「complexity」の検索結果

Check code for standardization, readability, maintenance complexity, and defensive coding practices

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

No-code automation democratizes workflow building. Zapier and Make (formerly Integromat) let non-developers automate business processes without writing code. But no-code doesn't mean no-complexity - these platforms have their own patterns, pitfalls, and breaking points. This skill covers when to use which platform, how to build reliable automations, and when to graduate to code-based solutions. Key insight: Zapier optimizes for simplicity and integrations (7000+ apps), Make optimizes for power

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Firebase gives you a complete backend in minutes - auth, database, storage, functions, hosting. But the ease of setup hides real complexity. Security rules are your last line of defense, and they're often wrong. Firestore queries are limited, and you learn this after you've designed your data model. This skill covers Firebase Authentication, Firestore, Realtime Database, Cloud Functions, Cloud Storage, and Firebase Hosting. Key insight: Firebase is optimized for read-heavy, denormalized data. I

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute and test GraphQL depth limit attacks using deeply nested recursive queries to identify denial-of-service vulnerabilities in GraphQL APIs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs GraphQL introspection attacks to Şunu çıkar: full API schema including types, queries, mutations, subscriptions, and field definitions from GraphQL endpoints. The tester uses introspection queries to map the attack surface, identifies sensitive fields and mutations, tests for query depth and complexity limits, and exploits GraphQL-specific vulnerabilities including batching attacks, alias-based brute force, and nested query DoS. Activates for requests involving GraphQL security testi...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refactor Python code to improve quality while keeping functionality intact. Use when cleaning up complexity, removing duplication, or tightening structure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plain language directive. Cuts verbosity, corporate jargon, and overused AI vocabulary. Use when you want clear, direct, short writing. No fluff, no hedging, no unnecessary complexity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code refactoring strategies, technical debt reduction, architecture modernization, and code quality improvement. Use when refactoring code, modernizing legacy code, reducing complexity, or improving maintainability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discover governing equations from data using PySR (evolutionary symbolic regression). Physics-constrained search with dimensional analysis, custom operators, and complexity-accuracy tradeoffs. Use when you need an interpretable equation, not a black-box model.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

