「diff」の検索結果

Render a proposed redesign of a page on the current website as a self-contained static HTML file, then iterate via the impeccable craft loop. Per-page, idempotent, stale-aware. Use when the user asks for a redesign prototype, a before/after comparison, a design preview, a page mockup, a visual diff of the redesign, or invokes /stardust:prototype.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compares the performance of two or more audience segments across key metrics side by side. Use this skill when someone wants to compare audiences, cohorts, or groups — for example, "how do mobile users compare to desktop users on conversion," "compare new vs. returning visitors," "show me the difference between these two segments," "compare these audiences on our KPIs," or "which segment performs better." Also trigger for "segment comparison," "audience comparison," or "cohort comparison."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compares the performance of two or more audience segments across key metrics side by side. Use this skill when someone wants to compare audiences or visitor groups — for example, "how do mobile visitors compare to desktop on conversion," "compare new vs. returning visitors," "show me the difference between these two segments," "compare these audiences on our KPIs," or "which segment performs better." Also trigger for "segment comparison" or "audience comparison."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optional focused post-implementation review routing. Use only when the user requests review or the changed surface has a clear specialist evidence need that direct diff inspection and the smallest relevant check cannot cover. Never creates an automatic review swarm.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

PR test analysis routing. Use for pull request or diff test impact, changed-test review, CI failure interpretation, and focused test matrix recommendations; do not use for general code review or editing tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compares old vs new prompts across test cases with diff summaries, stability metrics, breakage analysis, and fix suggestions. Use for "prompt testing", "A/B testing prompts", "prompt versioning", or "quality regression".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build multiple genuinely different versions of a UI piece you describe, rendered behind a visual picker so you can flip through them live and promote the one that feels right. Only runs when explicitly invoked; it does not trigger on its own.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Survey a codebase's animation and motion code as a senior motion advisor, then produce a prioritized audit and self-contained implementation plans for other agents (or cheaper models) to execute. Read-only on source code — it plans improvements, it does not apply them. Use when the user asks to "improve the animations", "audit the motion", "make this app feel better", or wants a roadmap of animation fixes rather than a review of a single diff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a Spark branch or pull request needs final diff hygiene, validation selection, commit scope, remote topology, and readiness checked before publication.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

HTTP request smuggling checklist: CL.TE, TE.CL, TE.TE variants, detection with timing and differential responses, WAF bypass, cache poisoning, credential hijacking, and request smuggling via HTTP/2. Use when testing reverse proxy/load balancer configurations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

HTTP parameter pollution (HPP) checklist: duplicate parameter injection, backend vs frontend parsing differences, WAF bypass via HPP, server-side vs client-side HPP, and practical exploitation patterns. Use when testing web applications for parameter handling flaws.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunt Session Management vulnerabilities — session fixation (no regeneration on login), insufficient invalidation on logout / password-change / email-change, predictable or low-entropy session IDs, JWT-as-session with no exp/revocation, refresh-token rotation/reuse-detection gaps, OAuth/SSO session linkage, device-bound-session (DBSC) downgrade, and cookie attribute issues (Secure/HttpOnly/SameSite/__Host-). Validate with TWO real sessions (attacker A + victim B), body-diff every 200, and OOB confirmation for theft chains. Medium to Critical (fixation→admin hijack, no-invalidation→persistent ATO).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discover a single-page-app's hidden backend API from its public JS bundle, then test that API for broken access control / missing authentication. One of the highest-yield web plays in modern recon — SPAs ship their entire backend route map to the browser, and the API behind them is frequently missing the auth middleware the login page implies. Built from an authorized engagement where this play found an unauthenticated financial API that an ASM scan reporting hundreds of 'Criticals' completely missed. Use whenever a target serves a JS-heavy SPA (React/Vue/Angular/Next), an 'app'/'console'/'dashboard'/'portal' subdomain, or any `*api*` host shows up in recon. Leaked build artifacts (source maps / .env / .git / asset-manifest) are owned by hunt-source-leak; API version-inventory and behavioral diffing by hunt-shadow-api; this skill owns mapping a live SPA's backend routes from its JS bundle and testing them for broken access control / missing auth.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunting skill for auth bypass vulnerabilities. Built from 12 public bug bounty reports across SAML XSW / parser-differential (GitHub Enterprise CVE-2025-25291/25292), SAML signature stripping (Uber, Rocket.Chat, samlify CVE-2025-47949), SAML domain enforcement bypass via control characters (HackerOne 2024), partner-portal cross-IdP assertion reuse (Slack), WordPress XMLRPC bypassing SSO (Uber), JWT alg-confusion HS256/RS256 (Jitsi), JWT signature-validation skip (Linktree, Newspack), and token-audience confusion (Argo CD CVE-2023-22482). For standalone JWT signature/crypto forging (alg:none, key confusion, kid/jku) see hunt-jwt-crypto; this skill covers JWT only inside SSO/SAML/token-trust bypass chains. SAML assertion-layer attacks (XSW, comment injection, signature stripping, XXE-in-assertion) are owned by hunt-saml; this skill owns the broader cross-protocol auth-bypass taxonomy. Use when hunting auth bypass — see the Legacy-Protocol Matrix for branded-UI vs legacy-endpoint patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunt Missing/Weak Rate Limiting — login brute force, OTP/2FA brute force (10^6 keyspace), password-reset-token brute, credential stuffing, username/email enumeration via error-string / status-code / timing differences, weak password policy, missing CAPTCHA (CAPTCHA token replay / single-use / concurrency-window bypass specifics → hunt-captcha-bypass), IP-based rate-limit bypass via X-Forwarded-For and friends, ReDoS. Distinguishes hard lockout vs soft IP-throttle vs CAPTCHA-injection vs silent shadow-throttling (avoids false-negative 'no rate limit' conclusions). Medium to Critical depending on what the brute reaches (OTP→ATO = Critical).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Browser automation powers web testing, scraping, and AI agent interactions. The difference between a flaky script and a reliable system comes down to understanding selectors, waiting strategies, and anti-detection patterns. This skill covers Playwright (recommended) and Puppeteer, with patterns for testing, scraping, and agentic browser control. Key insight: Playwright won the framework war. Unless you need Puppeteer's stealth ecosystem or are Chrome-only, Playwright is the better choice in 202

