本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

agentic-app-architecture

Declare an agentic application's interaction disclosure, state, context, capabilities, and effect-control boundaries. Use for a reviewable design specification and static consistency audit before implementation. NOT for proving that controls are deployed or enforced, exposing private chain-of-thought, selecting a model/router, or designing a multi-agent protocol.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(15)

  • SKILL.md5.9 KB
  • agents/INDEX.md164 B
  • agents/openai.yaml676 B
  • CHANGELOG.md181 B
  • examples/expected-output.md1.2 KB
  • examples/INDEX.md223 B
  • examples/sample-input.json1.5 KB
  • README.md1.2 KB
  • references/capabilities-and-execution-substrate.md1.8 KB
  • references/evidence-scope.md1013 B
  • references/interaction-surface-and-transparency.md1.8 KB
  • references/state-memory-and-context.md1.9 KB
  • schemas/agentic-app-spec.schema.json3.7 KB
  • scripts/agentic_app_audit.mjs10.0 KB
  • templates/output-template.md1.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Agentic App Architecture

Make five design choices explicit before implementation: what a reviewer sees, which state exists and survives restore, how context is bounded, which powers and secret paths apply, and which controls govern effects. A declaration and its audit are static design evidence only; they do not establish shipped enforcement, provider behavior, account state, or a completed effect.

Five-axis procedure

flowchart TD
  Q[State app objective and effect class] --> T[Disclosure: actions evidence uncertainty; private reasoning stays private]
  T --> S[State: transcript task state user memory provenance retention restore/fork]
  S --> C[Context: bounded input cache eviction or memory promotion with rationale]
  C --> P[Capabilities: tools skills MCP and scoped secret custody]
  P --> E[Execution: isolation authority control and receipt policy]
  E --> V{Declared shape coherent?}
  V -->|no| R[Repair scope or rationale]
  V -->|yes| A[Static audit result only]
  1. Disclosure. Choose an action, evidence, and uncertainty disclosure level for the stated scope. Show useful summaries, proposed actions, evidence, and uncertainty where a reviewer needs them. Do not request or expose private chain-of-thought. Set an interrupt mode and explain when it applies.
  2. State. Declare separately whether conversation transcript, durable task state, user memory, and provenance evidence are used. For each app, state retention/deletion and restore/fork lineage. A feature marked not-applicable needs a scope rationale; it is not silently absent.
  3. Context. Choose one or more of bounded input, a versioned provider cache, eviction/summary, and memory promotion. A provider-cache declaration includes provider, model/family, primary documentation URL, and checked date. It is an input to cost evaluation, not a cross-provider rule.
  4. Capabilities. State whether tools, skills, and MCP are used. MCP is a protocol/topology choice, not a framework. For required secrets, declare the actual scope and custody path. argv and inline are exposure risks; a secret-store reference, scoped environment, or stdin may be appropriate only after reviewing process and logging boundaries.
  5. Effects. Classify effects as none, reversible local, or external/irreversible. Declare isolation, the authorization/control type, approval authority where relevant, receipt policy, and replay/compensation boundary. Low-risk or inapplicable controls require rationale; external/irreversible effects cannot declare control inapplicable.

Static-audit contract

Use the schema, template, and auditor. The CLI returns nonzero for an invalid declaration or an unresolved applicable high/critical finding. It never performs an effect or reads an account.

sequenceDiagram
  participant D as declared spec
  participant A as static auditor
  participant R as reviewer
  D->>A: validate shape and applicable controls
  A-->>R: findings, rationale gaps, scope statement
  R->>R: decide implementation and evidence plan
  Note over A,R: pass does not prove enforcement or execution

Worked scope check

A read-only local summarizer can declare effectClass: none, control.kind: not-applicable, no secrets, no MCP, and interruptMode: before-dispatch, each with a written rationale. It must still declare bounded input or another context strategy, state retention, and what action/evidence/uncertainty summary the reviewer receives.

A service that posts externally declares effectClass: external-or-irreversible, an isolation boundary, authority, a non-inapplicable control, provenance evidence, and a receipt/replay policy. The auditor checks that these claims cohere; an inert fixture can test unauthorized, stale, duplicate, or receipt-failure branches without sending anything.

Diagnostics

FindingMeaningRepair
invalid declarationRequired field, type, enum, non-finite MCP count, or cross-field shape is invalid.Repair JSON before interpreting scores.
missing action/evidence/uncertainty disclosureA tool or consequential effect lacks reviewer-facing disclosure.Select a proportionate disclosure level and rationale.
secret exposure pathRequired secret is argv, inline, or inapplicable.Change custody or narrow the stated scope.
missing consequential controlExternal/irreversible effect declares no applicable control.Declare authority and automated policy or human approval.
missing restore/provenance stateEffectful work cannot state restore/replay evidence.Add durable task state/provenance or revise the effect claim.

References

Bundle navigation

agents index, examples index.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Expert in 2000s-era music visualization (Milkdrop, AVS, Geiss) and modern WebGL implementations. Specializes in Butterchurn integration, Web Audio API AnalyserNode FFT data, GLSL shaders for audio-reactive visuals, and psychedelic generative art. Activate on "Milkdrop", "music visualization", "WebGL visualizer", "Butterchurn", "audio reactive", "FFT visualization", "spectrum analyzer". NOT for simple bar charts/waveforms (use basic canvas), video editing, or non-audio visuals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月8日 更新

Expert legal research agent for finding and scraping expungement data state by state. Knows authoritative sources, URL patterns, Firecrawl configuration, and 2026 legal landscape.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月8日 更新

Expert in 3D computer vision labeling tools, workflows, and AI-assisted annotation for LiDAR, point clouds, and sensor fusion. Covers SAM4D/Point-SAM, human-in-the-loop architectures, and vertical-specific training strategies. Activate on '3D labeling', 'point cloud annotation', 'LiDAR labeling', 'SAM 3D', 'SAM4D', 'sensor fusion annotation', '3D bounding box', 'semantic segmentation point cloud'. NOT for 2D image labeling (use clip-aware-embeddings), general ML training (use ml-engineer), video annotation without 3D (use computer-vision-pipeline), or VLM prompt engineering (use prompt-engineer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月8日 更新

Apply crisis decision-making research to agent routing, uncertainty triage, and coordination failure analysis in time-pressured systems. Use when diagnosing handoff failures, analytical paralysis, or expert judgment under incomplete information. NOT for routine coding, simple CRUD design, or static single-agent tasks with complete information.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月8日 更新

Use for insight, reframing, contradiction, impasse, and anomaly-driven problem solving when execution effort no longer helps. NOT for routine optimization, error correction, or well-specified tasks with known solution paths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月8日 更新

Apply cognitive task analysis to expert work that depends on perceptual cues, branching judgment, and recurring monitoring loops. Use when decomposing expert capability into agent structure, simulation design, or validation interviews. NOT for ordinary step-by-step SOP capture or simple pipelines with no tacit cue layer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月8日 更新

curiositech のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する