本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

competition-agent-cloud

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for AI-agent, prompt-injection, MCP or toolchain, cloud, container, CI/CD, and supply-chain challenges. Use when the user asks to analyze prompt-to-tool flows, retrieval poisoning, mounted secrets, deployment drift, runtime-vs-manifest mismatches, registry provenance, or CI-produced artifacts under sandbox assumptions. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(3)

  • SKILL.md3.9 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml379 B
  • references/agent-cloud.md1.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Competition Agent Cloud

Use this skill only as a downstream specialization after $ctf-sandbox-orchestrator is already active and has established sandbox assumptions, node ownership, and evidence priorities. If that has not happened yet, return to $ctf-sandbox-orchestrator first.

Use this skill when the challenge path is driven by prompt-to-tool execution, retrieval and memory boundaries, deployment drift, or build and release provenance.

Reply in Simplified Chinese unless the user explicitly requests English.

Quick Start

  1. Decide whether the dominant path is agentic or infrastructure-driven.
  2. Map one minimal control chain: untrusted input -> visible context -> tool or deployment side effect.
  3. Distinguish checked-in intent from live runtime truth.
  4. Keep prompts, tool args, manifests, mounts, and provenance steps in compact evidence blocks.
  5. Reproduce the exploit or misconfiguration with minimal context and minimal instrumentation.

Workflow

1. Agent And Prompt Injection

  • Treat prompts, tool schemas, retrieved chunks, planner notes, memory files, and handoffs as challenge artifacts.
  • Prove one minimal chain from untrusted content to model-visible instruction to tool side effect.
  • Distinguish claimed capability from runtime-exposed capability.

2. Cloud, Containers, And CI/CD

  • Split build-time, deploy-time, and runtime.
  • Reconcile compose or kube manifests with live mounts, env, logs, and traffic.
  • Trace provenance from source to dependency resolution to build to publish to runtime consumer.

Read This Reference

  • Load references/agent-cloud.md for the control-stack checklist, deployment-truth checklist, and evidence packaging.
  • If the task is specifically about prompt-boundary abuse or retrieved-content-to-tool drift, prefer $competition-prompt-injection.
  • If the task is specifically about CI, dependency provenance, registry drift, or shipped artifacts, prefer $competition-supply-chain.
  • If the task is specifically about queue payloads, async worker drift, retries, or worker-only runtime state, prefer $competition-queue-worker-drift.
  • If the task is specifically about SSRF to internal control surfaces, metadata endpoints, or metadata-derived token pivots, prefer $competition-ssrf-metadata-pivot.
  • If the task is specifically about proxy-upstream parse differentials, ambiguous headers, path normalization drift, or request smuggling behavior, prefer $competition-request-normalization-smuggling.
  • If the task is specifically about metadata-service access, instance or workload identity, link-local token paths, or metadata-derived privilege, prefer $competition-cloud-metadata-path.
  • If the task is specifically about kube API permissions, service-account trust, admission behavior, controller drift, or cluster secret exposure, prefer $competition-k8s-control-plane.
  • If the task is specifically about live mounts, sidecars, init containers, or runtime-only secret exposure, prefer $competition-container-runtime.
  • If the task is specifically about container-to-host boundary crossing, kernel-surface prerequisites, or escape primitive verification, prefer $competition-kernel-container-escape.

What To Preserve

  • Prompt snippets, retrieved chunks, planner transitions, and final tool args
  • Compose or Kubernetes fragments tied to live mounts or routes
  • Artifact hashes, dependency drift, CI steps, and the resulting runtime consumer

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

A/B 测试设计与分析时使用。适用于产品实验、功能验证、转化率优化。融合假设驱动 + 样本量计算 + 置信度判断。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

zhaoxuya520/AI-Fullstack-Delivery-Workflow532026年5月19日 更新

上线前业务方/产品方验收时使用。适用于功能交付确认、UAT、发布会签。融合 BDD Given-When-Then、Specification by Example、ATDD。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

zhaoxuya520/AI-Fullstack-Delivery-Workflow532026年5月19日 更新

设计无障碍可访问的界面时使用。适用于满足 WCAG 标准、键盘导航、屏幕阅读器支持。优先使用 WCAG 2.2 AA 级标准 + 键盘 + 焦点 + 对比度 + ARIA。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

zhaoxuya520/AI-Fullstack-Delivery-Workflow532026年5月19日 更新

实现可访问性(无障碍)时使用。覆盖 WCAG 2.2 AA / ARIA / 键盘导航 / 屏幕阅读器 / 颜色对比 / 焦点管理。融合 React Aria / Radix UI / Headless UI 实践 + axe-core 自动化测试。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

zhaoxuya520/AI-Fullstack-Delivery-Workflow532026年5月19日 更新

AI 模型部署时使用。适用于推理服务 / GPU / TensorRT / 监控 / 扩缩容。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

zhaoxuya520/AI-Fullstack-Delivery-Workflow532026年5月19日 更新

数据分析报告输出时使用。适用于业务分析报告、周报、专项分析、决策支持。融合洞察 + 建议 + 行动项。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

zhaoxuya520/AI-Fullstack-Delivery-Workflow532026年5月19日 更新

zhaoxuya520 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する