本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

data-auditor-cleaner

Map contest attachments to subquestions, audit and clean raw data, and emit one reusable data profile with quality, coverage, imbalance, concentration, and method-readiness evidence for downstream risk screening.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md4.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Purpose

Create traceable cleaned data and one reusable profile. Do not repeat the same data inspection separately for every candidate method.

Preconditions

  • Problem parse and subquestion IDs exist.
  • Raw files are available under workspace/data_raw/ or the workspace's documented legacy raw-data path.
  • Required outputs and known field needs are available.

Stop rather than fabricate a missing attachment, unit, field meaning, or label.

Workflow

  1. Map attachments before cleaning.

    • List each attachment with name, size, sheet names, headers, and a small preview.
    • Map it to Qx or mark it shared.
    • Ask the user only when two mappings remain materially plausible.
  2. Preserve raw data.

    • Treat raw files as read-only.
    • Record hashes or stable file metadata when practical.
    • Write cleaned copies under workspace/data_clean/.
  3. Audit structure and semantics.

    • Rows, columns, keys, types, units, categories, time granularity, and encoding.
    • Missing values, duplicates, impossible values, outliers, discontinuities, and leakage risks.
    • Field-to-subquestion and field-to-required-output mapping.
  4. Compute reusable risk-profile statistics.

    • Effective sample size and rows usable per Qx.
    • Missingness by field and row.
    • Numeric distribution summaries and extreme-value rates.
    • Category/class counts, imbalance ratios, rare levels, and cardinality.
    • Time coverage, gaps, sampling interval, and chronological split constraints.
    • Correlation/redundancy warnings where relevant.
    • Target or score concentration indicators when a target exists.
    • Record facts; do not convert them into a final method verdict.
  5. Plan and apply cleaning.

    • Separate safe normalization of representation from assumption-bearing imputations or removals.
    • Explain and record every assumption-bearing operation.
    • Keep reproducible cleaning code only when transformations are nontrivial.
  6. Assess readiness per Qx.

    • ready, ready_with_warnings, or blocked.
    • Name missing fields and risks precisely.
    • Hand the profile to method-selector for method-specific risk probes.

Canonical Outputs

workspace/data/data_report.md
workspace/data/data_profile.json
workspace/data_clean/<cleaned files>
workspace/code/scripts/<cleaning script>   # only when needed

Accept legacy workspace/data/data_clean/ as an input/output location during migration.

Data Profile Contract

data_profile.json contains:

{
  "schema_version": 1,
  "raw_files": [],
  "attachment_mapping": [],
  "fields": [],
  "quality": {
    "missingness": {},
    "duplicates": {},
    "impossible_values": {},
    "outliers": {}
  },
  "coverage": {
    "rows": 0,
    "effective_sample_size": null,
    "time_range": null,
    "time_gaps": null
  },
  "distribution_risks": {
    "class_imbalance": null,
    "rare_categories": [],
    "high_cardinality": [],
    "redundancy_warnings": [],
    "concentration_metrics": {}
  },
  "per_question_readiness": {},
  "cleaned_files": [],
  "unresolved_risks": []
}

Use null with an explanation when a field is not applicable; do not invent a value to fill the schema.

Rules

  • Do not select the model.
  • Do not overwrite raw data.
  • Do not silently delete, impute, winsorize, rescale, or recode.
  • Do not produce decorative EDA.
  • Reuse one profile downstream instead of regenerating statistics.
  • Store detailed row-level change logs only when changes occurred; successful no-op checks need only summary counts.

Verification

  • Attachment mapping is unambiguous or human-confirmed.
  • Raw files remain untouched.
  • Cleaned files trace to raw sources and transformation rules.
  • Profile includes effective sample size, imbalance/cardinality, and concentration evidence when applicable.
  • Readiness is reported per subquestion.
  • Downstream handoff points to paths rather than pasting the full report.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Detect whether approved modeling code is Python or MATLAB/Beita Tianyuan and route it to the matching reviewer using the compact named-check review contract.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1,0572026年9月24日 更新

Audit whether the semantic evidence required by the active lean or submission profile exists and is current, without requiring one verbose artifact per skill or an arbitrary number of pass bullets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1,0572026年9月24日 更新

Run scoped or final cross-media consistency checks for mathematical-modeling artifacts, comparing canonical numbers, symbols, parameters, decisions, files, and paper claims without performing full-workspace audits for low-risk changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1,0572026年9月24日 更新

Build one compact choice card at a genuine mathematical-modeling judgment point. Use before method screening, after a meaningful experiment, or before final claim/freeze approval so the human chooses the trade-off while AI handles mechanical consequences.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1,0572026年9月24日 更新

Plan the smallest set of diagnostic, comparison, paper, and appendix figures or tables needed to support verified mathematical-modeling decisions and claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1,0572026年9月24日 更新

Build the authoritative final method explanation for a submission-ready subquestion from the method card, human decision ledger, code plan, final results, and robustness evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1,0572026年9月24日 更新

zhnnky329 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する