スキルを探す

Use when: architecture mode, architect this, ADR, C4, PlantUML, system boundary, design decision, PRD gap, high ambiguity, multiple technical approaches, security architecture, data architecture, integration risk, implementability gap, story ticket, or epic ticket.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when: Tester needs UI state evidence for VBR, or Builder needs to verify an integration wire is observable end-to-end. Powered by agent-browser MCP — token-efficient browser automation (200–400 tokens/page).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writing skill for freelancers and independent consultants. Covers project proposals, bids, client emails, and scope summaries. Leads with the client's problem, not the consultant's background.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Activate for any ticket that touches a Supabase RPC, edge function, or TypeScript client function in src/lib/. Ensures both caller and callee are verified before state:ready-for-qa.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides systematic root-cause debugging. Use when tests fail, builds break, behavior doesn't match expectations, or you encounter any unexpected error. Use when you need a systematic approach to finding and fixing the root cause rather than guessing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Records decisions and documentation. Use when making architectural decisions, changing public APIs, shipping features, or when you need to record context that future engineers and agents will need to understand the codebase.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when: Good night Team, EOD, Wrapping up, or end-of-day consolidation. Archives session context, promotes durable patterns, and compacts live agent memory files for the next session.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when: 'intake this repo/skill', 'evaluate external skill', 'should we adopt X', a candidate repo URL plus an adoption question, or any external skill/workflow/tool surfaces as a possible fit for Agistra. Structured front-door evaluation of external skills, workflows, and similar capability artifacts before any install, promotion, or adaptation decision. Ends in exactly one classification: Install candidate, Adapt concept, or Reject. Never install first — intake first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

One-question-at-a-time design interrogation. Use when: 'grill me', 'interrogate this', 'one question at a time', 'brainstorm', 'let's brainstorm', 'let's discuss', or design review start. Produces ADRs and glossary as decisions settle. Do not use for settled designs — load architecture-mode instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Activate for any ticket that adds or changes a Supabase migration, environment variable, edge function deployment, or runtime configuration. Ensures infrastructure is live in the target QA environment before state:ready-for-qa.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Workflow-state classification vocabulary for inter-team relay. Maps inbound signals from the remote agent to a routing decision. Intentionally narrow — states and destinations only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Behavioral guardrails for implementation work. Reduces common LLM coding mistakes: overcomplication, silent assumption-picking, scope drift, and unverifiable success criteria. Load on Builder and software-engineer-mode.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when: investigating a legacy, inherited, third-party-built, or otherwise newly-unfamiliar codebase before scoping a migration or major refactor. Formalizes a repeatable five-step investigation pass — entry-point census, business-rule classification, side-effect/idempotency cataloging, implicit-contract discovery, semantic-duplication detection — plus a canonical per-project Open Questions document. Requires checkable signals: ticket keywords or prior documentation gaps. Not a mandatory gate; reserved for entry-point-heavy work in code areas with no prior investigation record.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the team lead points Architect at a prior agistra.dev hub path and asks it to check for or perform additional migration — trigger phrasing such as 'migrate my data from <path>', 'check what didn't get migrated', 'did we miss anything from my old hub', or 'do a completeness pass on <path>'. Walks the prior hub's full directory tree read-only, diffs it against the fixed scripted migration scope plus any existing migration report, and asks the team lead one clear question at a time about anything a scripted migration would never have discovered. Never writes or copies anything itself — every confirmed item is delegated to the existing migration primitives. Do not use for the first-run scripted migration prompt during `npm run setup` — that is unrelated, already-automated flow this skill does not replace.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when: Good morning Team, start-of-day briefing, or morning status request. Architect orchestrates; Builder, Tester, and Router return their sections as subagents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use immediately after RBR confirms a root cause and a fix is scoped, before considering the finding complete. Checks whether the confirmed defect is one instance of a structurally identical pattern elsewhere in the same file family, workflow, or business-domain area, and folds in or explicitly defers every other instance found. Mandatory for Architect and CAO — not an optional lens the agent judges when to apply.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when: planner mode, planning mode, proposal, scope definition, estimate, timeline, client message, external communication, pricing, delivery confidence, commercial risk, or project delivery planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when: Tester runs a full QA session, processes a Builder handoff, executes test steps, writes a GitHub test report, or aligns ticket state after verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when: analysing a project's delivery health — CI/CD, commit patterns, and working tree state.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when: analysing a project's user-facing health — discoverability, documentation, and product clarity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when: a general codebase assessment, pre-migration/pre-rewrite review, or explicit security-focused request needs a structured, repeatable security audit pass covering hardcoded secrets, injection-prone constructs, auth/debug backdoors, and insecure config defaults. Complements (does not replace) the built-in /security-review command. Not a mandatory gate on every ticket.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review Codex/Claude agent skills, profile manifests, and skill-related deploy changes before they ship. Use when creating, editing, importing, installing, or reviewing SKILL.md files, agent manifests, optional third-party skills, or plugin skill bundles. Checks trigger quality, progressive disclosure, evidence gates, security, hallucination risk, validation, and deployment impact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when: implement a scoped ticket, fix a bug, add tests, prepare a PR-ready code change, or reuse a standard builder workflow across software engineer agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when: reviewing or producing any external-facing prose — ADRs, proposals, GitHub comments, Telegram messages, cover letters, client drafts, or planner-mode wording. Removes AI-tell patterns and raises writing quality before output leaves the team.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。