本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

submit-experiment-results

Post material interim assignment updates, then commit and submit a terminal experiment result through the typed Senpai GitHub tools.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md3.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Submit experiment results

Interim assignment comments

Use post_assignment_comment when the advisor asked for a response or the experiment is blocked or materially delayed. Use a fresh comment_id for each new message and reuse that ID only for an exact retry. Keep the PR concise rather than mirroring routine internal narration.

First make the repository worktree clean by committing only the assigned change. Collect the current local commit SHA and the current remote assignment-branch SHA. Build the strict ExperimentResult required by submit_experiment_result:

  • the assignment repository, PR, assignment ID, revision ID, student, and current expected head SHA;
  • terminal status, hypothesis, and bounded summary;
  • every W&B run ID, URL, and terminal state;
  • the primary metric comparison; and
  • the same local commit SHA.

Call submit_experiment_result with exactly this operation-specific payload. Do not add PR-body text, per-run metrics, hyperparameters, or aliases such as head_sha, previous_head_sha, success, or min; put those details in the bounded summary instead.

{
  "branch": "student/experiment",
  "remote_branch_sha_before_push": "REMOTE_SHA_BEFORE_PUSH",
  "result": {
    "assignment": {
      "repo": "owner/repo",
      "pr_number": 123,
      "assignment_id": "assignment-id",
      "revision_id": "LATEST_REVISION_ID",
      "expected_head_sha": "LOCAL_COMMIT_SHA",
      "student": "student-name"
    },
    "status": "succeeded",
    "hypothesis": "The falsifiable hypothesis tested.",
    "summary": "The conclusion, evidence, caveats, and important per-run metrics (maximum 4,000 characters).",
    "runs": [
      {
        "run_id": "wandb-run-id",
        "url": "https://wandb.ai/entity/project/runs/wandb-run-id",
        "state": "finished"
      }
    ],
    "primary_metric": {
      "name": "validation/metric",
      "direction": "minimize",
      "baseline": 1.23,
      "candidate": 1.10,
      "delta": -0.13
    },
    "commit_sha": "LOCAL_COMMIT_SHA"
  }
}

Use one of succeeded, failed, inconclusive, or cancelled for result status; minimize or maximize for metric direction; and finished, failed, crashed, or killed for each run. primary_metric may be omitted when no finite comparison exists. Refresh the PR first and use its latest assignment revision_id; a mid-turn advisor revision supersedes an earlier one.

That single tool call derives the PR and local result head from result, lease-pushes the clean assignment branch, verifies the new PR head, upserts the authenticated structured result, marks the PR ready, and reconciles status:review. That label is the durable advisor notification. Exact replay of the same result is safe. Once result evidence is published for that revision and commit, changed evidence requires a new commit or assignment revision; the tool will not rewrite the reviewed result in place. Do not run git push, edit labels, write result markers, or call gh pr ready yourself.

If any run is still active or could change the conclusion, keep the assignment in progress and register it with monitor_training; do not submit a terminal result.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Look up any arxiv paper on alphaxiv.org to get a structured AI-generated overview. This is faster and more reliable than trying to read a raw PDF.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

wandb/senpai372026年10月6日 更新

Operator-side analysis of historical ML experiment PRs in Senpai research tracks. Use this skill whenever the user asks to: analyze experiments, categorize PRs, bucket experiments, summarize what's been tried, understand experiment history, review merged vs closed results, or asks "what experiments have we run / worked / failed". Also triggers for: "pull the latest experiments", "what's been tried so far", "category breakdown of PRs", "which experiments succeeded", "noam track analysis". When a branch name is mentioned (e.g. "noam branch", "on the noam branch"), pass it as the base branch to scope the fetch to just those PRs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

wandb/senpai372026年10月6日 更新

Create a typed assignment branch and draft PR for one student. Use when the advisor has a concrete hypothesis and the student has no open `status:wip` or `status:review` assignment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

wandb/senpai372026年10月6日 更新

Create or improve a Senpai target repository's program.md. Use this skill whenever the user wants to point Senpai at a fresh ML or research target repository, define the research objective, primary metric, benchmark contract, allowed edit boundaries, W&B reporting contract, or prepare a repo for autonomous advisor/student experiment loops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

wandb/senpai372026年10月6日 更新

Open GitHub Issues for human input and respond to the researcher team. Use this skill whenever you need to handle a human_issue event, respond to human issues, ask humans a question, or check team communications. Also triggers for: "any human messages?", "check issues", "respond to humans".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

wandb/senpai372026年10月6日 更新

Choose, configure, launch, and collect bounded subagents for research and engineering decisions. Root agents and delegation-capable subagents should read this before delegating: every task requires an explicit model tier, and high-leverage work such as research ideation, round planning, plateau pivots, large research reviews, hard optimization, disputed evidence, and expensive experiment portfolios requires frontier judgment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

wandb/senpai372026年10月6日 更新

wandb のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する