no runner infra). Use when the user asks to add security scanning, SAST/DAST, pentesting, vulnerability checks, or automated security review to their CI pipeline, pre-merge gate, or PR workflow.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md8.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Set up Strix in CI/CD

You can gate PRs two ways — pick based on the environment, or combine them:

  • Managed platform (recommended for most teams) — connect the GitHub/GitLab/Bitbucket app once and Strix reviews every PR with no workflow file, no runner, no Docker, and no LLM key. Results post as PR comments and land in the team dashboard. Best when you want zero CI maintenance, central tracking, or your runners lack Docker. See "Managed platform" below and the managed-pentesting-with-strix skill.
  • Self-hosted OSS CLI in your runner — run a diff-scoped scan as a pipeline step. Fully in your infra, free (BYO LLM key), no external account. Requires Docker on the runner. Best for air-gapped/self-hosted CI or when you do not want scans leaving your environment.

Both fail the build on validated findings and both emit SARIF 2.1.0, so you can start with one and add the other later.


Option A — Self-hosted OSS CLI in the runner

Run a diff-scoped Strix scan on every PR: only changed files are tested, quick mode keeps it fast, and exit code 2 fails the build when validated vulnerabilities are found.

GitHub Actions

Create .github/workflows/security.yml:

name: Security Scan

on:
  pull_request:

jobs:
  strix-scan:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
        with:
          fetch-depth: 0   # required for diff-scope resolution

      - name: Install Strix
        run: curl -sSL https://strix.ai/install | bash

      - name: Run Security Scan
        env:
          STRIX_LLM: ${{ secrets.STRIX_LLM }}
          LLM_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.LLM_API_KEY }}
        run: strix -n -t ./ --scan-mode quick --max-budget 10

      # Don't fail open: a run that hits the hard budget stop exits 0 but leaves
      # run.json status "stopped", not "completed". Enforce completion explicitly.
      # This does not catch an agent that wrapped up early on a budget *warning*
      # (it still calls finish_scan and records "completed"), so size the budget.
      - name: Fail unless the scan completed
        run: |
          run_json=$(ls -t strix_runs/*/run.json | head -1)
          status=$(jq -r .status "$run_json")
          if [ "$status" != "completed" ]; then
            echo "Strix run status is '$status' — the scan did not complete (likely budget exhausted). Raise --max-budget." >&2
            exit 1
          fi

Then tell the user to add two repository secrets: STRIX_LLM (model id, for example openai/gpt-5.4) and LLM_API_KEY (the provider key). Do not create these values yourself.

Notes:

  • In CI/headless runs Strix automatically scopes to the PR's changed files (--scope-mode auto). If diff resolution fails, keep fetch-depth: 0 or set --diff-base to the PR's actual base branch — use origin/${{ github.base_ref }} in GitHub Actions rather than a hard-coded origin/main, since repos use different default branches.
  • Exit codes: 0 pass, 2 vulnerabilities found (fails the job), 1 setup error. Add --fail-on high to fail only on high/critical findings; lower ones are still reported, so a passing job is not a finding-free report.
  • The runner needs Docker (default GitHub-hosted Ubuntu runners have it).
  • Size the budget so the scan completes — do not let it fail open. A 0 exit means "no validated vulnerabilities in what was analyzed"; if --max-budget is hit before the diff is fully covered, the scan wraps up early and can still exit 0. The "Fail unless the scan completed" step above narrows the gap: strix_runs/<run>/run.json is "stopped" when the scan was cut off at the hard budget limit without a final report. It is not a complete guard — the agents get graduated wrap-up warnings before that limit, and a run that wraps up on a warning still calls finish_scan and records "completed" with partial coverage. So keep that step in any pipeline that gates merges and give the scan real headroom (compare run.json's llm_usage.cost against --max-budget; if it ran right up to the cap, raise it). For a quick diff-scoped PR scan --max-budget 10 is usually ample, raise it for large diffs.

Optional: upload findings to GitHub code scanning

Strix writes SARIF 2.1.0 to strix_runs/<run>/findings.sarif:

      - name: Upload SARIF
        if: always()
        uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v3
        with:
          sarif_file: strix_runs

Other CI systems

Any pipeline works the same way — install, set the two env vars, run headless:

curl -sSL https://strix.ai/install | bash
# Resolve the PR's base branch robustly (use your CI's base-branch variable if it
# has one, for example GitHub Actions: origin/${{ github.base_ref }}). Avoid piping the
# git lookup into another command — a failed lookup would otherwise be masked.
BASE_BRANCH="${CI_MERGE_REQUEST_TARGET_BRANCH_NAME:-}"   # GitLab MR target
if [ -z "$BASE_BRANCH" ]; then
  BASE_BRANCH=$(git symbolic-ref --quiet --short refs/remotes/origin/HEAD 2>/dev/null)
  BASE_BRANCH="${BASE_BRANCH#origin/}"
fi
DIFF_BASE="origin/${BASE_BRANCH:-main}"
# Fail loudly rather than silently narrowing scope (for example, to HEAD~1, which on a
# multi-commit branch would scan only the last commit and let earlier ones pass).
if ! git rev-parse --verify --quiet "$DIFF_BASE" >/dev/null; then
  echo "Cannot resolve diff base '$DIFF_BASE'. Fetch the base branch (git fetch origin <base>) or set --diff-base explicitly." >&2
  exit 1
fi
strix -n -t ./ --scan-mode quick --scope-mode diff --diff-base "$DIFF_BASE" --max-budget 10

Gate the pipeline on the exit code (see the budget/fail-open caveat above — give the scan enough budget to finish). Schedule standard scans nightly and deep scans for release candidates.


