スキルを探す

Own whether a multi-document product-architecture binder is internally consistent, complete against its stated customer/contingency/architecture coverage, and honest about which older product ambitions it has absorbed, superseded, deferred, contradicted, orphaned, or rejected. Use when running a binder Architect of Record pass, before an implementation chain cites a binder chapter as ready, when a proof-gate owner is missing, or when reconciling the binder against the older ambition corpus (website, plans, examples, ADRs). NOT for auditing a single Claude Skill bundle's structure or frontmatter (use skill-hygiene), rendering a single-PM accept/reject verdict on one finished deliverable (use port-daddy-user-surrogate-pm-review), or sequencing/stewarding a roadmap's sidequests once a gap or operator decision has been surfaced (use legible-roadmap-with-sidequests).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

App Store and Google Play submission automator with Fastlane, screenshot automation, metadata management, and TestFlight/internal testing. Activate on: app store submission, Fastlane, TestFlight, Google Play Console, screenshot automation, metadata management, app review, code signing, provisioning profiles. NOT for: CI/CD pipeline setup (use github-actions-pipeline-builder), app architecture (use react-native-architect), analytics (use mobile-analytics-crash-reporting-expert).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits an Articles of Agreement contract — the daemon-witnessed agreement every official Port Daddy agent signs covering registration, transcript reporting, tool-use gating, file claims, parley conduct, budget limits, and operator control — against the enforcement-beats-hope bar: a clause counts as safe only when it resolves to a concrete, daemon-observable mechanism with a defined denial shape, never a promise the agent might honor. Use when drafting a new agent's Articles, reviewing a compliance-level (C0-C6) claim, deciding whether a clause is genuinely enforced or merely documented, or auditing whether an agent's claimed identity can be trusted. NOT for securing the inbound event-to-spawn path (fleet-event-spawn-trust), designing the relay's transport PKI and signing keys (pd-relay-zero-trust), or tracking an agent's identity and reputation across its whole lifetime after it signs (agent-identity-continuity-reputation).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan or audit the cross-layer Harbor cooperative editor: Loro replicas for humans and agents, governed edit claims, salvage authority, and transport across shared, LAN, and remote harbors. Use when a change spans editor collaboration, identity, recovery, or transport contracts. For a single GPUI pane use gpui-rust-console; for motion use rust-gpui-motion; for a shader use gpui-shaders. NOT for non-collaborative screens, web editors, or generic Rust development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and audit a pricing function for variable-cost agent labor. Choose among per-seat, metered, credits, hybrid, and outcome pricing; name buyer value and cost metrics separately; calculate a reproducible cost floor; require pre-commitment guardrails; and stress-test declared personas. Use for offline pricing-design evidence, not billing implementation or runtime control. NOT for production billing, payment collection, or runtime spend enforcement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design or audit an agent identity, credential, session, continuity, and reputation plan. Use when attributed outcomes must survive key rotation, restart, recovery, or review; when choosing Elo, TrueSkill, a contextual bandit, or an LLM judge; and when making Sybil, newcomer, calibration, collusion, and evidence limits explicit. Produces a supplied-plan consistency audit, never proof of observed delivery, cryptographic identity, or live enforcement. NOT for proving personhood, global Sybil resistance, or an unobserved delivery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a compliance-ladder design (C0-C6) and transcript-fidelity ladder (T0-T5) plus their adapter conformance fixtures — Codex, Claude Code, Cloudflare, Ollama/LM Studio, custom stdio/HTTP agents — for the two failure modes that make a C-badge or T-fidelity label a lie: the ladder disagreeing with itself across doc/schema/ui/probe surfaces, and a level being reachable by self-report because no daemon-witnessed negative probe actually tries to forge it. Use when designing or freezing a compliance ladder, wiring an adapter conformance probe suite, deciding whether a numeric C-badge or T-label is safe to ship, or investigating a self-attestation or observed-to-controlled bypass risk. NOT for auditing a cryptographic protocol or whitepaper for adversarial soundness (`redteam-review`), writing TLA+/formal invariants for a daemon monitor (`runtime-verification-for-agents`), or agent identity, successor linkage, and reputation across restarts (`agent-identity-continuity-reputation`).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs and audits deterministic, authority-filtered partitions of trust-typed context for already admitted bodies or abstract continuation slots. Use when causal context, obligations, disclosure boundaries, vector-space identity, capacity, and omission proofs must survive partitioning. NOT for spawning or admitting agents, choosing worker count, retrieving arbitrary knowledge, writing successor prompts, or granting tools, leases, identity, or effect authority.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Safety-case design for always-on agents with episodic memory. Covers data hygiene, privacy and security risk surfaces, cost controls, scope, user dependency concerns, retention, incident containment, and responsible deployment evidence. It identifies hazards and asks for named controls, tests, owners, and residual uncertainty; it does not provide legal, clinical, youth-safety, or jurisdictional determinations. Activate on: "agent safety", "always-on agent privacy", "agent cost control", "persistent agent risks", "AI companion safety", "agent data hygiene", "runaway agent costs", "parasocial AI risk", "/always-on-agent-safety". NOT for: architecture design (use always-on-agent-architecture), input design (use always-on-agent-inputs), application brainstorming (use always-on-agent-applications), healthcare compliance specifically (use hipaa-compliance).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cryptographic security for agentic systems — zero-trust agent networking, signed message envelopes (JWS/JWE), capability-based security (ocaps), Merkle tree audit trails, WASM sandboxing, and formal verification. Covers CLI dev tool security, mTLS between agents, permission boundaries (least privilege for AI agents), and supply chain security for skills/plugins. Activate on: "agent security", "zero trust agents", "secure agent communication", "capability-based security", "ocap", "signed messages between agents", "agent audit trail", "sandbox agent execution", "agent permissions", "mTLS agents", "cryptographic verification", "agent supply chain", "OWASP agentic", "prove agent did X", "tamper-proof agent logs". NOT for: application-level SAST scanning (use security-auditor), network firewall rules (use infrastructure), SOC2/HIPAA compliance (organizational), or prompt injection defense (use prompt-engineer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Declare an agentic application's interaction disclosure, state, context, capabilities, and effect-control boundaries. Use for a reviewable design specification and static consistency audit before implementation. NOT for proving that controls are deployed or enforced, exposing private chain-of-thought, selecting a model/router, or designing a multi-agent protocol.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs and audits closed, ordered, replay-safe message protocols between already admitted agent bodies. Use when a multi-agent exchange needs explicit epochs, audiences, per-sender sequencing, gathers, terminal fences, acknowledgements, and deterministic replay. NOT for selecting or spawning agents, granting identity or authority, choosing a runtime topology, general human facilitation, wire transport implementation, or deciding whether evidence is true.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Author a pull request an AI coding agent can actually get merged: a scoped, coherent diff; a Summary and Test Plan backed by real evidence; correct triage of required-and-blocking CI gates versus external/advisory checks (e.g. a Cloudflare Pages preview build); draft-while-WIP discipline; named fixup commits for real review findings; and a clean landing through a merge queue without force-pushing or bypassing branch protection. Use when opening, updating, triaging red CI on, or landing an agent-authored GitHub PR. NOT for this repo's internal release ceremony, actor embodiments, or contributor mirror-sync mechanics (use port-daddy-internal-dev), tracking backlog/issue lifecycle across a board (use agent-issue-tracker-workflow), or deciding what to build next / sequencing a roadmap (use legible-roadmap-with-sidequests).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify every visual-evidence artifact (screenshot/GIF/recording) attached to a PR carries a provenance manifest binding it to real daemon-backed truth — daemon port, run id, transcript head hash, agent node id, commit, and an honest real/fixture/mock source label — and that operator-control-panel PRs cover the required set of proof states. Use when gating a PR's proof artifacts before merge, auditing whether a "LIVE" visual claim is backed by a real daemon run versus a reused or fixture-backed mock, or defining the required state-coverage set for a control-panel change. NOT for the capture technique itself — headless Playwright, `screencapture -x -l`, non-interruptive capture (use port-daddy-agent-skill's visual-evidence doctrine), designing the receipt body schema an artifact attaches to (use agent-work-receipt-designer), or the broader dogfood/Potemkin product-quality bar (use multi-agent-authoring-product-bar).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Patterns for writing comprehensive Vitest test suites in TypeScript projects. Covers shared test utilities, vi.mock for module mocking, fixture directories, provider/adapter testing, and state management testing. Tier - generic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up Vitest for a TypeScript project, or migrate from Jest. Use for faster test execution, native ESM/TypeScript support, and Jest-compatible API. Covers config, dependency swaps, and test file updates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guidelines for Chrome extension development with Manifest V3, covering security, performance, and best practices