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tools are how AI agents interact with the world. A well-designed tool is the difference between an agent that works and one that hallucinates, fails silently, or costs 10x more tokens than necessary. This skill covers tool design from schema to error handling. JSON Schema best practices, description writing that actually helps the LLM, validation, and the emerging MCP standard that's becoming the lingua franca for AI tools. Key insight: Tool descriptions are more important than tool implementa

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in building products that wrap AI APIs (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.) into focused tools people will pay for. Not just 'ChatGPT but different' - products that solve specific problems with AI. Covers prompt engineering for products, cost management, rate limiting, and building defensible AI businesses. Use when: AI wrapper, GPT product, AI tool, wrap AI, AI SaaS.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enterprise-grade code review agent. Reviews PRs, diffs, or code files for security vulnerabilities, performance issues, error handling gaps, architecture smells, and test coverage. Works with any language, any repo, no dependencies required.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fast X Intelligence CLI (Rust) — search, analyze, and engage on X/Twitter from the terminal. Use when: (1) user says "x research", "search x for", "search twitter for", "what are people saying about", "what's twitter saying", "check x for", "x search", "search x", (2) user wants real-time monitoring with "watch", (3) user needs AI-powered analysis with Grok ("analyze", "sentiment"), (4) user needs intelligence reports ("report"), (5) user wants to track followers ("diff"), (6) user needs trending topics ("trends"). Also supports: bookmarks, likes, following (OAuth), x-search, collections, CSV/JSON/JSONL export. Non-goals: Not for posting tweets, not for DMs, not for enterprise features.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interact with the BNB Chain Model Context Protocol (MCP) server. Use to query DeFi data, get token prices, search documentation, fetch git diffs, and retrieve smart contract source code on BNB Chain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

X Intelligence CLI — search, analyze, and engage on X/Twitter from the terminal. Use when: (1) user says "x research", "search x for", "search twitter for", "what are people saying about", "what's twitter saying", "check x for", "x search", "search x", "find tweets about", "monitor x for", "track followers", (2) user is working on something where recent X discourse would provide useful context (new library releases, API changes, product launches, cultural events, industry drama), (3) user wants to find what devs/experts/community thinks about a topic, (4) user needs real-time monitoring ("watch"), (5) user wants AI-powered analysis ("analyze", "sentiment", "report"). Also supports: bookmarks, likes, following (read/write), trending topics, Grok AI analysis, and cost tracking. Export as JSON, JSONL (pipeable), CSV, or Markdown. Non-goals: Not for posting tweets, not for DMs, not for enterprise features. Requires OAuth for user-context operations (bookmarks, likes, following, diff).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute git commit with conventional commit message analysis, intelligent staging, and message generation. Use when user asks to commit changes, create a git commit, or mentions "/commit". Supports: (1) Auto-detecting type and scope from changes, (2) Generating conventional commit messages from diff, (3) Interactive commit with optional type/scope/description overrides, (4) Intelligent file staging for logical grouping

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Requires OFOX_API_KEY — create one at https://app.ofox.ai. Produce a set of product images to choose between — several styles, backgrounds or treatments of one product, for a listing, a store page or an ad — and quote the whole set's cost before any of it is spent. From a real product photo it edits that photo once per style, so the item stays identical across the set; for a fictional or prototype product with no photo it generates from text instead, and says what that costs in accuracy. Delegates to ofox-image-core. Use when a user asks for several product images at once, e.g. "give me 4 main images in different styles for this product", "a few background options for this photo", "some listing images for my shop", or "show this product on white, on wood, and in a lifestyle scene". Do not use for a single change to a single image (see image-edit), for video from a product photo (see seedance-product-video), or for one plain text-to-image render (that is ofox-image-core's `generate`).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。