RNN+Transformer hybrid with O(n) inference. Linear time, infinite context, no KV cache. Train like GPT (parallel), infer like RNN (sequential). Linux Foundation AI project. Production at Windows, Office, NeMo. RWKV-7 (March 2025). Models up to 14B parameters.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Medicinal chemistry filters. Apply drug-likeness rules (Lipinski, Veber), PAINS filters, structural alerts, complexity metrics, for compound prioritization and library filtering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Strip designs to their essence by removing unnecessary complexity. Great design is simple, powerful, and clean. Use when the user asks to simplify, declutter, reduce noise, remove elements, or make a UI cleaner and more focused.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze a completed phase diff for high-confidence behavior-preserving simplifications and apply only explicitly approved proposals. Use after execution and before review to reduce duplication, dead code, needless complexity, or avoidable inefficiency.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code review focused exclusively on over-engineering. Finds what to delete: reinvented standard library, unneeded dependencies, speculative abstractions, dead flexibility. One line per finding: location, what to cut, what replaces it. Use when the user says "review for over-engineering", "what can we delete", "is this over-engineered", "simplify review", or invokes /ponytail-review. Complements correctness-focused review, this one only hunts complexity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quickly understand an unfamiliar codebase or project by mapping its architecture, identifying key components and data flows, and surfacing complexity hotspots. Load when the user asks to understand a repo, explain how something works, map the architecture, onboard to a codebase, or explore how components connect. Also triggers on "walk me through this codebase", "how does this project work", "explain the architecture", "what does this repo do", "show me the structure", "onboard me", or any request to build a mental model of a codebase before making changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns Hi-C/Micro-C FASTQ into a deduplicated, filtered .pairs file with pairtools and decides whether the library worked. Covers the bwa mem -SP5M / bwa-mem2 / chromap --preset hic alignment idiom (mates mapped as independent single-end reads), pairtools parse vs parse2 and the walks-policy choice (5unique pairwise vs all for Pore-C/Micro-C concatemers), pair-type classification (keep UU and rescued UC), dedup (PCR vs optical/by-tile), select by pair_type/MAPQ/distance, restriction-fragment handling (restrict, Arima dual-enzyme, Micro-C/DNase fragment-free), and allele-specific phasing (pairtools phase to two coolers). The library-QC decision uses % long-range cis as the one-number quality metric, trans as the noise floor, orientation balance as fragment-map-free dangling-end/self-circle QC, and % duplicates as a complexity proxy. Use when processing Hi-C/Micro-C/Omni-C reads into pairs, judging library quality, handling multi-enzyme or restriction-agnostic protocols, or generating allele-specific contacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Aligns and QCs methylated-RNA-immunoprecipitation (MeRIP / m6A-seq) IP and input libraries using STAR or HISAT2 splice-aware mapping, samtools sort/index, IP/input matched-pair tracking, antibody-lot metadata recording, replicate concordance via deepTools multiBamSummary + plotCorrelation, IP enrichment QC via plotFingerprint and per-transcript IP/input ratio distributions, library-complexity saturation curves via PreSeq c_curve / lc_extrap, and the explicit do-NOT-deduplicate convention for standard non-UMI MeRIP. Use when preparing paired IP and input BAM files for exomePeak2 / MeTPeak / MACS3 peak calling, evaluating MeRIP replicate concordance and IP enrichment, deciding whether to deduplicate (standard MeRIP typically NOT — see Tips), choosing genome-vs-transcriptome alignment for downstream peak vs m6Anet workflows, recording antibody clone and lot metadata for downstream cross-batch reconciliation, detecting failed IPs via saturation curves and IP/input distribution shape, or generating IP-over-Input bigWig tracks for downstream visualisation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quality control for pooled CRISPR screens covering library representation, Gini index, log-skew, replicate Pearson and Spearman concordance, essentialome precision-recall AUC against CEGv2 (Hart 2017), Cas9 cut-toxicity diagnostics, copy-number amplicon detection (Aguirre 2016 / Munoz 2016), bottleneck propagation through plasmid pool, infection, selection, and endpoint stages, MOI verification, and DepMap-style screen-quality scoring. Use when assessing screen quality before hit calling, deciding whether to repeat or rescue a screen, diagnosing low-confidence hits, choosing between MAGeCK / BAGEL2 / Chronos based on quality grade, picking a normalization strategy from QC signatures, or evaluating whether an in-vivo screen retained adequate library complexity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive quality control for CLIP-seq libraries (eCLIP, iCLIP, iCLIP2, PAR-CLIP) covering library complexity (preseq), FRiP, IDR replicate reproducibility, read-distribution metagene, SMInput vs IgG control rationale, rRNA / snoRNA contamination, fragment-length distribution, and ENCODE-compliance thresholds. Use when assessing whether a CLIP library passed, deciding lenient vs stringent peak thresholds, comparing replicates with IDR rescue and self-consistency ratios, or distinguishing failed IP from over-amplified library.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ATAC-seq library quality control -- TSS enrichment, FRiP, fragment-size periodicity, library complexity (NRF/PBC1/PBC2), mitochondrial fraction, and ENCODE 4 thresholds. Use when assessing whether an ATAC-seq library passes ENCODE acceptance criteria, diagnosing transposition artefacts, comparing Omni-ATAC vs standard prep quality, or selecting which replicates to drop before peak calling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Strip designs to their essence by removing unnecessary complexity. Great design is simple, powerful, and clean. Use when the user asks to simplify, declutter, reduce noise, remove elements, or make a UI cleaner and more focused.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cost optimization patterns for LLM API usage — model routing by task complexity, budget tracking, retry logic, and prompt caching.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze chatmode or prompt files and recommend optimal AI models based on task complexity, required capabilities, and cost-efficiency

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build self-serve acquisition and expansion motions. Use when deciding PLG vs sales-led, optimizing activation, driving freemium conversion, building growth equations, or recognizing when product complexity demands human touch. Includes the parallel test where sales-led won 10x on revenue.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。