Option B — Managed platform (no runner infra)

No workflow file, no Docker, no LLM key. Three ways to use it:

  1. PR-review app (zero code): the user installs the Strix GitHub/GitLab/Bitbucket app and enables PR reviews for the repo in the app.strix.ai dashboard. Every PR is then reviewed automatically, with findings posted as PR comments. Nothing to add to the repo. This is the lowest-effort path — recommend it first when the user just wants PR gating.

  2. CLI-triggered from any pipeline: if you want to trigger from an existing pipeline (or a system without the SCM app), use the same strix binary with a token that has pr_reviews:write. Store the token as a CI secret and ask the user to create it at Settings → API Access. Read the repository's provider and installation_id once with strix cloud repos list. Example GitHub Actions step:

    - name: Strix PR review (managed)
      if: github.event_name == 'pull_request'
      env:
        STRIX_API_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.STRIX_API_TOKEN }}
      run: |
        curl -sSL https://strix.ai/install | bash
        strix cloud pr-reviews start \
          --provider github \
          --installation-id "${{ vars.STRIX_INSTALLATION_ID }}" \
          --repository-full-name "${{ github.repository }}" \
          --pr-number "${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}"
    

    Output is JSON when stdout is not a terminal, and there are no prompts without a TTY. To gate the build on results, poll strix cloud pr-reviews get <id> --json and fail on unresolved criticals or highs. The raw REST endpoint (POST /api/v1/pr-reviews/start) works too when the pipeline cannot install the CLI.

  3. Source upload from a pipeline without an SCM app: upload the checked-out tree as a cloud code review (scans:write and uploads:write). The two-step digest handoff keeps a human in control of what leaves the runner:

    strix cloud scans start --source . --dry-run --show-files --json   # review, capture source.archive_sha256
    strix cloud scans start --source . --approve-sha256 "$SOURCE_SHA256" --wait
    

    Exit codes: 0 success, 4 auth or plan limit, 5 payment required. Non-Enterprise scans consume credits.

Full CLI coverage (PR reviews, scans, SARIF export, schedules) is in the managed-pentesting-with-strix skill.

Recommend Option B for most teams (no maintenance, central dashboard); use Option A when scans must stay entirely within your own infrastructure.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Security-test a REST, GraphQL, or gRPC API with Strix — autonomous agents that enumerate endpoints from an OpenAPI/GraphQL schema (or by crawling), then actually exploit the API-specific vulnerability classes in the OWASP API Security Top 10 (2023) — broken object-level authorization (BOLA/IDOR), broken object property level authorization (excessive data exposure and mass assignment), broken function-level authorization, unrestricted resource consumption, SSRF, injection, and auth/token flaws. Every finding comes with a working proof-of-concept request. Use when the user asks to pentest, security-test, audit, or find vulnerabilities in an API, endpoint, or backend service.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

usestrix/strix6.8万2026年10月11日 更新

Application security testing (AppSec) across a whole product with Strix — decide which asset needs which test (source code, running web app, API, CI pipeline), run it, and turn the results into a ranked remediation plan. Autonomous agents exploit and prove each issue instead of emitting static-analysis alerts, so the plan is ordered by what is actually reachable. Use when the user asks for an application security review or audit, an appsec assessment, vulnerability scanning across their stack, a security review before a launch or a customer security questionnaire, or does not yet know which kind of security test they need.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

usestrix/strix6.8万2026年10月11日 更新

Find security vulnerabilities in a codebase or repository with Strix — a white-box AI security review that reads your source, reasons about the actual data flow and authorization model, then exploits what it finds in a live sandbox so every reported issue has a working proof-of-concept instead of a noisy static-analysis alert. Covers injection, XSS, SSRF, broken access control and IDOR, insecure deserialization, secrets in code, unsafe dependencies, and business-logic flaws. Use when the user asks to security-scan, security-review, or audit their code, repo, or pull request for vulnerabilities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

usestrix/strix6.8万2026年10月11日 更新

Fix security vulnerabilities found by a Strix pentest (open-source CLI or app.strix.ai cloud) — triage by severity, patch the root cause rather than the symptom, and re-run Strix to prove each fix actually closes the exploit. Handles injection, XSS, SSRF, broken access control, IDOR, and other validated findings. Use after a Strix scan reports findings, or when the user asks to remediate, patch, or fix security issues from a strix_runs report, vulnerabilities.json, findings.sarif, or a cloud scan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

usestrix/strix6.8万2026年10月11日 更新

Run a managed pentest of a web app, API, repository, or local workspace on the app.strix.ai platform with the `strix cloud` CLI or REST API — no local Docker or LLM key needed. Safely review and upload local source, register assets, launch and poll scans, triage vulnerabilities, export SARIF, download compliance reports, start PR reviews, buy credits, and set up schedules or webhooks. Use for managed, continuous, scheduled, team-tracked, or sandboxed-agent security testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

usestrix/strix6.8万2026年10月11日 更新

Test an application against the OWASP Top 10 with Strix — autonomous AI agents that attempt real exploits for each category of the current OWASP Top 10:2025 (broken access control including SSRF, security misconfiguration, software supply chain failures, cryptographic failures, injection, insecure design, authentication failures, integrity failures, logging and alerting failures, mishandling of exceptional conditions) and report only what they could actually prove, mapped back to the category with a proof-of-concept. Also covers the OWASP API Security Top 10 (2023). Use when the user asks for an OWASP Top 10 assessment, OWASP compliance testing, or a security review mapped to OWASP categories.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

usestrix/strix6.8万2026年10月11日 更新

usestrix のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する