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Vitest + React Testing Library patterns for the Next.js 15 frontend. Co-located component tests, mocking lib/api.ts, testing Server Components, CartProvider harness. Use when writing or reviewing *.test.ts(x) files in frontend/.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

pytest + httpx + TestClient patterns for the FastAPI backend. Dependency overrides for auth, FakeSupabase mocking, HTTPException assertions. Use when writing or reviewing backend/tests/test_*.py.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete security architecture overhaul for claude-flow v3. Addresses critical CVEs (CVE-1, CVE-2, CVE-3) and implements secure-by-default patterns. Use for security-first v3 implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The barber for your coding agents' config. Weighs everything every agent on this machine loads (instruction files, memory, MCP servers, hooks, skills, commands, subagents, plugins, leftovers), prices each item in tokens from your own transcripts, and parks the dead weight with a receipt and an undo. Use this skill whenever the user mentions config bloat, a heavy or slow session start, tokens burned before the first word, too many MCP servers, hooks that are slow or fire on every prompt, skills or commands or plugins nobody invokes, cleaning up or auditing CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md, Codex config, or asks what does my agent actually load, why is my context full before I type, which of these servers can I turn off, or what is this plugin costing me. Use it even when they only say the session feels bloated or startup got slow, and even when they mention /context, /doctor or /skill-doctor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

X (Twitter) integration for NanoClaw. Post tweets, like, reply, retweet, and quote. Use for setup, testing, or troubleshooting X functionality. Triggers on "setup x", "x integration", "twitter", "post tweet", "tweet".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Browse the web for any task — research topics, read articles, interact with web apps, fill forms, take screenshots, extract data, and test web pages. Use whenever a browser would be useful, not just when the user explicitly asks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create polished, validated architecture, workflow, sequence, data-flow, and lifecycle/state diagrams as explorable standalone HTML with inline SVG, dark/light themes, optional trace motion, and PNG/JPEG/WebP/SVG/WebM export. Accept plain-language requirements or pasted Mermaid flowchart, sequenceDiagram, and stateDiagram input; inspect repository evidence when the diagram must reflect real code. Use when the user asks to visualize system architecture, infrastructure, cloud/security/network topology, technical workflows, API call sequences, request lifecycles, data pipelines, ETL/ELT, data lineage, state machines, or to convert/beautify Mermaid.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。